The central nervous system undertakes the homeostatic role of sensing nutrient intake and body reserves, integrating the information, and regulating energy intake and/or energy expenditure. Few tasks regulated by the brain hold greater survival value, particularly important in farmed ruminant species, where the demands of pregnancy, lactation and/or growth are not easily met by often bulky plant-based and sometimes nutrient-sparse diets. Information regarding metabolic state can be transmitted to the appetite control centres of the brain by a diverse array of signals, such as stimulation of the vagus nerve, or metabolic ‘feedback’ factors derived from the pituitary gland, adipose tissue, stomach/abomasum, intestine, pancreas and/or muscle. These signals act directly on the neurons located in the arcuate nucleus of the medio-basal hypothalamus, a key integration, and hunger (orexigenic) and satiety (anorexigenic) control centre of the brain. Interest in human obesity and associated disorders has fuelled considerable research effort in this area, resulting in increased understanding of chronic and acute factors influencing feed intake. In recent years, research has demonstrated that these results have relevance to animal production, with genetic selection for production found to affect orexigenic hormones, feeding found to reduce the concentration of acute controllers of orexigenic signals, and exogenous administration of orexigenic hormones (i.e. growth hormone or ghrelin) reportedly increasing DM intake in ruminant animals as well as single-stomached species. The current state of knowledge on factors influencing the hypothalamic orexigenic and anorexigenic control centres is reviewed, particularly as it relates to domesticated ruminant animals, and potential avenues for future research are identified.

The results of the studies on our model combination Trichobilharzia ocellata–Lymnaea stagnalis, presented in this review, lead to the conclusion that schistosomes use multiple strategies to reach their goals, i.e. to propagate and to continue their life cycle. They have to escape from being attacked by the internal defence system (IDS) of the snail host and to profoundly affect the host's energy flow, of which reproduction and growth are the main determinants, for their own benefit. These physiological changes they establish mainly by interfering with the two regulatory systems in the snail host, the IDS and the neuroendocrine system (NES). Moreover, these two regulatory systems clearly interact with each other. Parasitic E/S products affect the host's IDS both in a direct and an indirect way. The neuropeptides or neuropeptide-like substances that are secreted by parasite glands into the host directly suppress haemocyte activity in the snail. The indirect effects include effects of (1) peptides from connective tissue cells and (2) neuropeptides from NES and/or IDS. Parasitic E/S products also induce the effects on energy flow in the host. These E/S products act either directly on a target, as shown for the inhibiting effect of the parasite on the development of the male copulation organ, or on the NES regulating reproductive activity, e.g. on gene expression. Indirect effects of E/S products on the NES (hormone-receptor interaction, electrical activity) are mediated by a factor from connective tissue cells, presumably belonging to the IDS. The physiological changes in the snail host are obviously of vital importance for the parasites, since they make use of different strategies to bring them about.