Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
O’Callaghan, Claire
Kveraga, Kestutis
Shine, James M.
Adams, Reginald B.
and
Bar, Moshe
2017.
Predictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder.
Consciousness and Cognition,
Vol. 47,
Issue. ,
p.
63.
González-Casillas, Adrían
Parra, Luis
Martin, Luis
Avila-Contreras, Cynthia
Ramirez-Pedraza, Raymundo
Vargas, Natividad
del Valle-Padilla, Juan Luis
and
Ramos, Félix
2018.
Towards a model of visual recognition based on neurosciences.
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures,
Vol. 25,
Issue. ,
p.
119.
González-Casillas, Adrián
Parra, Luis
Martin, Luis
Avila-Contreras, Cynthia
Ramirez-Pedraza, Raymundo
Vargas, Natividad
del Valle-Padilla, Juan Luis
and
Ramos, Félix
2018.
Towards a model of visual recognition based on neurosciences.
Procedia Computer Science,
Vol. 145,
Issue. ,
p.
214.
Matar, Elie
Phillips, Joseph R.
Martens, Kaylena A. Ehgoetz
Halliday, Glenda M.
and
Lewis, Simon J. G.
2019.
Impaired Color Discrimination—A Specific Marker of Hallucinations in Lewy Body Disorders.
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 5,
p.
257.
Klever, Lena
Mamassian, Pascal
and
Billino, Jutta
2022.
Age-related differences in visual confidence are driven by individual differences in cognitive control capacities.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
Hadders-Algra, Mijna
2022.
Human face and gaze perception is highly context specific and involves bottom-up and top-down neural processing.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
Vol. 132,
Issue. ,
p.
304.
Quesque, François
and
Rossetti, Yves
2023.
Are TPJs conflict detectors or solvers?.
Physics of Life Reviews,
Vol. 44,
Issue. ,
p.
163.
Oswald, Flora
and
Adams, Reginald B.
2023.
Feminist Social Vision: Seeing Through the Lens of Marginalized Perceivers.
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
332.
Kent, Ernest W.
2024.
The Roles of Representation in Visual Perception.
Vol. 486,
Issue. ,
p.
305.
Kveraga, Kestutis
2024.
Modeling Visual Aesthetics, Emotion, and Artistic Style.
p.
71.
Target article
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects
Related commentaries (34)
Acting is perceiving!
Action valence and affective perception
An action-specific effect on perception that avoids all pitfalls
Attention alters predictive processing
Attention and memory-driven effects in action studies
Attention and multisensory modulation argue against total encapsulation
Behavior is multiply determined, and perception has multiple components: The case of moral perception
Beyond perceptual judgment: Categorization and emotion shape what we see
Bottoms up! How top-down pitfalls ensnare speech perception researchers, too
Carving nature at its joints or cutting its effective loops? On the dangers of trying to disentangle intertwined mental processes
Cognition can affect perception: Restating the evidence of a top-down effect
Convergent evidence for top-down effects from the “predictive brain”1
Crossmodal processing and sensory substitution: Is “seeing” with sound and touch a form of perception or cognition?
Firestone & Scholl conflate two distinct issues
Fundamental differences between perception and cognition aside from cognitive penetrability
Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning
Hallucinations and mental imagery demonstrate top-down effects on visual perception
How cognition affects perception: Brain activity modelling to unravel top-down dynamics
Memory colours affect colour appearance
Not even wrong: The “it's just X” fallacy
Oh the irony: Perceptual stability is important for action
On the neural implausibility of the modular mind: Evidence for distributed construction dissolves boundaries between perception, cognition, and emotion
Perception, as you make it
Perception, cognition, and delusion
Representation of affect in sensory cortex
Studies on cognitively driven attention suggest that late vision is cognitively penetrated, whereas early vision is not
Task demand not so damning: Improved techniques that mitigate demand in studies that support top-down effects
The anatomical and physiological properties of the visual cortex argue against cognitive penetration
The distinction between perception and judgment, if there is one, is not clear and intuitive
The El Greco fallacy and pupillometry: Pupillary evidence for top-down effects on perception
The folly of boxology
The myth of pure perception
Tweaking the concepts of perception and cognition
What draws the line between perception and cognition?
Author response
Seeing and thinking: Foundational issues and empirical horizons