This paper is concerned with the optimal number of redundant allocation to n-component coherent systems consisting of heterogeneous dependent components. We assume that the system is built up of L groups of different components, $L\geq 1$ , where there are $n_i$ components in group i, and $\sum_{i=1}^{L}n_i=n$ . The problem of interest is to allocate $v_i$ active redundant components to each component of type i, $i=1,\dots, L$ . To get the optimal values of $v_i$ we propose two cost-based criteria. One of them is introduced based on the costs of renewing the failed components and the costs of refreshing the alive ones at the system failure time. The other criterion is proposed based on the costs of replacing the system at its failure time or at a predetermined time $\tau$ , whichever occurs first. The expressions for the proposed functions are derived using the mixture representation of the system reliability function based on the notion of survival signature. We assume that a given copula function models the dependency structure between the components. In the particular case that the system is a series-parallel structure, we provide the formulas for the proposed cost-based functions. The results are discussed numerically for some specific coherent systems.

This paper investigates the issue of stochastic comparison of multi-active redundancies at the component level versus the system level. Based on the assumption that all components are statistically dependent, in the case of complete matching and nonmatching spares, we present some interesting comparison results in the sense of the hazard rate, reversed hazard rate and likelihood ratio orders, respectively. And we also obtain two comparison results between relative agings of resulting systems at the component level and the system level. Several numerical examples are provided to illustrate the theoretical results.

We consider the problem of allocating k active spares to n components of a series system in order to optimize its lifetime. Under the hypotheses that lifetimes of n components are identically distributed with distribution function F(⋅), lifetimes of k spares are identically distributed with distribution function G(⋅), lifetimes of components and spares are independently distributed, and that ln(G(x))/ln(F(x)) is increasing in x, we show that the strategy of balanced allocation of spares optimizes the failure rate function of the system. Furthermore, under the hypotheses that lifetimes of n components are stochastically ordered, lifetimes of k spares are identically distributed, and that lifetimes of components and spares are independently distributed, we show that the strategy of balanced allocation of spares is superior to the strategy of allocating a larger number of components to stronger components. For coherent systems consisting of n identical components with n identical redundant (spare) components, we compare strategies of component and system redundancies under the criteria of reversed failure rate and likelihood ratio orderings. When spares and original components do not necessarily match in their life distributions, we provide a sufficient condition, on the structure of the coherent system, for the strategy of component redundancy to be superior to the strategy of system redundancy under reversed failure rate ordering. As a consequence, we show that, for r-out-of-n systems, the strategy of component redundancy is superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the criterion of reversed failure rate ordering. When spares and original components match in their life distributions, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition, on the structure of the coherent system, for the strategy of component redundancy to be superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the likelihood ratio ordering. As a consequence, we show that, for r-out-of-n systems, with spares and original components matching in their life distributions, the strategy of component redundancy is superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the likelihood ratio ordering.

A k-out-of-n system consisting of n components is one that works if and only if at least k of the n components work. Suppose there are n+r (1 ≤ r ≤ n) components available of which r will be used for active redundancy. From the given n+r components, r components are chosen to be used as active redundancies, and another r components receive active redundancies (i.e. these r components are bolstered). Consider a k-out-of-n system consisting of the r bolstered and the other n – r original components. The problem of which r components should be used for active redundancy, and where to allocate them in order to maximize the lifetime of the resulting k-out-of-n system is studied. It is shown that under the usual stochastic ordering ‘≤st’ the first r weakest components should be used for active redundancy and allocated in reverse order to the next r weakest components.

More applications of the principle for interchanging components due to Boland et al. (1989) in reliability theory are presented. In the context of active redundancy improvement we show that if two nodes are permutation equivalent then allocating a redundancy component to the weaker position always results in a larger increase in system reliability, which generalizes a previous result due to Boland et al. (1992). In the case of standby redundancy enhancement, we prove that a series (parallel) system is the only system for which standby redundancy at the component level is always more (less) effective than at the system level. Finally, the principle for interchanging components is extended from binary systems to the more complicated multistate systems.

Allocation of a redundant component in a system in order to optimize, in some sense, the lifetime of the system is an important problem in reliability theory, having practical applications. Consider a series system consisting of two components (say C1 and C2), having independent random lifetimes X1 and X2, and suppose a component C having random lifetime X (independent of X1 and X2) is available for active redundancy with one of the components. Let U1 = min(max(X1, X), X2) and U2 = min(X1, max(X2, X)), so that U1 (U2) denote the lifetime of a system obtained by allocating C to C1 (C2). We consider the criterion where C1 is preferred to C2 for redundancy allocation if . Here we investigate the problem of allocating C to C1 or C2, with respect to the above criterion. We also consider the standby redundancy for series and parallel systems with respect to the above criterion. The problem of allocating an active redundant component in order that the resulting system has the smallest failure rate function is also considered and it is observed that unlike stochastic optimization, here the lifetime distribution of the redundant component also plays a role, making the problem of even active redundancy allocation more complex.

The problem of where to allocate a redundant component in a system in order to optimize the lifetime of a system is an important problem in reliability theory which also poses many interesting questions in mathematical statistics. We consider both active redundancy and standby redundancy, and investigate the problem of where to allocate a spare in a system in order to stochastically optimize the lifetime of the resulting system. Extensive results are obtained in particular for series and parallel systems.