Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:29:17.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consideration of the linguistic characteristics of letters makes the universal model of reading more universal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2012

Kyungil Kim ,
Chang H. Lee  and
Yoonhyoung Lee
Kyungil Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ajou University, Suwon 443-749, Republic of Korea. [email protected]://ajou.ac.kr/~tetross
Chang H. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Republic of Korea. [email protected]
Yoonhyoung Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu 712-702, Republic of Korea. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We suggest that the linguistic characteristics of letters also need to be considered to fully understand how a reader processes printed words. For example, studies in Korean showed that unambiguity in the assignment of letters to their appropriate onset, vowel, or coda slot is one of the main sources of the letter-transposition effect. Indeed, the cognitive system that processes Korean is tuned to the structure of the Korean writing system.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 291 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, S. (1996) Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language 35(6):775–800.Google Scholar
Lee, C. H. & Taft, M. (2009) Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4):530–42. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002.Google Scholar
Lee, C. H. & Taft, M. (2011) Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 18(1):129–34. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y.Google Scholar
Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R. & Carreiras, M. (2010) The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 17(3):375–80.Google Scholar
Velan, H. & Frost, R. (2007) Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14(5):913–18.Google Scholar