Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:19:40.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Kevin Arceneaux
Kevin Arceneaux*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Behavioral Foundations Lab, and Institute for Public Affairs, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122. [email protected]/arceneaux/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, K. & Vander Wielen, R. (2017) Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frederick, S. (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4):25–42.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2011) Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645–726.Google Scholar