No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Potential psychological accounts for the relation between food insecurity and body overweight
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017
Abstract
We suggest two psychological mechanisms, temporal discounting and feeling of resource scarcity, for explaining the relation between food insecurity and body overweight. We demonstrate how Nettle et al.’s findings could be explained, post hoc, by each of these accounts, suggesting that their data are not rich enough to allow identification of mechanisms that underlie food insecurity and overweight relationship.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. & Vries, P. (2001) On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. British Journal of Psychology
92(4):631–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittman, M. & Wajcman, J. (2000) The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces
79(1):165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewnowski, A. & Darmon, N. (2005) Food choices and diet costs: An economic analysis. Journal of Nutrition
135(4):900–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epper, T., Fehr-Duda, H. & Bruhin, A. (2011) Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
43(3):169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O'Donoghue, T. (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature
40(2):351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. & Fong, G. T. (2007) Temporal self-regulation theory: A model for individual health behavior. Health Psychology Review
1(1):6–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabs, J. & Devine, C. M. (2006) Time scarcity and food choices: An overview. Appetite
47(2):196–204. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T. & Rabin, M. (2003) Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics
118(4):1209–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E. & Zhao, J. (2013) Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science
341(6149):976–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, M. J. & Blanchi, S. M. (2003) Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The US experience. Social Forces
81(3):999–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, K. L. (2012) Unsure what the future will bring? You may overindulge: Uncertainty increases the appeal of wants over shoulds. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
119(2):163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radel, R. & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2012) Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception hunger modulates conscious access. Psychological Science
23(3):232–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. (2012) Some consequences of having too little. Science
338(6107):682–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, R. E., Cook III, E. W., Avsar, K. B. & Cox, J. E. (2008) Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite
51(3):563–69. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666308001475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Food insecurity as a driver of obesity in humans: The insurance hypothesis
Related commentaries (25)
A game theory appraisal of the insurance hypothesis: Specific polymorphisms in the energy homeostasis network as imprints of a successful minimax strategy
A life-history theory perspective on obesity
Anorexia: A perverse effect of attempting to control the starvation response
Anti-fat discrimination in marriage more clearly explains the poverty–obesity paradox
Appraising food insecurity
Children respond to food restriction by increasing food consumption
Committed to the insurance hypothesis of obesity
Eating and body image: Does food insecurity make us feel thinner?
Epidemiological foundations for the insurance hypothesis: Methodological considerations
Episodic memory as an explanation for the insurance hypothesis in obesity
Expanding the insurance hypothesis of obesity with physiological cues
Future research directions for the insurance hypothesis regarding food insecurity and obesity
Household-level financial uncertainty could be the primary driver of the global obesity epidemic
Implicit attitudes, eating behavior, and the development of obesity
Mapping multiple drivers of human obesity
Obesity as self-regulation failure: A “disease of affluence” that selectively hits the less affluent?
Obesity is not just elevated adiposity, it is also a state of metabolic perturbation
Potential psychological accounts for the relation between food insecurity and body overweight
Predicting human adiposity – sometimes – with food insecurity: Broaden the model for better accuracy
Social nature of eating could explain missing link between food insecurity and childhood obesity
The life history model of the insurance hypothesis
Toward a mechanistic understanding of the impact of food insecurity on obesity
Towards a behavioural ecology of obesity
Using food insecurity in health prevention to promote consumer's embodied self-regulation
“It's a bit more complicated than that”: A broader perspective on determinants of obesity
Author response
Adaptive principles of weight regulation: Insufficient, but perhaps necessary, for understanding obesity