Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:18:56.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staying alive enhances both women's and men's fitness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2022

Renée V. Hagen
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Delaney A. Knorr
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Sally Li
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Ashley Mensing
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Brooke A. Scelza
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract

We argue that Benenson et al. need to consider not only sex differences in the effects of care on offspring survival but also in age-specific fertility when predicting how longevity affects fitness. We review evidence that staying alive has important effects on both women's and men's fitness, and encourage consideration of alternative explanations for observed sex differences in threat responses.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benenson, J. F., Webb, C. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2021). Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Accepted manuscript, 186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blurton Jones, N. G. (2016). Demography and evolutionary ecology Hadza hunter gatherers. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Boyette, A. H., Lew-Levy, S., Sarma, M. S., Valchy, M., & Gettler, L. T. (2019). Fatherhood, egalitarianism, and child health in two small-scale societies in the Republic of the Congo. American Journal of Human Biology, 32(4), e23342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23342Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009). Cooperative breeding in South American hunter–gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1674), 38633870. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlowe, F. (2000). The patriarch hypothesis: An alternative explanation of menopause. Human Nature, 11, 2742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehan, C. L., Helfrecht, C., & Quinlan, R. J. (2014). Cooperative breeding and Aka children's nutritional status: Is flexibility key? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 153(4), 513525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, M. N., Blurton Jones, N. G., Colchero, F., Thompson, M. E., Enigk, D. K., Feldblum, J. T., … Pusey, A. E. (2020). Sexual dimorphism in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) and human age-specific fertility. Journal of Human Evolution, 144, 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisén, J., Martikainen, P., Silventoinen, K., & Myrskylä, M. (2014). Age-specific fertility by educational level in the Finnish male cohort born 1940–1950. Demographic Research, 31, 119136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuljapurkar, S. D., Puleston, C. O., & Gurven, M. D. (2007). Why men matter: Mating patterns drive evolution of human lifespan. PLoS ONE, 2(8), e785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000785CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed