Article contents
On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 March 2016
Abstract
Contempt is typically studied as a uniquely human moral emotion. However, this approach has yielded inconclusive results. We argue this is because the folk affect concept “contempt” has been inaccurately mapped onto basic affect systems. “Contempt” has features that are inconsistent with a basic emotion, especially its protracted duration and frequently cold phenomenology. Yet other features are inconsistent with a basic attitude. Nonetheless, the features of “contempt” functionally cohere. To account for this, we revive and reconfigure the sentiment construct using the notion of evolved functional specialization. We develop the Attitude–Scenario–Emotion (ASE) model of sentiments, in which enduring attitudes represent others' social-relational value and moderate discrete emotions across scenarios. Sentiments are functional networks of attitudes and emotions. Distinct sentiments, including love, respect, like, hate, and fear, track distinct relational affordances, and each is emotionally pluripotent, thereby serving both bookkeeping and commitment functions within relationships. The sentiment contempt is an absence of respect; from cues to others' low efficacy, it represents them as worthless and small, muting compassion, guilt, and shame and potentiating anger, disgust, and mirth. This sentiment is ancient yet implicated in the ratcheting evolution of human ultrasocialty. The manifolds of the contempt network, differentially engaged across individuals and populations, explain the features of “contempt,” its translatability, and its variable experience as “hot” or “cold,” occurrent or enduring, and anger-like or disgust-like. This rapprochement between psychological anthropology and evolutionary psychology contributes both methodological and empirical insights, with broad implications for understanding the functional and cultural organization of social affect.
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
- 41
- Cited by
Target article
On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”
Related commentaries (26)
A sentimental education: The place of sentiments in personality and social psychology
Above and below the surface: Genetic and cultural factors in the development of values
Affect in social media: The role of audience and the presence of contempt in cyberbullying
Are sentiments subject to selection pressures? The case of oxytocin
Attitude–Scenario–Emotion (ASE) sentiments are superficial
Building a house of sentiment on sand: Epistemological issues with contempt
Constructing contempt
Contempt as the absence of appraisal, not recognition, respect
Contempt – Where the modularity of the mind meets the modularity of the brain?
Contempt, like any other social affect, can be an emotion as well as a sentiment
Deep mechanisms of social affect – Plastic parental brain mechanisms for sensitivity versus contempt
Dominance as a competence domain, and the evolutionary origins of respect and contempt
From disgust to contempt-speech: The nature of contempt on the map of prejudicial emotions
Further implications in analyzing contempt in modern society
How dare you not recognize the role of my contempt? Insight from experimental psychopathology
Including pride and its group-based, relational, and contextual features in theories of contempt
Is humility a sentiment?
On the substantial contribution of “contempt” as a folk affect concept to the history of the European popular institution of charivari
Oxytocin shapes the priorities and neural representations of attitudes and values
Prejudice is a general evaluation, not a specific emotion
Sentiments and the motivational psychology of parental care
Socioecological factors are linked to changes in prevalence of contempt over time
Two kinds of respect for two kinds of contempt: Why contempt can be both a sentiment and an emotion
Warmth and competence as distinct dimensions of value in social emotions
Warmth, competence, and closeness may provide more empirically grounded starts for a theory of sentiments
We need more precise, quantitative models of sentiments
Author response
Seeing the elephant: Parsimony, functionalism, and the emergent design of contempt and other sentiments