In this work we set out to investigate the feasibility of applying measures of lexical frequency to the assessment of the writing of learners of French. A system developed for analysing the lexical knowledge of learners, according to their productive use of high and low frequency words (Laufer and Nation 1995), was adapted for French and used to analyse learners’ texts from an Open University French course. Whilst we found that this analysis could not be said to reflect the state of the learners’ vocabulary knowledge in the same way that Laufer and Nation’s study did, elements of the system’s output did correlate significantly with scores awarded by human markers for vocabulary use in these texts. This suggests that the approach could be used for self-assessment. However, the feedback that can be given to learners on the basis of the current analysis is very limited. Nevertheless, the approach has the potential for refinement and when enhanced with information derived from successive cohorts of learners performing similar writing tasks, could be a first step in the development of a viable aid for learners evaluating their own writing.

Educators are more and more concerned to integrate human and computer capabilities as efficiently as possible. There is an increasing demand in language teaching for evidence on which to base decisions about use of this ever more prevalent tool. One main yardstick for evaluation of CALL is, naturally, the human teacher. Thus there is demand for comparative data. Attempts to provide such data in a way that allows useful generalisations to be made or accurate analyses of the outcomes are still comparatively limited and difficult to produce. Many attempts have been strongly criticised and the very concept of comparative studies of this kind has been attacked. The belief asserted here is that there is still a need for general studies in a variety of contexts. A longitudinal comparative study is reported that tries to take into account some of the major criticisms, while providing support for the idea that these kinds of study still need to continue. The study provides a detailed description of the design and implementation, an evaluation in terms of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) criteria, and pre and post tests to measure outcomes across a range of language learning tasks.

With innovative ways available to assess language performance through the use of computer technology, practitioners have to rethink their preferred strategies of language testing. It is necessary to take into account both the new developments in language learning and teaching research and also the latest features computers have to offer to help with language assessment. In addition to best practices developed over the years in the field, it is necessary for provision to be made for authentic assessments of intercultural communication abilities. After a review of the latest language-testing literature and a discussion of the current problems identified in it, this paper explores the latest developments in computer technology and proposes areas of language testing in the light of the new findings. A practical application follows. This is an adaptation, in a school board in Ontario, of the latest evaluation model. The model represents unit planning as an isosceles triangle with assessed assignments stacked in horizontal bands from the base to the vertex, i.e. the top. The suggestion is offered that this approach can be enriched, by changing the triangle into a pyramid with a different model on each side. Access to the four sides by rotation of the pyramid allows a broader range of activities culminating in one final assessment task at the summit.