Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:16:27.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prejudice is a general evaluation, not a specific emotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Angela J. Bahns
Angela J. Bahns*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481. [email protected]://www.wellesley.edu/psychology/faculty/bahns
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prejudice, like contempt, is a general evaluation rather than a specific emotion. I explore the idea that emotions and attitudes are conceptually distinct by applying Gervais & Fessler's model to the intergroup context. I argue that prejudice is an affective representation of a social group's relational value (friend or foe) and dispute the idea that there are many distinct prejudices.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahns, A. J. (2017) Threat as justification of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20(1):52–74. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1368430215591042.Google Scholar
Brigham, J. C. (1993) College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23:1933–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, C. A. & Neuberg, S. L. (2005) Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(5):770–89.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., Bahns, A. J., Warner, R. & Schaller, M. (2011) Stereotypes as justifications of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37:1488–98. doi: 10.1177/0146167211411723.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S. & Eshleman, A. (2003) A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):414–46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. (2007) The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(4):631–48.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N. & Rivera, L. M. (2006) From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:268–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C. & Williams, C. J. (1995) Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:1013–27. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6):878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. (2000) Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(4):602–16. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConahay, J. B. (1986) Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In: Prejudice, discrimination, and racism, ed. Dovidio, J. F. & Gaertner, S. L., pp. 91–125. Academic Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. R. & Leibold, J. M. (2001) Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37:435–42. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, W. (1933) The energies of men. Charles Scribner's.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L. & Cottrell, C. A. (2008) Managing the threats and opportunities afforded by human sociality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 12:63–72.Google Scholar