No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
When Pinocchio becomes a real boy: Capability and felicity in AI and interactive depictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2023
Abstract
Clark and Fischer analyze social robots as interactive depictions, presenting characters that people can interact with in social settings. Unlike other types of depictions, the props for social robot depictions depend on emerging interactive technologies. This raises questions about how such depictions depict: They conflate character and prop in ways that delight, confuse, mistreat, and may become ordinary human–technology interactions.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Carroll, J. M. (2022). Why should humans trust AI? ACM Interactions, 29(4), 73–77. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3538392Google Scholar
Dale, R. (2021). GPT-3: What's it good for?. Natural Language Engineering, 27(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. A. (2022). Avoiding adverse autonomous agent actions (with peer commentary). Human–Computer Interaction, 37(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1970556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzinger, A., Goebel, R., Fong, R., Moon, T., Müller, K. R., & Samek, W. (Eds.) (2022). xxAI-Beyond explainable AI. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiku, N. (2022). The Google engineer who thinks the company's AI has come to life. Washington Post. June 11. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/11/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine/Google Scholar
Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Target article
Social robots as depictions of social agents
Related commentaries (29)
A more ecological perspective on human–robot interactions
A neurocognitive view on the depiction of social robots
Anthropomorphism, not depiction, explains interaction with social robots
Autonomous social robots are real in the mind's eye of many
Binding paradox in artificial social realities
Children's interactions with virtual assistants: Moving beyond depictions of social agents
Cues trigger depiction schemas for robots, as they do for human identities
Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted
Depiction as possible phase in the dynamics of sociomorphing
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents
How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence
How deep is AI's love? Understanding relational AI
How puzzling is the social artifact puzzle?
Interacting with characters redux
Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful
Of children and social robots
On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI
People treat social robots as real social agents
Social robots and the intentional stance
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots
Taking a strong interactional stance
The Dorian Gray Refutation
The now and future of social robots as depictions
The second-order problem of other minds
Trait attribution explains human–robot interactions
Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions
Virtual and real: Symbolic and natural experiences with social robots
When Pinocchio becomes a real boy: Capability and felicity in AI and interactive depictions
“Who's there?”: Depicting identity in interaction
Author response
On depicting social agents