Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:09:59.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When instrumental inference hides behind seemingly arbitrary conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2022

Edgar Dubourg Open the ORCID record for Edgar Dubourg [Opens in a new window] ,
Léo Fitouchi  and
Nicolas Baumard
Edgar Dubourg
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, École normale supérieure-PSL, 75005 Paris, France [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.edgardubourg.fr https://sites.google.com/view/leofitouchi/home https://nicolasbaumards.org/
Léo Fitouchi
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, École normale supérieure-PSL, 75005 Paris, France [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.edgardubourg.fr https://sites.google.com/view/leofitouchi/home https://nicolasbaumards.org/
Nicolas Baumard
Affiliation:
Département d’études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, École normale supérieure-PSL, 75005 Paris, France [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.edgardubourg.fr https://sites.google.com/view/leofitouchi/home https://nicolasbaumards.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We review recent evidence that game rules, rules of etiquette, and supernatural beliefs, that the authors see as “ritualistic” conventions, are in fact shaped by instrumental inference. In line with such examples, we contend that cultural practices that may appear, from the outside, to be devoid of instrumental utility, could in fact be selectively acquired and preserved because of their perceived utility.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e256
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contributed equally to this paper.

References

André, J.-B., Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2020). The mystery of symbolic culture: What fitness costs? What fitness benefits? 18. https://osf.io/kdh7t/download?format=pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N. (2016). The origins of fairness: How evolution explains our moral nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2018). Minds make societies: How cognition explains the world humans create. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2020). Why divination?: Evolved psychology and strategic interaction in the production of truth. Current Anthropology, 61(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/706879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubourg, E., & Baumard, N. (2022). Why and how did narrative fictions evolve? Fictions as entertainment technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 786770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786770CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elias, N. (1939). The civilizing process. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fitouchi, L., & Singh, M. (2022). Supernatural punishment beliefs as manipulated explanations of misfortune. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44(4), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vejacCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill-Haas, S. V., Dawson, B., Impellizzeri, F. M., & Coutts, A. J. (2011). Physiology of small-sided games training in football. Sports Medicine, 41(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.2165/11539740-000000000-00000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Z., & Henrich, J. (2021). The cultural evolution of epistemic practices: The case of divination. Human Nature, 32(3), 622–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09408-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, Z., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2022). Magic and empiricism in early Chinese rainmaking – A cultural evolutionary analysis. Current Anthropology, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n54hpGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, M. P. (2012). On the evolution of sport. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(1), 147470491201000. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, S. (2002). On the genealogy of norms: A case for the role of emotion in cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1086/341051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F., & Baron, J. (2009). Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moral–conventional distinction. Cognition, 112(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412448659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. (2018). The cultural evolution of shamanism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, M. (2020). Subjective selection and the evolution of complex culture. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. (2021). Magic, explanations, and evil: On the origins and design of witches and sorcerers. Current Anthropology, 62, 2–29. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pbwc7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, J. (2017). Influence of rules change on football. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 159. https://doi.org/10.2991/jahp-17.2017.7Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2021). Downtrends in offside offenses among “The Big Five” European football leagues. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 719270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719270CrossRefGoogle Scholar