Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Yang, Luodan
Dong, Yan
Wu, Chongyun
Li, Yong
Guo, Yichen
Yang, Baocheng
Zong, Xuemei
Hamblin, Michael R.
Liu, Timon C.‐Y.
and
Zhang, Quanguang
2019.
Photobiomodulation preconditioning prevents cognitive impairment in a neonatal rat model of hypoxia‐ischemia.
Journal of Biophotonics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 6,
Blunden, Anthea G.
Howe, Piers D. L.
and
Little, Daniel R.
2020.
Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 1,
p.
193.
Maister, Lara
De Beukelaer, Sophie
Longo, Matthew R.
and
Tsakiris, Manos
2021.
The Self in the Mind’s Eye: Revealing How We Truly See Ourselves Through Reverse Correlation.
Psychological Science,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 12,
p.
1965.
Target article
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Related commentaries (25)
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets
Context matters for attractiveness bias
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives
The out-of-my-league effect
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals
The wolf will live with the lamb
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?
Author response
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases