We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We shall know that a new era has begun not when a new elite holds power or a new constitution appears, but when ordinary people begin contending for their interests in new ways.
Charles Tilly (1986, p. 9)
In this chapter, I examine the relationship between the institutional logic of governance and patterns of popular contention and resistance in contemporary China. As Tilly (1986) points out, forms of contention provide important information not only about how the society has been governed but also on the extent of changes in the underlying logic of governance. Indeed, the fundamental tension between the centralization of authority and effective, local governance evolves and is often intensified in response to grass-roots inputs from the society. Different forms of collective resistance have been widespread in China, and they have even become more visible and on a larger scale in the post-Mao era (Cai 2010, Chen 2009, Chen 2012, Zhou and Ai 2016). A closer look at collective action from the bottom-up provides clues about how China is governed and the response by the resistance.
This chapter focuses on an important and prevalent mechanism in Chinese state governance – campaign-style mobilization (CSM), especially in the form of political campaigns and large-scale mass movements. In Chapter 2, I discuss relations between the Chinese state and the Chinese bureaucracy, and their interdependence and tensions. The scale of governance and the long chain of command lead to the plague of bureaucratic problems in China’s governance. In Chapter 3, I argue that there are different modes of Chinese governance, ranging from tight-coupling, subcontracting, loose-coupling, to federalism, thus leading to a process of variable-coupling. Campaign-style mobilization, as this chapter will show, is a political tool for the centralized authority to tighten up political control during struggles against bureaucrats and it is an effective mechanism to induce shifts among different modes of governance. This chapter thus provides a conceptual link integrating the first three chapters of this book: interconnections among the mode of domination and the bureaucracy, shifts in different modes of governance in light of control rights, and the role of CSM in the interactive processes.
In Chapter 2, I situate the role of the Chinese bureaucracy in the larger institutional context of patrimonial and party-state domination, whereby bureaucratic power acquires legitimation from, and is subordinate to, the arbitrary power of the emperor or the ruling party. However, the authority relationship is neither static nor rigid; rather, it is realized through a process of constant readjustment. In this chapter, I take a closer look at the internal processes and develop a middle-ranged theory on the allocation of control rights across hierarchical levels and the resultant distinct modes of governance in the Chinese bureaucracy. The proposed theoretical model is intended to shed light on a defining characteristic of the institutional mechanisms in China’s governance, namely, the variable coupling across hierarchical levels and across central and local governments.
In less than half a century (1978–2020), China has transformed itself from a country that barely fed itself to a powerful player in the global food system, characterized by massive food imports, active overseas agricultural engagement, and the global expansion of Chinese agribusiness. This Element offers a nuanced analysis of China's global food strategy and its impacts on food security and the international agri-food order. To feed a population of 1.4 billion, China actively seeks overseas agri-food resources whilst maintaining a high level of domestic food production. This strategy gives China an advantageous position in the global food system, but it also creates contradictions and problems within and beyond the country. This could potentially worsen global food insecurity in the long term.