Patients with liver cancer or space-occupying cysts suffer from malnutrition due to compression of gastric and digestive structures, liver and cancer-mediated dysmetabolism, and impaired nutrient absorption. As proportion of these patients requires removal of lesions through hepatic resection, it is important to evaluate the effects of malnutrition on post-hepatectomy outcomes. In our study approach, 2011–2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to isolate in-hospital hepatectomy cases, which were stratified using malnutrition (composite of malnutrition, sarcopenia and weight loss/cachexia). The malnutrition-absent controls were matched to cases using nearest neighbour propensity score matching method and compared with the following endpoints: mortality, length of stay, hospitalisation costs and postoperative complications. There were 2531 patients in total who underwent hepatectomy with matched number of controls from the database; following the match, malnutrition cohort (compared with controls) was more likely to experience in-hospital death (6·60 % v. 5·25 % P < 0·049, OR 1·27, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·61) and was more likely to have higher length of stay (18·10 d v. 9·32 d, P < 0·001) and hospitalisation costs ($278 780 v. $150 812, P < 0·001). In terms of postoperative complications, malnutrition cohort was more likely to experience bleeding (6·52 % v. 3·87 %, P < 0·001, OR 1·73, 95 % CI 1·34, 2·24), infection (6·64 % v. 2·49 %, P < 0·001, OR 2·79, 95 % CI 2·07, 3·74), wound complications (4·5 % v. 1·38 %, P < 0·001, OR 3·36, 95 % CI 2·29, 4·93) and respiratory failure (9·40 % v. 4·11 %, P < 0·001, OR 2·42, 95 % CI 1·91, 3·07). In multivariate analysis, malnutrition was associated with higher mortality (P < 0·028, adjusted OR 1·3, 95 % CI 1·03, 1·65). Thus, we conclude that malnutrition is a risk factor of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Echinococcus multilocularis causes alveolar echinococcosis which is a chronic, progressive zoonotic disease that mainly affects the liver. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis is insidious and the patients are asymptomatic most of the time. Generally, it is incidentally found on imaging studies performed for other reasons. Specific symptoms may evolve if the vascular and biliary structures of the liver are affected. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis shows a similar pattern to malignancies in terms of radiologic and clinical features. For this reason, oncological surgical principles should be applied during the resection of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis. The gold standard surgical treatment is resection with negative surgical margin. However, in patients whose radical resection is not possible other therapeutic options include palliative resection which has no benefit to the patient, and other curative major surgical options such as ex vivo liver resection, and autotransplantation and ultimately liver transplantation. The remnant liver volume has paramount importance if resection is going to be performed. For this reason, occasionally, remnant liver volume hypertrophy is induced by employing either two-stage hepatectomy or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.

Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) is a potentially fatal disease caused by the larval growth of Echinococcus multilocularis. We analysed the clinical data of 178 consecutive HAE patients treated with definitive radical surgery at our institution. According to the surgical approach: group A patients underwent direct radical hepatic resection; group B patients first underwent percutaneous puncture external drainage, followed by radical hepatic resection 2 months later; group C patients underwent a two-step hepatic resection; and group D patients underwent liver transplantation. The baseline characteristics, mortality, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were evaluated. Symptoms were present in 79.8% (142/178) patients. Bi-lobar lesion was found in 34 (19.1%, 34/178) patients, 47.2% (84/178) of whom had ⩾2 lesions each. There were no intraoperative deaths. The postoperative mortality was 2.29% in group A, 8.62% in group D and 0% in groups B and C. The main cause of death was a serious postoperative complication (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V). Patients were followed-up systematically for a median of 35.8 months (8–72) without recurrence. Active HAE should be treated by radical liver resection, and the complicated alveolar echinococcosis of the liver has been managed whenever possible using principles of radical liver resection by experienced hepatic surgeons.

Background and objective: The removal of the non-functioning liver in cases of fulminant liver failure has been advocated by some authors as a means of improving haemodynamic instability and acid-base disturbances associated with acute liver failure.

Methods: The aim of the present experimental study was to investigate whether maintaining a non-functioning liver is preferable over removing it in terms of haemodynamic variables, after acute hepatic failure has been surgically induced. Twenty Landrace pigs were used in the study. All of them underwent portocaval anastomosis and ligation of the hepatic artery. After an 18-h period and with biochemical indices of fulminant hepatic failure clearly demonstrated, the animals were randomly assigned to one of two groups: in 10 pigs (Group A) the ischaemic liver was left in situ and no further surgical intervention was undertaken. The other 10 (Group B) underwent total hepatectomy. Haemodynamic monitoring was the same in both groups. No inotropes were administered throughout the whole period of observation.

Results: Haemodynamic deterioration was observed in the hepatectomized pigs (Group B) whereas the group with the ischaemic liver in situ (Group A) remained stable in terms of the haemodynamic variables evaluated until the end of the experiment. (Cardiac index in Group A 7.59 ± 1.25 Lmin−1 m-2 vs. 2.92 ± 0.68 Lmin−1 m−2 in Group B, P < 0.05.)

Conclusions: The concept of salvage hepatectomy in cases of acute liver failure should be redefined since there seems to be some experimental evidence that it may not be as beneficial as originally thought.