A cardinal number which is too large to be reached by some process is generally said to be inaccessible by that process. Many kinds of inaccessible cardinals have been discussed and for a general survey the book of H. Bachmann [1, Chapter 7] may be consulted. We consider here two inaccessibility properties. We shall denote the cardinal of a set X by |X|. The first inaccessibility property will be called regularity: the cardinal| X| will be said to be regular if there does not exist a disjoint cover {X1: i ε I} of X such that

(i)|X1|<|X|, for each i in I, and

(ii)|I|<|X|.

Over a field of characteristic p the group algebra of a finite group has a non-trivial radical if and only if the order of the group is divisible by the prime p. It would be of interest to determine the powers of the radical in the non-semi-simple case [2, p. 61]. In the particular case of p-groups the solution to the problem is known through the work of Jennings [6]. We here consider the special case of group algebras whose radicals have square zero and we relate this condition to the structure of the group itself.

In two previous papers [1], [2] the confluent form

of the δ-algorithm [3]

was established, and various properties which the confluent form of the algorithm possesses were discussed. It was shown, among other things, that if in (1)

and the notation

is used, then (1) is satisfied by

and further that under certain conditions, and for a certain n,

identically. It is the purpose of this note to derive another confluent form of the Ɛ-algorithm and to discuss its properties.

In a previous note [3], Mennicke and I showed that the relations

(8, 7|2, 3): A8=B7=(AB)2=(AB)2=(A-1B)2=(A-1B)3=E

define a group of order 10752. As we remarked, the results of §§ 2, 3 of that note are not restricted in their application to this group; they apply to the group

[3, 7]+: B7=(AB)2=(A-1B)3=E

and to any factor group of this group which in turn has Klein's simple group of order 168, defined by

(4,7|2, 3): A4=B7=(AB)2=(A-1B)3=E,

as a factor group. In this note I use these results to establish alternative “weaker” definitions for Klein's group and for two groups discussed by Sinkov [4], namely (8, 7|2, 3) defined above and a factor group of this group of order 1344. These latter groups are eloquently discussed by Coxeter [1].

The torsion of beams of L-cross-section was studied for the first time, from a mathematical standpoint, by Kotter [1]. He solved the problem in the case of an L-section both arms of which are infinite. Some time later, Trefftz [2], in his work on the torsion of beams of polygonal cross-section, applied his method also to an infinite L-section. In 1934, Seth [3] solved the case of a beam of an L-section with only one infinite arm. In 1949, Arutyanyan [4] solved the torsion problem of an L-section that has both arms finite, but of equal length, reducing the problem to that of solving an infinite system of equations.

A function φ(p) is operationally related to h(t) when they satisfy the integral equation

provided that the integral is convergent and R(p)> 0.

As usual, we shall denote (1) by the symbolic expression

φ(p) ≑ h(t).

The object of this paper is to evaluate some infinite integrals involving E-functions by the methods of the operational calculus. Most of the results obtained are believed to be new.

1. Suppose throughout that a, k are positive numbers and that p is the integer such that k—l≦p<k. Suppose also that φ(w), ψ(w) are functions with absolutely continuous (p+1)th derivatives in every interval [a, W] and that φ(w) is positive and unboundedly increasing. Let λ ={λn} be an unboundedly increasing sequence with λ1 > 0.

Given a series and a number m ≧0, we write

otherwise,

and A(w) = AO(w).

In a very recent paper [1], Basil Gordon discusses generalizations of Jacobi's identity

where x and z are complex numbers and |x| <1. He notes that some of its consequences, inter alia Euler's formula

are of interest in number theory and combinatory analysis. He proves the apparently new and striking result

where |s|<1, and also considers the possibility of generalizations. His methods are algebraic and quite simple, but perhaps do not make obvious what underlies such formulae. It may be worth while to do so, especially since the details become simpler and the presentation more perspicuous. The method given here assumes no more knowledge than his does, although the new proof is expressed in terms of theta-functions, in simple properties of which, formulae such as (3) have their origin. Further, (3) appears in a slightly more symmetrical form.