No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Taking a lifespan approach to polygenic scores
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2023
Abstract
This commentary is a call to action for researchers to create and use genome-wide association studies (GWASs) with previously missed age groups (e.g., infancy, elderly), which will improve our ability to ask important developmental questions using genetic data to trace pathways across the lifespan.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bystritsky, A., Khalsa, S. S., Cameron, M. E., & Schiffman, J. (2013). Current diagnosis and treatment of anxiety disorders. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 38(1), 30.Google ScholarPubMed
Colombo, J., Kannass, K. N., Jill Shaddy, D., Kundurthi, S., Maikranz, J. M., Anderson, C. J., … Carlson, S. E. (2004). Maternal DHA and the development of attention in infancy and toddlerhood. Child Development, 75(4), 1254–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couto Alves, A., De Silva, N. M. G., Karhunen, V., Sovio, U., Das, S., & Taal, H. R., … Early Growth Genetics (EGG) Consortium (2019). GWAS on longitudinal growth traits reveals different genetic factors influencing infant, child, and adult BMI. Science Advances, 5(9), eaaw3095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick, D. M., Barr, P. B., Cho, S. B., Cooke, M. E., Kuo, S. I. C., Lewis, T. J., … Su, J. (2018). Post-GWAS in psychiatric genetics: A developmental perspective on the “other” next steps. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 17(3), e12447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faraone, S. V., & Larsson, H. (2019). Genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(4), 562–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harden, K. P., & Koellinger, P. D. (2020). Using genetics for social science. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenze, E. J., & Wetherell, J. L. (2022). A lifespan view of anxiety disorders. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L. Y., Schaub, M. A., Sirota, M., & Butte, A. J. (2012). Sex differences in disease risk from reported genome-wide association study findings. Human Genetics, 131(3), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, E. I., Ressler, K. J., Binder, E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2009). The neurobiology of anxiety disorders: Brain imaging, genetics, and psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychiatric Clinics, 32(3), 549–575.Google ScholarPubMed
Morgan, J. K., Shaw, D. S., & Olino, T. M. (2012). Differential susceptibility effects: The interaction of negative emotionality and sibling relationship quality on childhood internalizing problems and social skills. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(6), 885–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pividori, M., Schoettler, N., Nicolae, D. L., Ober, C., & Im, H. K. (2019). Shared and distinct genetic risk factors for childhood-onset and adult-onset asthma: Genome-wide and transcriptome-wide studies. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 7(6), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rovira, P., Demontis, D., Sánchez-Mora, C., Zayats, T., Klein, M., Mota, N. R., … Ribasés, M. (2020). Shared genetic background between children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 45(10), 1617–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, E. D., & Elkon, R. (2021). Genetic mapping of developmental trajectories for complex traits and diseases. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 19, 3458–3469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology
Related commentaries (24)
Beware of the phony horserace between genes and environments
Burt uses a fallacious motte-and-bailey argument to dispute the value of genetics for social science
Cognitive traits are more appropriate for genetic analysis than social outcomes
Complex interactions confound any unitary approach to social phenomena, not just biological ones
Don't miss the chance to reap the fruits of recent advances in behavioral genetics
Downward causation and vertical pleiotropy
Genomics might not be the solution, but epistemic validity remains a challenge in the social sciences
GWASs and polygenic scores inherit all the old problems of heritability estimates
Increasing the use of functional and multimodal genetic data in social science research
Methodological question-begging about the causes of complex social traits
Misguided model of human behavior: Comment on C. H. Burt: “Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science…”
Often wrong, sometimes useful: Including polygenic scores in social science research
Polygenic risk scores cannot make their mark on psychiatry without considering epigenetics
Polygenic scores and social science
Polygenic scores ignore development and epigenetics, dramatically reducing their value
Polygenic scores, and the genome-wide association studies they derive from, will have difficulty identifying genes that predispose one to develop a social behavioral trait
Social scientists would do well to steer clear of polygenic scores
Taking a lifespan approach to polygenic scores
The challenges of sociogenomics make it more, not less, worthy of careful and innovative investigation
The failure of gene-centrism
The social stratification of population as a mechanism of downward causation
The value of sociogenomics in understanding genetic evolution in contemporary human populations
Tractable limitations of current polygenic scores do not excuse genetically confounded social science
Vertical pleiotropy explains the heritability of social science traits
Author response
Polygenic scores for social science: Clarification, consensus, and controversy