Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:20:27.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Allocation of Active Spares in Series Systems and Comparison of Component and System Redundancies

Part of: Distribution theory - Probability Special processes Operations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Neeraj Misra ,
Ishwari D. Dhariyal  and
Nitin Gupta
Neeraj Misra*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Ishwari D. Dhariyal*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Nitin Gupta*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
*
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, India.
∗∗Email address: [email protected]
∗Postal address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider the problem of allocating k active spares to n components of a series system in order to optimize its lifetime. Under the hypotheses that lifetimes of n components are identically distributed with distribution function F(⋅), lifetimes of k spares are identically distributed with distribution function G(⋅), lifetimes of components and spares are independently distributed, and that ln(G(x))/ln(F(x)) is increasing in x, we show that the strategy of balanced allocation of spares optimizes the failure rate function of the system. Furthermore, under the hypotheses that lifetimes of n components are stochastically ordered, lifetimes of k spares are identically distributed, and that lifetimes of components and spares are independently distributed, we show that the strategy of balanced allocation of spares is superior to the strategy of allocating a larger number of components to stronger components. For coherent systems consisting of n identical components with n identical redundant (spare) components, we compare strategies of component and system redundancies under the criteria of reversed failure rate and likelihood ratio orderings. When spares and original components do not necessarily match in their life distributions, we provide a sufficient condition, on the structure of the coherent system, for the strategy of component redundancy to be superior to the strategy of system redundancy under reversed failure rate ordering. As a consequence, we show that, for r-out-of-n systems, the strategy of component redundancy is superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the criterion of reversed failure rate ordering. When spares and original components match in their life distributions, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition, on the structure of the coherent system, for the strategy of component redundancy to be superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the likelihood ratio ordering. As a consequence, we show that, for r-out-of-n systems, with spares and original components matching in their life distributions, the strategy of component redundancy is superior to the strategy of system redundancy under the likelihood ratio ordering.

Keywords

Active redundancysystem redundancycomponent redundancycoherent systemstochastic orderingSchur concaveSchur convex

MSC classification

Secondary: 90B25: Reliability, availability, maintenance, inspection 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings 60K10: Applications (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 19 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2009 

References

Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1975). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Boland, P. J. and El-Neweihi, E. (1995). Component redundancy vs system redundancy in the hazard rate ordering. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 44, 614–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P. J., El-Neweihi, E. and Proschan, F. (1988). Active redundancy allocation in coherent systems. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 2, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalashnikov, V. V. and Rachev, S. T. (1986). Characterization of queueing models and their stability. Prob. Theory Math. Statist. 2, 37–53.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pecarić, J. E., Proshan, F. and Tong, Y. L. (1992). Convex Functions, Partial Orderings and Statistical Applications. Academic Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Sengupta, D. and Deshpande, J. V. (1994). Some results on the relative ageing of two life distributions. J. Appl. Prob. 31, 991–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (1992). Optimal allocation of resources to nodes of parallel and series systems. Adv. Appl. Prob. 24, 894–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Singh, H. and Singh, R. S. (1997a). Note: optimal allocation of resources to nodes of series systems with respect to failure-rate ordering. Naval Res. Logistics 44, 147–152.Google Scholar
Singh, H. and Singh, R. S. (1997b). On allocation of spares at component level versus system level. J. Appl. Prob. 34, 283–287.Google Scholar