Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:46:29.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A rational analysis and computational modeling perspective on IAM and déjà vu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2023

Justin Li ,
Steven Jones  and
John Laird Open the ORCID record for John Laird [Opens in a new window]
Justin Li
Affiliation:
Departments of Cognitive Science and Computer Science, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, USA [email protected] https://www.oxy.edu/academics/faculty/justin-li
Steven Jones
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Cognition, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [email protected] https://scijones.github.io/ [email protected] https://laird.engin.umich.edu/
John Laird
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Cognition, Ann Arbor, MI, USA [email protected] https://scijones.github.io/ [email protected] https://laird.engin.umich.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proposed memory architecture by Barzykowski and Moulin is compelling, and could be improved by incorporating a rational analysis of the functional roles of involuntary autobiographical memory and déjà vu. Additionally, modeling these phenomena computationally would remove ambiguities from the proposal. We provide examples of past work that illustrate how the phenomena may be described more precisely.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e367
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1994). Functional memory. In A functional theory of cognition (pp. 363–394). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Berntsen, D. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories: Speculations, findings, and an attempt to integrate them. In Mace, J. H. (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 20–49). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774069.ch2Google Scholar
Li, J., Derbinsky, N., & Laird, J. E. (2012). Functional interactions between memory and recognition judgments. In Proceedings of the 26th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 228–234). AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Laird, J. E. (2015). Spontaneous retrieval for prospective memory: Effects of encoding specificity and retention interval. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 142–147). University of Gronigen Press.Google Scholar
Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2020). Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900061XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, G. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering without really trying. In Umiltà, C. & Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 3–33). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, behavior, and experience. Memory & Cognition, 39(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0066-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM – retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4(2), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar