Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:35:19.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microbiota-gut-brain research: A plea for an interdisciplinary approach and standardization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2019

Mattia Andreoletti
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Education Science, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy. [email protected]
Maria Rescigno
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy. [email protected]://www.hunimed.eu/professors-researchers-fellows/maria-rescigno/

Abstract

Hooks et al. note that microbiota-gut-brain research suffers from serious methodological flaws and interpretative issues. We suggest two corrective measures: first, taking more seriously the need of interdisciplinary work; second, interpreting some of the methodological issues as ordinary challenges of standardization, typical of emerging disciplines.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E. J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., Fehr, E., Fidler, F., Field, A. P., Forster, M., George, E. I., Gonzalez, R., Goodman, S., Green, E., Green, D. P., Greenwald, A. G., Hadfield, J. D., Hedges, L. V., Held, L., Hua Ho, T., Hoijtink, H., Hruschka, D. J., Imai, K., Imbens, G., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Jeon, M., Jones, J. H., Kirchler, M., Laibson, D., List, J., Little, R., Lupia, A., Machery, E., Maxwell, S. E., McCarthy, M., Moore, D. A., Morgan, S. L., Munafó, M., Nakagawa, S., Nyhan, B., Parker, T. H., Pericchi, L., Perugini, M., Rouder, J., Rousseau, J., Savalei, V., Schönbrodt, F. D., Sellke, T., Sinclair, B., Tingley, D., Van Zandt, T., Vazire, S., Watts, D. J., Winship, C., Wolpert, R. L., Xie, Y., Young, C., Zinman, J. & Johnson, V. E. (2018) Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour 2(1):610.Google Scholar
Boem, F., Ratti, E., Andreoletti, M. & Boniolo, G. (2016) Why genes are like lemons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:8895.Google Scholar
Goodrich, J. K., Di Rienzi, S. C., Poole, A. C., Koren, O., Walters, W. A., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R. & Ley, R. E. (2014) Conducting a microbiome study. Cell 158(2):250–62.Google Scholar
Hooks, K. B. & O'Malley, M. A. (2017) Dysbiosis and its discontents. mBio 8:e01492-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01492-17.Google Scholar
Hugenholtz, F. & de Vos, W. M. (2018) Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: A critical evaluation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 75(1):149–60.Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. (2018) The proposal to lower P value thresholds to .005. JAMA 319(14):1429–30.Google Scholar
Levy, M., Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Thaiss, C. A. & Elinav, E. (2017) Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nature Reviews Immunology 17(4):219–32.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Price, J., Abu-Ali, G. & Huttenhower, C. (2016) The healthy human microbiome. Genome Medicine 8(1):51.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A. & Errington, T. M. (2017) Reproducibility in cancer biology: Making sense of replications. Elife 6:e23383.Google Scholar
Rescigno, M. (2017) The microbiota revolution: Excitement and caution. European Journal of Immunology 47(9):1406–13.Google Scholar
Timmermans, S. & Epstein, S. (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology 36:6989.Google Scholar
Tsilingiri, K. & Rescigno, M. (2012) Postbiotics: What else? Beneficial Microbes 4(1):101107.Google Scholar