We aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of TMS on cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), AD-related dementias, and nondementia conditions with comorbid cognitive impairment.

Systematic review, Meta-Analysis

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane database, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1, 2000, to February 9, 2023.

RCTs, open-label, and case series studies reporting cognitive outcomes following TMS intervention were included.

Cognitive and safety outcomes were measured. Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs and MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria were used to evaluate study quality. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022326423).

The systematic review included 143 studies (n = 5,800 participants) worldwide, encompassing 94 RCTs, 43 open-label prospective, 3 open-label retrospective, and 3 case series. The meta-analysis included 25 RCTs in MCI and AD. Collectively, these studies provide evidence of improved global and specific cognitive measures with TMS across diagnostic groups. Only 2 studies (among 143) reported 4 adverse events of seizures: 3 were deemed TMS unrelated and another resolved with coil repositioning. Meta-analysis showed large effect sizes on global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination (SMD = 0.80 [0.26, 1.33], p = 0.003), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 0.85 [0.26, 1.44], p = 0.005), Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (SMD = −0.96 [−1.32, −0.60], p < 0.001)) in MCI and AD, although with significant heterogeneity.

The reviewed studies provide favorable evidence of improved cognition with TMS across all groups with cognitive impairment. TMS was safe and well tolerated with infrequent serious adverse events.

Depressive symptoms in schizophrenia have a high prevalence – up to 20-60 %, at the different illness stages. Non-pharmacological treatment, namely rTMS, seems like a promising approach that lacks side-effects typical for antidepressants. RTMS is widely applied in the treatment of depression, however the studies within schizophrenia domain are still rather few

The aim was to examine a potential of neurophysiological data for prediction of the effects of rTMS in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia with depressive symptoms

20 male patients with schizophrenia (F20.004, F20.014, F20.414, ICD–10) were examined at the stage of incomplete remission with predominance of prolonged (more than 6 months) treatment resistant depressive symptoms. An examination (clinical and neurophysiological (oddball ERP and EEG) fragments)) was repeated twice - before and after a course of 10 Hz rTMS (left DLPC, 2000 pulses per session, 15 sessions).

Poor outcome was associated with initially higher coherence in alpha and lower - in beta1 EEG bands. The amplitudes of non-target N100 and mismatch negativity didn’t differ the groups of responders and nonresponders

The disturbances within brain networks of beta1 and alpha generators merit attention as potential neurophysiological markers with predictive value in rTMS treatment of patients with schizophrenia with depressive symptoms.

No significant relationships.

Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a non-invasive method of altering brain activity (1) has widened the array of therapeutic options available for various psychiatric disorders.

Trans-cranial Magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a non-invasive method of altering brain activity has widened the array of therapeutic options available for various psychiatric disorders. •A large number of studies have shown therapeutic benefits in a wide range of patient population with majority of studies in adults. •TMS is used increasingly for the treatment of child and adolescent depression. •Yet, the scarcity of studies and lack of published guidelines for this population is notable. •As TMS use is expanding in this population, an overview of the use of TMS in children and adolescents with depression may provide much needed and timely perspective on this neuropsychiatric intervention.

We searched all published studies using PubMed database, on TMS use in depressive disorders in children and adolescents. A total of 13 studies were found to have reported use of TMS in depression in children and adolescents.

We found various case series, open label studies as well as sham controlled blind studies indicating that TMS has been effective in treating depression in children and adolescents. No significant side effects were found in our review.

Studies have shown that TMS is an effective treatment option for depressive disorders in children and adolescents. Initial studies look promising but implications in large pediatric population may be different and there is a need for more double blind, controlled trials with larger sample size.

No significant relationships.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory treatment option, which is used in a variety of neurological and psychiatric diseases. It is approved for depression treatment and recommended in international guidelines. A significant reduction in treatment duration was achieved by using theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocols, which are practicable and non-inferior to conventional TMS.

To analyse the efficacy and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) of left DLPFC in inpatients with treatment-resistant depression.

We evaluated n=44 inpatients with treatment resistant major depressive disorder (n=37) and bipolar depression (n=7), who were treated with the 5 Hz intermittent TBS once daily for 3-6 weeks according to clinical decision. A total of 600 pulses and 200 bursts were applied in each treatment session. Clinical and response data were obtained by chart review.

Mean age at time of first stimulation was 54 years. 61,3 % of patients were female. On average, the current episode started 21 months before the first stimulation. In total, 924 treatment sessions were performed. On average, patients received 21 sessions. The mean MADRS Score pre-treatment was 27.2. Post-treatment, there was a clear reduction in depression severity (MADRS 18.3). No severe adverse events and no seizures occurred in this clinical observational analysis.

Intermittent TBS is efficacious and safe in patients with chronic and refractory depression.

No significant relationships.

Depressive symptoms are common in individuals with tinnitus, however, the mechanisms of their interaction are not fully understood. There is neurobiological evidence that might help understanding the interplay between tinnitus and depression which, in turn, helps in making the right choice for treating both conditions.

This case report describes a 70-year old female patient that presented with tinnitus and depressive symptoms lasting for the past 5 years.

The patient showed limited treatment results with different antidepressants. The otorhinolaryngologist ruled out any possible somatic causes of her tinnitus. Tinnitus was causing her sleep disturbances, which worsened her everyday functioning that was already quite poor even further.

After being administered with 30 rounds of TMS, her symptoms either completely resolved or at least reached a level that was adequate for her to start functioning normally on a day-to-day basis.

TMS is a technique that provides non-invasive cortical stimulation, more specifically, when used for depression treatment it stimulates the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a brain region synaptically connected to the limbic system involved in mood regulation that is proven to be hypoactive in depression. The limbic system is where tinnitus-related brain networks and regions involved in the pathophysiology of depression overlap. Further research is needed to deepen the understanding of this topic.

No significant relationships.

Insufficient efficacy of conventional treatment of auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia supports rising interest to brain stimulation techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Left temporo-parietal cortex (TP3) is involved in emergence of AH, thus neuromodulation of this area might be reasonable.

Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of 2 protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 and sham-TMS for treatment resistant AH in schizophrenia.

76 schizophrenia (ICD-10 - F20) patients with prominent AH (PANSS P3 ≥ 4, AHRS ≥ 15), who had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment, were randomized into 3 groups: 1) 1 Hz TMS (30 patients); 2) cTBS (25 patients); 3) Sham-TMS (21 patients). Sessions were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Antipsychotic medication was continued throughout the study. Patients were assessed weekly with PANSS, AHRS, CDSS, CGI-S by blinded raters. The criterion of efficacy was 30% AHRS score reduction after 3 weeks of treatment.

The number of responders were 13 (43,3%) in 1 Hz TMS group, 14 (56%) – in cTBS group, 4 (19,1%) in sham-TMS group. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between 1 Hz TMS and cTBS, but each of the active protocols was more effective than sham-TMS. Treatment was generally well tolerated in all groups, nobody was discontinued the study due to adverse events.

Both protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 are safe and effective in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with pharmacotherapy resistant AH. Further studies are needed.

No significant relationships.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disorder characterized by symptoms from four clusters after exposure to a traumatic event: re-experiencing symptoms including flashbacks and nightmares, hyperarousal, avoidance of internal and external stimuli related to trauma, and negative alterations in mood and cognition. As a noninvasive intervention that uses induction of electromagnetic fields to modulate cortical circuitry, TMS has a substantial body of literature demonstrating safety, tolerability, and efficacy in depression and potentially PTSD.

Our aim is to perform a non-systematic review of the literature regarding TMS and PTSD

A semi-structured review was conducted on Pubmed concerning TMS and PTSD

The majority of studies utilize repetitive TMS targeted to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at low frequency (1 Hz) or high frequency (10 or 20 Hz), however others have used alternative frequencies, targeted other regions, or trialed different stimulation protocols utilizing newer TMS modalities such as theta-burst TMS (TBS). It is encouraging that were positive outcomes have been shown, and often sustained for up to -3 months, nevertheless there is a paucity of long-term studies directly comparing available approaches.

TMS appears safe and effective for PTSD, although important steps are needed to operationalize optimal approaches for patients.

No significant relationships.

Recent studies suggest that online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce local entrainment of ongoing endogenous oscillatory activity that impacts cognitive performance, and the effect may depend on the function of the oscillation. However, little is known about the effects of task-specific frequencies, especially when using an online rTMS paradigm. Our previous electroencephalogram (EEG) study showed that the frontal theta rhythm is associated with the cognitive giving-up processes during problem-solving tasks.

In this study, we combined online rTMS and EEG to examine the frequency-dependent stimulation effects of rTMS on the performance of problem-solving tasks and ongoing oscillations. We hypothesized that rTMS at the theta frequency would induce ongoing theta activity and accelerate the giving-up behaviour.

rTMS was applied during problem-solving tasks with the following conditions: individual theta (4-6Hz)- and alpha (9-13Hz)-TMS, no-TMS, and sham-TMS; the order of conditions was counterbalanced across participants.

Our results showed that theta-frequency rTMS application induced an increase in theta amplitudes and shortened the giving-up response, while a control alpha-frequency rTMS application induced an increase in alpha amplitudes, but did not change giving-up responses.

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of using specific task-relevant stimulation frequency and target location for the modulation of cognitive and behavioral performance. Furthermore, considering the close resemblance between giving-up behaviour and rumination in depression, neuromodulation of cognitive giving-up processes may lead to a new intervention to treat depression by rTMS.

No significant relationships.

Fifty years ago, the estimated prevalence of autism was 30-60 per 10,000; now, it has increased to 18.5 per 1,000. Autism disorders are 4.3 times as prevalent among boys as among girls.

This systematic review provides an overview of the management of AD with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

A systematic review was conducted using (“Autism spectrum disorder” AND “Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic stimulation” AND “RTMS” OR “Children and adolescent”) in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO, resulted in 453 hits and finally qualified 18 studies.

We found 18 eligible studies, 8 randomize controlled clinical trials, 10 non-controlled clinical trials comparing TMS effects with waiting-list controls (n = 6), sham-treatment (n = 8) and no control group (n=4). There was a significant reduction of repetitive, stereotyped behaviors, irritability, social behavior, and executive function improvements with a medium-size effect. Eleven studies in this review had a moderate to high risk of bias due to small sample size, lack of blinding to treatment, and inadequate follow-up period. Four studies reported the stability of these gains in clinical outcomes for more than six months with no clarification after that.

The data encourages the potential safety and efficacy; it provides significant evidence to support TMS’s efficacy in symptom severity reductions and improved clinical outcomes in children with autism. Therefore, future large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to conclude intervention efficacy in a larger sample size further.

Eating Disorders (ED) tend to evolve chronically, with resistance to different therapeutic strategies. Chronicity is associated with high mortality rates, so it is necessary to study new therapeutic strategies. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive, safe treatment method, whose application has been studied in several pathologies.

Determine the therapeutic potential of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the treatment of Eating Disorders.

Bibliographic review of the literature published in English in the last 10 years, in the databases Pubmed, PsycINFO and Cochrane. The keywords used were: TMS, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Eating Disorder, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder. A review of the titles and abstracts of the resulting articles was made, and selected according to their relevance to the study.

Eighteen articles related to the treatment of ED with TMS were selected, either as primary or secondary outcome, of which six were review articles, ten were randomized controlled trials (RCT), one article was an oral communication and another article was a case report. Three RCTs showed improvement in bulimia nervosa, specifically in symptoms of “food craving”. Four RCT and one case report showed improvement in the symptoms of anorexia nervosa, one RCT showed no improvement in anorexia nervosa.

TMS appears to have some therapeutic potential for the treatment of ED, particularly in reducing food craving, despite some contradictory results. This work reinforces the need for more robust studies to evaluate the effectiveness of TMS, preferably randomized, with a longer follow-up and a cost-benefit analysis.

La TMS est utilisée comme traitement des états dépressifs majeurs (EDM) depuis plusieurs années, le taux de répondeurs variant entre 20 et 60 %. Nous avons voulu confronter ces données avec des patients en conditions naturalistiques. L’objectif principal de ce travail est de déterminer le pourcentage de répondeurs à une première cure de TMS chez des patients présentant un épisode dépressif majeur (EDM). L’objectif secondaire est de déterminer le profil des patients répondeurs.

Il s’agit d’une étude de cohorte rétrospective dont les critères d’inclusion sont : EDM isolé (MADRS  >  20), ou intégré dans un trouble dépressif récurrent (TDR) ou bipolaire (TB), avec mauvaise réponse ou intolérance aux antidépresseurs. Les critères d’exclusion sont : cure de TMS antérieure, contre-indication. Le protocole de TMS était : 15 séances de stimulation sur le cortex dorso-latéral gauche, fréquence 10 Hz, dix trains de 40 chocs et durée inter-trains de 28 s. L’efficacité et la tolérance du traitement ont été évaluées par comparaison de la variation des scores des échelles MADRS, CGI, et MOCA à j1, puis à j31 après la cure. Une diminution de 25 % à 50 % du score MADRS est une réponse partielle, de 50 % minimum une réponse, un score MADRS inférieure à 10 est une rémission.

De 2011 à 2013, 54 patients ont été inclus. L’analyse a porté sur 37 patients. La moyenne d’âge était de 57 ans et 60 % étaient des femmes. Vingt-sept pour cent sont en rémission, 16 % en réponse, 30 % en réponse partielle. Cinquante pour cent présentaient un TDR, 26 % un TB, et 14 % un 1er EDM. Le profil des répondeurs sera détaillé.

Les résultats sont conformes aux données de la littérature. De nouvelles études sont nécessaires pour mieux définir le profil de répondeurs.

Previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent findings regarding the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of low-frequency rTMS.

A comprehensive literature search (including PubMed, CCTR, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM-disc, NTIS,EAGLE, Clinical Trials, Current Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry) was conducted dating until June 2014. The key search terms (‘Parkinson’, ‘PD’, ‘transcranial magnetic stimulation’, ‘TMS’, ‘RTMS’ and ‘noninvasive brain stimulation’) produced eight high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCT) of low-frequency rTMS versus sham stimulation.

These eight studies, composed of 319 patients, were meta-analysed through assessment of the decreased Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS part III) score. Pooling of the results from these RCTs yielded an effect size of −0.40 (95%CI=−0.73 to −0.06, p<0.05) in UPDRS part III, which indicated that low-frequency rTMS could have 5.05 (95%CI=−1.73 to −8.37) point decrease in UPDRS part III score than sham stimulation.

Low-frequency rTMS had a significant effect on motor signs in PD. As the number of RCTs and PD patients included here was limited, further large-scale multi-center RCTs were required to validate our conclusions.