Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:09:48.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social epistemic actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

Giovanni Pezzulo Open the ORCID record for Giovanni Pezzulo [Opens in a new window] ,
Laura Barca ,
Domenico Maisto  and
Francesco Donnarumma
Giovanni Pezzulo
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy. [email protected]@[email protected]://sites.google.com/site/giovannipezzulo/homehttps://sites.google.com/site/laurabarcahomepage/home https://www.istc.cnr.it/it/people/francesco-donnarumma
Laura Barca
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy. [email protected]@[email protected]://sites.google.com/site/giovannipezzulo/homehttps://sites.google.com/site/laurabarcahomepage/home https://www.istc.cnr.it/it/people/francesco-donnarumma
Domenico Maisto
Affiliation:
Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking, National Research Council, Naples 80131, Italy. [email protected] https://www.icar.cnr.it/persone/maisto/
Francesco Donnarumma
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome 00185, Italy. [email protected]@[email protected]://sites.google.com/site/giovannipezzulo/homehttps://sites.google.com/site/laurabarcahomepage/home https://www.istc.cnr.it/it/people/francesco-donnarumma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the ways humans engage in social epistemic actions, to guide each other's attention, prediction, and learning processes towards salient information, at the timescale of online social interaction and joint action. This parallels the active guidance of other's attention, prediction, and learning processes at the longer timescale of niche construction and cultural practices, as discussed in the target article.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e113
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becchio, C., Manera, V., Sartori, L., Cavallo, A. & Castiello, U. (2012) Grasping intentions: From thought experiments to empirical evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chater, N., Misyak, J., Watson, D., Griffiths, N. & Mouzakitis, A. (2018) Negotiating the traffic: Can cognitive science help make autonomous vehicles a reality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(2):93–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2011) Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences 366(1567):1149–57. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0319.Google Scholar
Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P. & Pezzulo, G. (2017a) Active inference: A process theory. Neural Computation 29(1):1–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. J., Redish, A. D. & Gordon, J. A. (2017) Computational nosology and precision psychiatry. Computational Psychiatry 1:2–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/CPSY_a_00001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, K., Rigoli, F., Ognibene, D., Mathys, C., Fitzgerald, T. & Pezzulo, G. (2015) Active inference and epistemic value. Cognitive Neuroscience 6(4):187–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leibfried, F., Grau-Moya, J. & Braun, D. A. (2015) Signaling equilibria in sensorimotor interactions. Cognition 141:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEllin, L., Sebanz, N. & Knoblich, G. (2018) Identifying others’ informative intentions from movement kinematics. Cognition 180:246–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parr, T. & Friston, K. J. (2017a) Uncertainty, epistemics and active inference. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 14(136):20170376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G. (2011) Shared representations as coordination tools for interactions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(2):303–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G. & Dindo, H. (2011) What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research 211(3):613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Donnarumma, F. & Dindo, H. (2013) Human sensorimotor communication: A theory of signaling in online social interactions. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., Donnarumma, F., Dindo, H., D'Ausilio, A., Konvalinka, I. & Castelfranchi, C. (2018) The body talks: Sensorimotor communication and its brain and kinematic signatures. Physics of Life Reviews 28:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., Iodice, P., Donnarumma, F., Dindo, H. & Knoblich, G. (2017) Avoiding accidents at the champagne reception: A study of joint lifting and balancing. Psychological Science 28(3):338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F. & Friston, K. (2018) Hierarchical active inference: A theory of motivated control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(4):294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F. & Friston, K. J. (2015) Active inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control. Progress in Neurobiology 136:17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesper, C. & Richardson, M. J. (2014) Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action. Experimental Brain Research 232(9):2945–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3982-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P., Knoblich, G. & Sebanz, N. (2011) Making oneself predictable: Reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination. Experimental Brain Research 211(3–4):517–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2706-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed