Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:39:09.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Episodic memory isn't essentially autonoetic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2018

Peter Carruthers
Peter Carruthers*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7615. [email protected]://faculty.philosophy.umd.edu/pcarruthers/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that the function attributed to episodic memory by Mahr & Csibra (M&C) – that is, grounding one's claims to epistemic authority over past events – fails to support the essentially autonoetic character of such memories. I suggest, in contrast, that episodic event memories are sometimes purely first order, sometimes autonoetic, depending on relevance in the context.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carruthers, P. (2011) The opacity of mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. & Johnson, M. (2000) Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In: The Oxford handbook of memory, ed. Tulving, E. & Craik, F., pp. 179–95. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J. & Trueswell, J. (2008) Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition 108:155–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L. (2002) Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84:189–219.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. (2011) Perplexities of consciousness. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In: Rethinking linguistic relativity, ed. Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S., pp. 70–96. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. & Papafragou, A. (2010) Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language 63:64–82.Google Scholar