Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:37:08.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation and the predictive brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Daniel Dohrn Open the ORCID record for Daniel Dohrn [Opens in a new window]
Daniel Dohrn*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122Milan, Italy. [email protected] https://www.unimi.it/it/ugov/person/daniel-dohrn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prediction draws on both simulation and theory. I ask how simulation is defined, and what the roles of simulation and theory are, respectively. Simulation is flexible in structure and resources. Often simulation and theory are combined in prediction. The function of simulation consists of representing a situation that is relevantly like the target situation with regards to the feature predicted.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e129
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkeley, G. (1710/1975) The principles of human knowledge. Everyman. (Original work published in 1710)Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2002) Does conceivability entail possibility? In: Conceivability and possibility, ed. Gendler, T. S. & Hawthorne, J., pp. 71–125. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Currie, G. (1995) Image and mind: Film, philosophy, and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaut, B. (1997) Imagination, interpretation, and film. Philosophical Studies 89:331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mach, E. (1897) Über Gedankenexperimente. Zeitschrift für den Physikalischen und Chemischen Unterricht 1:1–5.Google Scholar
Noordhof, P. (2002) Imagining objects and imagining experiences. Mind and Language 17:426–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. (1985) Imagination, experience and possibility. In: Essays on Berkeley, ed. Forster, J. & Robinson, H., pp. 19–35. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strohminger, M. & Yli-Vakkuri, J. (2018) Moderate modal skepticism. In: Knowledge, belief, and god: New insights in religious epistemology, ed. Benton, M., Hawthorne, J. & Rabinowitz, D., pp. 302–321. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973) Imagination and the self. In: Problems of the self, pp. 26–45. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (2007) The philosophy of philosophy. Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yablo, S. (1993) Is conceivability a guide to possibility? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53:1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1999) Situation models. The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2016) Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 23:1028–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed