Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:15:02.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grounded procedures of connection are not created equal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2021

Daniel Wentzel Open the ORCID record for Daniel Wentzel [Opens in a new window] ,
Benjamin von Walter  and
Philipp Scharfenberger
Daniel Wentzel
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen University, Chair of Marketing, 52072Aachen, [email protected]; https://www.time.rwth-aachen.de/cms/TIME/Die-Research-Area/Marketing-MAR-/MAR-Team/Lehrstuhlinhaber/~ehdb/Wentzel-Daniel/lidx/1/
Benjamin von Walter
Affiliation:
FHS St. Gallen University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Business Management, 9001St. Gallen, [email protected]; https://www.fhsg.ch/en/persons/member/benjamin-von-walter-4391/
Philipp Scharfenberger
Affiliation:
University of St. Gallen, Institute for Customer Insight, 9000St. Gallen, Switzerland. [email protected]; http://www.ici.unisg.ch/en/team-2/philipp-scharfenberger/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lee and Schwarz propose that grounded procedures can also be related to connection rather than separation. Drawing on consumer behavior research, we point to different grounded procedures of connection – in terms of the motor actions involved, their salient properties, and their motivational conditions – and discuss how procedures of separation may be affected by the procedures of connection that precede them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e27
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J., Szabo, M., & Rodney, A. (2011). Good food, good people: Understanding the cultural repertoire of ethical eating. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(3), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540511417996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, U., Schreier, M., & Janiszewski, C. (2017). The self-expressive customization of a product can improve performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 816–831. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastovicka, J. L., & Sirianni, N. J. (2011). Truly, madly, deeply: Consumers in the throes of material possession love. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1086/658338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nägele, N., von Walter, B., Scharfenberger, P., & Wentzel, D. (2020) “Touching” services: Tangible objects create an emotional connection to services even before their first use. Business Research, 13(2), 741–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00114-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1086/598614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiecek, A., Wentzel, D., & Erkin, A. (2020). Just print it! The effects of self-printing a product on consumers’ product evaluations and perceived ownership. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00700-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar