Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:17:22.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surely not all experimental studies of bias need abandoning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Fiona A. White*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, NSW, Australia. [email protected] http://sydney.edu.au/science/people/fiona.white.php

Abstract

Cesario misrepresents experimental social psychology. The discipline encompasses significantly more than implicit bias research, including controlled decision making and real-world behavioral observations. Paradoxically, while critiquing popular implicit bias tasks, Cesario also describes task refinements that have significantly advanced their external validity and our contextual understanding of bias. Thus rather than abandonment, a call for “continued improvement” is a far more sensible proposition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Strauts, E., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 14681481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, J., Hudson, S. M., Guillermo, S., & Ma, D. S. (2014). The police officer's dilemma: A decade of research on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 201213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 13141329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 14641480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. J., Cesario, J., & Pleskac, T. J. (2018). How prior information and police experience impact decisions to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 601623. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmack, U. (2021). The implicit association test: A method in search of a construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 396414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tropp, L. R., White, F. A., Rucinski, C., & Tredoux, C. (in press). Intergroup contact and prejudice reduction: Prospects and challenges in changing youth attitude. Review of General Psychology.Google Scholar
White, F. A., Abu-Rayya, H. M., & Weitzel, C. (2014). Achieving twelve-months of intergroup bias reduction: The dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 158163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. A., & Abu-Rayya, H. M. (2012). A dual identity-electronic contact (DIEC) experiment promoting short- and long-term intergroup harmony. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 597608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. A., Maunder, R., & Verrelli, S. (2020). Text-based E-contact: Harnessing cooperative internet interactions to bridge the social and psychological divide. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 76119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1753459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar