Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:06:05.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top on eating behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2011

Kanae Takaizumi*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Nakamura Yoshio lob, 2-579-15, Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-1192, Japan Morioka Junior College, Department of Life Science, Iwate Prefectural University, Iwate, Japan
Kazuhiro Harada
Affiliation:
Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyoda, Japan
Ai Shibata
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan
Yoshio Nakamura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether awareness of the Japanese Food Guide (JFG) can promote changes in eating behaviour.

Design

A longitudinal study was conducted in 2007 and 2009 by means of an Internet-based survey. Awareness status of the JFG and a sixteen-item scale for calculating eating behaviour scores were obtained.

Setting

Japan.

Subjects

In total, 787 Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization were included in the study. The respondents were divided into three groups. The respondents who were aware of the JFG in 2007 were categorized into Group 1. Those who were not aware of the JFG in 2007 were categorized into either Group 2 or Group 3. Group 2 became aware of the JFG by 2009, and Group 3 was not aware of the JFG in 2009.

Results

In Group 2, the eating behaviour score increased significantly by 0·8 points from 4·7 in 2007 to 5·5 in 2009 (P = 0·004). The eating behaviour score of Group 1 (6·5 points in 2007; 6·3 points in 2009) and Group 3 (3·8 points in 2007; 4·1 points in 2009) did not change significantly from 2007 to 2009.

Conclusions

Awareness of the JFG promoted eating behaviour change in the Japanese population. The results indicate that awareness of nutrition information from sources such as the JFG would promote healthy eating.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Dietary guidelines have been developed by many countries to help promote healthy dietary habits and to prevent obesity. In 2005, the Japanese Government developed the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) to help Japanese people implement dietary guidelines to promote healthy eating(1, Reference Yoshiike, Hayashi and Takemi2). The US Government developed the Food Guide Pyramid in 1992 and modified it as MyPyramid in 2005. The Australian Government developed the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating, with a message ‘Enjoy a variety of food every day’. The JFG is unique in that it is expressed in quantities of the ‘dish’ rather than in the ‘food’ format to estimate the quantity of food consumed in a daily diet and that it uses the analogy of the shape of a spinning top, which incorporates an aspect of Japanese culture(Reference Yoshiike, Hayashi and Takemi2). The JFG indicates that a balanced diet and physical activity are important to keep the top spinning (keep healthy). In addition, the JFG not only describes the optimal food intake for Japanese people but also provides nutritional messages that aim to enhance the awareness of healthy eating(1).

The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan has been actively and continuously conducting nationwide campaigns via mass media to promote awareness of the JFG among the Japanese population since 2006. The campaign consisted of advertisements showing the image of a famous Japanese actress on television, buses and trains. There were also events aimed at raising awareness among students, the younger generations, middle-aged men, nurturers, the elderly and people living alone. Dissemination of the JFG was promoted by organizations such as supermarkets, convenience stores, restaurants, schools, kindergartens, transportation facilities and public facilities(Reference Takaizumi and Nakamura3). Communication campaigns have been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for changing eating behaviours at the population level(Reference Snyder4). Additionally, communication campaigns are managed in a stepwise process by first raising awareness of the campaign message, which consequently leads to a change in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour(Reference Cavill and Bauman5, Reference McGuire6). Thus, disseminating the JFG with the communication campaign and increasing awareness of the JFG may consequently promote healthy eating behaviour.

Awareness of the JFG was found to indirectly influence eating behaviour via eating knowledge, an essential mediator of the association between awareness of the JFG and eating behaviour, in a cross-sectional survey(Reference Takaizumi, Harada and Shibata7). However, it is unclear whether there is a causal relationship between awareness of the JFG and eating behaviour among Japanese people. Although effects of communication campaigns on eating behaviour have been reported in several previous studies, almost all were conducted in Western countries(Reference Dixon, Borland and Segan8Reference Pollard, Miller and Daly10). For example, the ‘Face the Fats’ campaign reported that increased awareness of trans fats was directly associated with improved behaviour regarding grocery shopping among Americans(Reference Eckel, Kris-Etherton and Lichtenstein9). Few studies have examined the effects of nutritional campaigns on eating behaviour in Eastern countries including Japan(Reference Sun, Guo and Wang11). Additionally, most of these studies had cross-sectional designs. Compared with a cross-sectional research design, to evaluate the effects of a campaign, longitudinal research designs can more appropriately evaluate the process of behavioural change(Reference Wellings and Macdowall12). Therefore, examining the effects of awareness of the JFG on eating behaviour with a longitudinal design is necessary to demonstrate the importance of awareness for promoting healthy eating in the Japanese population.

Incidentally, the broad target population for dissemination of the JFG includes those with obesity, unhealthy eating or little interest in improving their diet. In fact, awareness of the JFG increased from 26·0 % in 2006 to 40·7 % in 2007 as a result of the campaign conducted by the Japanese Government(Reference Takaizumi and Nakamura3). However, it is not known what sociodemographic characteristics the JFG reached. According to the previous study, males, older people and those with high socio-economic status were less likely to be aware of the nutritional campaign(Reference Dixon, Borland and Segan8). To evaluate the efficacy of the JFG dissemination, it is necessary to examine the sociodemographic characteristics associated with those who are aware of the JFG.

The purpose of the present study was to explore whether awareness of the JFG influenced changes in eating behaviour among Japanese adults by using a longitudinal study design. In addition, the present study examined the sociodemographic characteristics associated with awareness of the JFG.

Methods

Study design and participants

The participants in the present study included Japanese adults who responded to an Internet-based longitudinal survey, which was conducted through a Japanese Internet research service organization. The organization owns approximately 260 000 voluntary registered samples, had access to samples of detailed sociodemographic attributes, and was able to target specific attributes according to each survey requirement. A baseline survey was conducted in November 2007 and a follow-up survey was conducted in November 2009 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of participants through the survey

The baseline survey requirement in the present study was to collect data from approximately 1700 male and female adults aged 20–79 years, with an equivalent number of males and females in each age bracket. A total of 5667 potential respondents were randomly and blindly selected from approximately 260 000 registrants aged 20–79 years in the database. They were invited to participate in the Internet-based survey via email. The invitation email contained a URL directing them to a protected area of the website, from where the questionnaire could be accessed. They could log in using their own log-in ID and password. As an incentive for participation, the Internet research organization offered reward points valued at 80 yen. A total of 1726 males and females responded (response rate: 31 %). The follow-up survey was conducted for all responders of the baseline survey excluding those who withdrew from registration (n 68) and those aged 60 years or older (n 164); the latter were considered a minority of the registered sample and a heterogeneous group in the general Internet user population because the total Internet penetration rate in Japan in 2007 was 69·0 %, while that among people aged 60 years and over was only 36·0 %(13). The data collecting procedure of the follow-up survey was the same as that of the baseline survey. Reward points of the follow-up survey were valued at 70 yen. The participants of the present study consisted of the 906 male and female respondents in both surveys. The present study did not obtain written consent of the respondent. Respondents who completed the questionnaire and clicked on the ‘send’ button at the end of the online information consent were considered to have agreed to participate in both surveys. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Waseda University.

Data were analysed for 787 individuals who provided complete information pertaining to the current study variables. The respondents were divided into three groups. Respondents who were aware of the JFG in 2007 were categorized in Group 1 (n 441). On the other hand, the respondents who were not aware of the JFG in 2007 were classified as either Group 2 (n 119) or Group 3 (n 227). Respondents in Group 2 were those who become aware of the JFG by 2009, while respondents in Group 3 were not aware of the JFG even in 2009 (Fig. 1).

Measurements

Awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top

The primary independent variable in the present study was exposure to the JFG, as measured by individual awareness of the JFG. Participants were asked ‘Do you know the JFG?’ Response choices were set as a 4-item Likert scale. For awareness, the choices of ‘I know the contents’ and ‘I have heard of it, but I do not know the contents’ were categorized as ‘awareness’, whereas ‘I have not heard of it’ and ‘The first time I have heard of it is via this survey’ were included in another category of ‘no awareness’. Awareness was scored as 1, and no awareness was scored as 0 for analysis.

Eating behaviour

The dependent variable was eating behaviour, which was assessed by sixteen questions (using yes/no response; 1 point v. 0 points) as shown in the Appendix(Reference Takaizumi, Harada and Shibata7). The total score ranged from 0 to 16 for eating behaviour. The questions included items concerning healthy eating behaviour recommended by Health Japan 21(14) and the JFG(1) and used in the Japanese National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(15). A higher score indicated engaging in a lot of recommended eating behaviours. Thus, a higher score was considered to indicate healthier eating behaviour and a lower score indicated less healthy eating behaviour.

Demographic variables

Demographic variables included gender, age, marital status, educational status, employment status, household income, BMI and waist circumference (WC). Age groups were classified as 20–29, 30–39, 40–49 and 50–59 years. Marital status was categorized as currently married or currently unmarried. Educational status was classified as less than high-school graduate, junior college graduate or equivalent, or college graduate or higher. Employment status was categorized as employed or not employed. Annual household income was classified into three categories ranging from less than 5 000 000 yen to 10 000 000 yen or more. BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight. Self-reported height and weight have been demonstrated to be strongly correlated with the objective measurement(Reference Inoue, Toyokawa and Miyoshi16). WC was determined by self-report. Participants were asked: ‘Does your waist circumference meet the criterion (males ≥85 cm, females ≥90 cm)?’(17). Participants were asked to choose one of the following answers: ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘I do not know’. These responses were dichotomized as ‘yes’ (abdominal obesity) and ‘no’ (no abdominal obesity). ‘Do not know’ responses were excluded from the analysis.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package version 16·0j (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0·05.

Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the relationship between awareness and demographic variables. Changes in awareness (2007–2009) were analysed using the McNemar test. Changes in eating behaviour score (2007–2009) were analysed with the Wilcoxon test for each awareness group stratified by gender.

Results

Basic characteristics of respondents

Table 1 presents the distribution of gender, age, marital status, educational status, employment status, annual household income, BMI and WC among the respondents. The respondents were 787 Japanese adults (410 males and 377 females), with a mean age of 39·8 (sd 9·7) years. Overall, 19 % of the respondents had a BMI greater than 25·0 kg/m2, and 22 % of the respondents were classified as having abdominal obesity based on the WC criterion(17). Sixty-four per cent of respondents were married. Twenty-seven per cent of the respondents had less than a high-school graduate level of education, whereas 48 % graduated from college or graduate school. Sixty-three per cent of respondents were employed, and 40 % of the respondents had an annual household income of less than 5 000 000 yen. Fourteen per cent earned more than 10 000 000 yen per annum. Responders were more likely to have higher educational status than the general Japanese population(15, 1820).

Table 1 Basic characteristics for total respondents (n 787) and general Japanese adults

WC, waist circumference.

†Reference data on gender, age, marital status and employed status from the 2005 Population Census of Japan(18); reference data on education status from the 2000 Population Census of Japan(19); reference data on annual household income from the 2006 National Livelihood Survey(20); reference data on BMI and WC from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2004(15).

Awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top

Awareness of the JFG was 56·0 % in 2007 and 61·8 % in 2009 (P = 0·001; Table 3). In 2009, among the 346 respondents who were not aware of the JFG in 2007, 34·4 % of respondents became aware of the JFG and 65·6 % of respondents were not aware of the JFG. Overall, 28·8 % of respondents remained unaware of the JFG in 2009.

Association between awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top and sociodemographic characteristics

In the unadjusted analysis, male gender (OR = 0·26, 95 % CI 0·17, 0·36), abdominal obesity (OR = 0·44, 95 % CI 0·31, 0·62) and employed (OR = 0·54, 95 % CI 0·40, 0·72) were negatively associated with awareness of the JFG. Married (OR = 1·53, 95 % CI 1·14, 2·06) and annual household income of 5 000 000–9 999 999 yen (OR = 1·53, 95 % CI 1·13, 2·07) were positively associated with awareness of the JFG. After adjusting for all variables, male gender (OR = 0·26, 95 % CI 0·17, 0·39) and abdominal obesity (OR = 0·65, 95 % CI 0·42, 1·00) were negatively associated with awareness of the JFG . Annual household income of 5 000 000–9 999 999 yen (OR = 1·48, 95 % CI 1·05, 2·08) was positively associated with awareness of the JFG (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) in 2007 and demographic variables of respondents: Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)

WC, waist circumference; Ref., referent category.

*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001.

†Adjusted for gender, age group, BMI, WC, marital status, educational status, employment status and annual household income.

From 2007 to 2009, awareness of the JFG increased in the following groups: males (P = 0·001), those aged 30–39 years (P = 0·04), those with a BMI of 25·0 kg/m2 or less (P = 0·011), those with abdominal obesity (P = 0·036), the unmarried (P = 0·022), the married (P = 0·032), less than high-school graduates (P = 0·003), college graduates or more (P = 0·035), the employed (P = 0·004) and annual household income of less than 5 000 000 yen (P = 0·003; Table 3).

Table 3 Change in awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) from 2007 to 2009 according to demographic variables of respondents: Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)

WC, waist circumference.

*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P < 0·001.

†McNemar test.

Association between awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top and eating behaviour score

As shown in Table 4, the eating behaviour score of Group 2 increased significantly from 4·7 in 2007 to 5·5 in 2009 (variation = 0·8 points; P = 0·004). The eating behaviour score of Group 1 (6·5 in 2007; 6·3 in 2009; variation = −0·2 points) and Group 3 (3·8 in 2007; 4·1 in 2009; variation = 0·3 points) did not change significantly from 2007 to 2009.

Table 4 Change in eating behaviour score between 2007 and 2009 according to gender and awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) among Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)

*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01.

†Group 1 was aware of the JFG in 2007 (total, n 441; males, n 168; females, n 273).

‡Group 2 was aware of the JFG in 2009 but was not aware of the JFG in 2007 (total, n 119; males, n 77; females, n 42).

§Group 3 was not aware of the JFG in 2007 and 2009 (total, n 227; males, n 165; females, n 62).

¶Wilcoxon test.

Discussion

Since 2006, the JFG has been disseminated to the Japanese population as a tool for promoting healthy eating by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(Reference Takaizumi and Nakamura3). Thus, the present study assessed the impact of awareness of the JFG on eating behaviour among Japanese adults by using a longitudinal research design. Additionally, the study investigated the sociodemographic characteristics of Japanese adults who were not aware of the JFG.

Regarding the dissemination of the JFG from 2007 to 2009, there was a positive relationship between awareness of the JFG and eating behaviour. The present study found that 61·8 % of Japanese adults were aware of the JFG in 2009, and Japanese adults who newly become aware of the JFG by 2009 engaged in healthier eating in 2009 compared with those who were not aware of the JFG by 2009. These findings suggest that a nationwide campaign for promoting the JFG would lead not only to large increases in awareness levels but also to significant positive changes in eating behaviour towards healthier eating habits among Japanese adults. In the process of behavioural change, awareness of key health messages is an important and initial step(Reference Prochaska, DiClemente and Norcross21). The promotion of the JFG may be an effective strategy to establish healthy eating patterns in the Japanese population. Previous studies(Reference Eckel, Kris-Etherton and Lichtenstein9, Reference Pollard, Miller and Daly10) observed the positive association between awareness of the message or campaign and behaviour using a cross-sectional research design. The results of the present study using a longitudinal design replicated and clearly strengthened the findings of previous studies, and provided findings regarding the positive impact of awareness of nutrition messages such as the JFG on eating behaviour in a nationwide campaign. The unique part of the JFG is that it is expressed in quantities of the ‘dish’ rather than in the ‘food’ format to estimate the quantity of food consumed in a daily diet, and it is expressed using the analogy of a spinning top(Reference Yoshiike, Hayashi and Takemi2). When specifying the amount of food intake, the following three viewpoints can be considered: (i) nutrition-based; (ii) food-based; and (iii) dish-based(1). The dish-based format is easy to understand for not only those who prepare meals but also those who eat them(Reference Yoshiike, Hayashi and Takemi2). The visual message of the JFG, from which perhaps people can easily understand ‘what’ and ‘how much’ they should eat, might cause behavioural changes in awareness of the JFG.

Awareness of the JFG increased significantly during the nationwide campaign; 61·8 % of respondents were aware of the JFG in 2009, three years after the nationwide campaign launched (56·0 % in 2007). The high levels of JFG awareness were comparable to those found in previous studies(Reference Dixon, Borland and Segan8, Reference Pollard, Miller and Daly10). For example, spontaneous awareness of the ‘Go for 2&5®, campaign in Western Australia was 62·4 % in 2004 after three years of the intervention(Reference Pollard, Miller and Daly10). The present study noted that JFG awareness was significantly lower in males, those with abdominal obesity, the unmarried and employed respondents in 2007 (JFG awareness: 56 %), and male gender and abdominal obesity were negatively associated with awareness of the JFG after adjustment. According to a previous study of the Victorian ‘2 Fruit ‘n’ 5 Veg Every Day’ campaign, awareness of the campaign slogan was 70 % after one year of promotion and was lower in males, those with more education and households classified as ‘white collar’(Reference Dixon, Borland and Segan8). Obesity is known as a risk factor for CVD, type 2 diabetes and other chronic conditions(22). In particular, abdominal obesity is currently considered as a core component of metabolic syndrome(Reference Alberti, Zimmet and Shaw23). In Japan, the proportion of obese individuals has increased among males aged 20–69 years(Reference Udagawa, Miyoshi and Yoshiike24). Thus, male gender and abdominal obesity are the target subgroups for dissemination of the JFG in Japan. The results of the present study showed that the awareness level of the JFG has increased significantly among males and abdominal obesity three years after the nationwide campaign launched, indicating that the JFG is disseminated effectively throughout the nation based on the programme by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

JFG awareness was positively related to healthy eating behaviour. According to a previous study examining the association between utilization of health information sources (i.e. mass media and interpersonal) and healthy behaviours, some health behaviours improved as the number of health information sources increased(Reference Redmond, Baer and Clark25). That is, perhaps the Japanese people with healthier eating were likely to be aware of the health information such as the JFG in nationwide campaigns. Meanwhile, those with unhealthier eating were less likely to be aware of the JFG, thus it is necessary to develop additional campaign strategies for specifically reaching those with unhealthier eating or little interest in improving their diets.

The present investigation had two limitations. The first is that weight, height and WC were assessed using self-reported values, which could have been unreliable and inconsistent. Second, the study was conducted in an Internet setting. The Internet-based surveys used monitor registration – a purposive sampling method – and thus are associated with sampling errors. Rhodes et al.(Reference Rhodes, Bowie and Hergenrather26) mentioned that individuals who are younger, more educated and have a higher income have greater access to the Internet. Therefore, the basic characteristics of the respondents might be biased, implying that the findings under such a setting might not be sufficiently applicable to the general population.

Conclusions

Awareness of the JFG promoted eating behaviour change in the Japanese population. The results indicate that the awareness of nutritional information by sources such as the JFG could promote healthy eating among Japanese adults. In addition, the dissemination of the JFG by the nationwide campaign was successful in reaching the target population groups, which were male and abdominal obesity, promoting awareness of the JFG and encouraging them to engage in healthy eating behaviour.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects (Project number: 2007B-235) and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21-57091). The work was conducted as part of the Global COE Program – Sport Sciences for the Promotion of Active Life – at Waseda University. The authors declare that they have no competing interest. K.T. participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. Y.N. conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped in drafting the manuscript. K.H. participated in the design of the study and helped in data processing. A.S. helped in drafting the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript. The authors would like to extend their appreciation to the respondents. They are grateful for all assistance received from staff and students during the study.

Appendix

Question items on eating behaviour

Questions 1–5 and 16 relate to the eating behaviour recommended by Health Japan 21 (Japan Health Promotion & Fitness Foundation, 2000(15)).

Questions 8–14 relate to the eating behaviour recommended by The Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (Food Guide Study Group, 2005(1)).

Questions 6, 7 and 15 are those used in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2004 (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2007(Reference Inoue, Toyokawa and Miyoshi16)).

References

1. Food Guide Study Group, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare & Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2005) Report of the Food Guide Study Group: Food Guide Spinning Top. http://www.j-balanceguide.com/pdf/guide_exam1.pdf (accessed July 2010).Google Scholar
2.Yoshiike, N, Hayashi, F, Takemi, Y et al. (2007) A new food guide in Japan: the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. Nutr Rev 65, 149154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Takaizumi, K & Nakamura, Y (2010) Dissemination strategy of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. J Jpn Soc Sports Ind 20, 139142.Google Scholar
4.Snyder, LB (2007) Health communication campaigns and their impact on behavior. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, 2 Suppl., S32S40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cavill, N & Bauman, A (2004) Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: do mass media campaigns have a role? J Sports Sci 22, 771790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.McGuire, WJ (1984) Public communication as a strategy for inducing health promoting behavioral change. Prev Med 13, 299319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Takaizumi, K, Harada, K, Shibata, A et al. (2011) Influence of awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top on eating behavior and obesity. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 20, 95101.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Dixon, H, Borland, R, Segan, C et al. (1998) Public reaction to Victoria's ‘2 Fruit ‘n’ 5 Veg Every Day’ campaign and reported consumption of fruit and vegetables. Prev Med 27, 572582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Eckel, RH, Kris-Etherton, P, Lichtenstein, AH et al. (2009) Americans’ awareness, knowledge, and behaviors regarding fats: 2006–2007. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 288296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Pollard, CM, Miller, MR, Daly, AM et al. (2008) Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: success of the Western Australian Go for 2&5 campaign. Public Health Nutr 11, 314320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Sun, X, Guo, Y, Wang, S et al. (2007) Social marketing improved the consumption of iron-fortified soy sauce among women in China. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, 302310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Wellings, K & Macdowall, W (2000) Evaluating mass media approaches to health promotion: a review of methods. Health Educ 100, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2008) Information & Communications Statistics Database. http://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/english/ (accessed June 2011).Google Scholar
14. Japan Health Promotion & Fitness Foundation (2000) Health Japan 21. http://www.kenkounippon21.gr.jp/ (accessed July 2010).Google Scholar
15. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2004) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2004. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou06/01.html (accessed July 2010).Google Scholar
16.Inoue, M, Toyokawa, S, Miyoshi, Y et al. (2007) Degree of agreement between weight perception and body mass index of Japanese workers: MY Health Up Study. J Occup Health 49, 376381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.The Examination Committee of Criteria for ‘Metabolic Syndrome’ in Japan (2005) The definition and criteria of metabolic syndrome. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi 94, 794809.Google Scholar
18.Japan Statistical Association (2007) 2005 Population Census of Japan. Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association, Statistics Bureau Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Post and Telecommunications.Google Scholar
19.Japan Statistical Association (2001) 2000 Population Census of Japan. Tokyo: Japan Statistical Association, Statistics Bureau Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Post and Telecommunications.Google Scholar
20. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2006) Summary of National Livelihood Survey 2006. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa06/index.html (accessed July 2010).Google Scholar
21.Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC & Norcross, JC (1992) In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 47, 11021114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. National Institutes of Health (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_gdlns.pdf (accessed July 2010).Google Scholar
23.Alberti, KG, Zimmet, P & Shaw, J (2005) The metabolic syndrome – a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366, 10591062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Udagawa, K, Miyoshi, M & Yoshiike, N (2008) Mid-term evaluation of ‘Health Japan 21’: focus area for the nutrition and diet. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17, 445452.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Redmond, N, Baer, HJ, Clark, CR et al. (2010) Sources of health information related to preventive health behaviors in a national study. Am J Prev Med 38, 620627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Rhodes, SD, Bowie, DA & Hergenrather, KC (2003) Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 6873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of participants through the survey

Figure 1

Table 1 Basic characteristics for total respondents (n 787) and general Japanese adults

Figure 2

Table 2 Association between awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) in 2007 and demographic variables of respondents: Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)

Figure 3

Table 3 Change in awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) from 2007 to 2009 according to demographic variables of respondents: Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)

Figure 4

Table 4 Change in eating behaviour score between 2007 and 2009 according to gender and awareness of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (JFG) among Japanese adults (20–59 years) who registered with an Internet research service organization (n 787)