While caring for seriously ill children is a rewarding experience, pediatric healthcare providers may experience sadness and emotional distress when their patient dies. These feelings, particularly when not addressed, can lead to negative health and occupational outcomes. Remembrance practices can provide a safe space for staff to process their grief. This study explored pediatric healthcare providers’ perceptions of an annual Pediatric Remembrance Ceremony (PRC) and a quarterly program, Good Grief and Chocolate at Noon (GGCN), to learn what components of the programs were considered meaningful and the personal impact on those who attended. The programs pivoted to a virtual platform during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the study also assessed providers’ perspectives of attending the programs virtually.

A 19 multiple choice survey instrument was designed, reviewed, piloted, revised, and re-piloted by an interdisciplinary bereavement committee prior to administration. The survey included 2 open-ended questions, inviting additional insights into personal impact and future directions for remembrance programs. The survey was administered on an encrypted online platform.

Components of the PRC respondents most valued included the opportunity for staff to choose a name of a patient they cared for and to light a candle for that patient as their name is read. Those who participated in GGCN found story sharing helpful, along with having a speaker address a topic around loss and grief during the second half of the session. Both programs provided reflection, solidarity, and memorialization. Most respondents prefer having both in-person and virtual options.

Healthcare providers are affected by the death of the children they care for and value opportunities provided to join colleagues in remembering their patients. The findings underscore the value of remembrance programs in supporting bereaved staff.

Prolonged grief is a chronic and debilitating condition that affects millions of persons worldwide. The aim of this study was to use a qualitative approach to better understand how relatives with prolonged grief disorder perceive what does or not help them and whether they were able to make recommendations.

Participants were all relatives of deceased patients admitted to 26 palliative care units involved in the FamiLife study; relatives were included if diagnosed with prolonged grief symptoms (i.e., Inventory Complicated Grief (ICG) questionnaire with a cut-off >25), and volunteered to participate. Semi-directed telephone interviews were conducted by psychologists between 6 and 12 months after the patient’s death. The interviews were open-ended, without a pre-established grid, then transcribed and analyzed using a thematic approach.

Overall, 199/608 (32.7%) relatives were diagnosed with prolonged grief symptoms, i.e., with an ICG score >25, and 39/199 (20%) agreed to be interviewed. The analysis yielded 4 themes: (1) the experience of mourning: intense sadness and guilt (reported by 35/39 participants, 90%); (2) aggravating factors (38/39, 97%): feeling unprepared for death and loneliness, presence of interpersonal barriers to adjustment, external elements hindering the mourning progress; (3) facilitating factors (39/39, 100%): having inner strength or forcing oneself to get better, availability of social and emotional support; and (4) the suggestions grieving relatives had to alleviate the grief burden (36/39, 92%). The analysis enabled to identify 5 suggestions for relieving the grief burden: improving communication, developing education about death and grief, maintaining contact, offering psychological support, and choosing the right time for the palliative care team to contact the relatives.

This study revealed how bereaved relatives experienced the help provided by the healthcare teams, their representations, and what could be improved. These findings could be used to design intervention studies.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many areas of life, including culturally accepted practices at end-of-life care, funeral rites, and access to social, community, and professional support. This survey investigated the mental health outcomes of Australians bereaved during this time to determine how these factors might have impacted bereavement outcomes.

An online survey indexing pandemic and bereavement experiences, levels of grief, depression, anxiety, and health, work, and social impairment. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify groups of individuals who shared similar symptom patterns. Multinomial regressions identified pandemic-related, loss-related, and sociodemographic correlates of class membership.

1911 Australian adults completed the survey. The LCA identified four classes: low symptoms (46.8%), grief (17.3%), depression/anxiety (17.7%), and grief/depression/anxiety (18.2%). The latter group reported the highest levels of health, work, and social impairment. The death of a child or partner and an inability to care for the deceased due to COVID-19 public health measures were correlated with grief symptoms (with or without depression and anxiety). Preparedness for the person's death and levels of pandemic-related loneliness and social isolation differentiated all four classes. Unemployment was associated with depression/anxiety (with or without grief).

COVID-19 had profound impacts for the way we lived and died, with effects that are likely to ricochet through society into the foreseeable future. These lessons learned must inform policymakers and healthcare professionals to improve bereavement care and ensure preparedness during and following future predicted pandemics to prevent negative impacts.

1. (1) To gain an understanding of some of the challenges in delivering CBT for trauma related to pregnancy loss.

2. (2) To reflect on treatment of co-morbid PTSD and depression through flexible use of evidence-based treatment, and consider alternative approaches to sequential treatment.

3. (3) To consider the impact of grief in formulation and treatment.

Diagnosing mental health challenges in bereavement is controversial; however, regardless of one’s position on this matter, assessments of bereaved individuals continue to occur in clinical and research contexts. It is critical for evaluations to account for contextual factors that are unique to bereavement. This paper summarizes considerations for diagnosing depression in bereaved individuals, focusing on use of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6).

Following a literature review of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and various versions, we summarized decision rules we used in scoring the HAM-D6 in a study of parents bereaved by cancer. We expanded on existing scoring guidelines for each of the HAM-D6 items, including depressed mood, work and activities, general somatic symptoms, guilt, psychic anxiety, and psychomotor retardation, and illustrated clinical distinctions and probes for assessors to consider through case examples from our research with bereaved parents.

Considerations for assessing depressive symptoms and behavior changes in the context of bereavement were summarized. Symptoms that may be diagnostic of depression in some populations may reflect other factors in the bereaved, such as a change in priorities, social expectations surrounding grief, or avoidance of grief activators. Nuanced factors are important for assessors to consider when administering the HAM-D6 to bereaved individuals.

Our sharing of these considerations is not intended to promote diagnosis of depression in bereavement but to highlight the unique contextual factors that distinguish symptoms of depression from common experiences of grievers when applying an assessment tool such as the HAM-D6. While validated measures can be constraining, they can have clinical utility; they may increase standardization in research, help clinicians communicate with each other, advance the field more generally to understand the varying struggles bereaved individuals experience, and systemically facilitate access to services via managed care.

1. (1) To recognise the therapeutic value of CT-PTSD in addressing PTSD following a COVID-19 admission, in the context of complicated grief and delirium.

2. (2) To consider the importance of a strong therapeutic alliance when undertaking CT–PTSD.

3. (3) To understand the intersection of complicated grief and delirium in the context of ICU trauma.

4. (4) To consider the challenges in working with PTSD, whereby the target trauma (COVID–19 ICU admission) is linked with ongoing uncertainty and continuing indeterminate threat.