Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:16:17.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of sociogenomics in understanding genetic evolution in contemporary human populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Ze Hong Open the ORCID record for Ze Hong [Opens in a new window]
Ze Hong*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA [email protected]; https://kevinhong.home.blog/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Burt's target article oddly misses the important intellectual contribution of sociogenomics to our understanding of genetic evolution in contemporary human populations. Although social scientists' immediate research agendas are often not evolutionary in nature, I call for a better appreciation of the role of sociogenomics in answering important evolutionary questions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e217
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchamp, J. P. (2016). Genetic evidence for natural selection in humans in the contemporary United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7774–7779. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600398113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colleran, H. (2016). The cultural evolution of fertility decline. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1692), 20150152. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, J., Wu, Y., Zhu, Z., Zheng, Z., Trzaskowski, M., Zeng, J., … Yang, J. (2018). Global genetic differentiation of complex traits shaped by natural selection in humans. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04191-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Z. (2020). Modelling the on-going natural selection of educational attainment in contemporary societies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 493, 110210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugh-Jones, D., & Abdellaoui, A. (2022). Human capital mediates natural selection in contemporary humans. Behavior Genetics, 52(4-5), 1–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Jensen, C. J., & Levin, B. H. (2007). The world of 2020: Demographic shifts, cultural change, and social challenge. In Schafer, J. (Ed.), Exploring the future of crime, communities, and policing (pp. 31–70). U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.Google Scholar
Kong, A., Frigge, M. L., Thorleifsson, G., Stefansson, H., Young, A. I., Zink, F., … Stefansson, K. (2017). Selection against variants in the genome associated with educational attainment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), E727–E732. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612113114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, M. C., & Tropf, F. C. (2020). Sociology, genetics, and the coming of age of sociogenomics. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milot, E., Mayer, F. M., Nussey, D. H., Boisvert, M., Pelletier, F., & Reále, D. (2011). Evidence for evolution in response to natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(41), 17040–17045. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104210108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V. (2008). Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist, 172(5), 658–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2012). Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies, 66(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.697569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. E. (1999). Integrative animal behaviour and sociogenomics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14(5), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01536-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M., & Whitfield, C. W. (2005). Sociogenomics: Social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, R. R. (2005). Mortality reductions, educational attainment, and fertility choice. American Economic Review, 65(3), 580–601. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stearns, S. C., Byars, S. G., Govindaraju, D. R., & Ewbank, D. (2010). Measuring selection in contemporary human populations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(9), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed