Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T05:50:36.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

The development and evaluation of multiple regression equations based on four common nutritional analysis packages to predict the metabolisable energy density of diets fed to grower/finisher and adult pigs and their use for rat and mouse diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2025

Graham Tobin*
Affiliation:
The Orchard, Weeping Cross, Bodicote, United Kingdom, OX15 4EE
Annette Schuhmacher
Affiliation:
ssniff Spezialdiaeten, Ferdinand-Gabriel Weg 16, 59494 Soest, Germany
Tomasz Górecki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 4, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
Łukasz Smaga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 4, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
*
Corresponding Author: Dr Graham Tobin, The Orchard, Weeping Cross, Bodicote, United Kingdom, OX15 4EE, [email protected], +44 1295 262064
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have used multiple regression analyses to develop a series of metabolisable energy (ME) prediction equations from chemical analyses of pig diets that can be extended to murine diets. We compiled four datasets from an extensive range of published metabolism studies with grower/finisher and adult pigs. The analytes in the datasets were increasingly complex, comprising: 1. the proximate or Weende analysis, 2. the previous analysis but with neutral detergent fibre (NDF) replacing crude fibre, 3. the NDF package plus starch, 4. the NDF package plus starch and sugars. Diet manufacturers routinely provide most of the analytes for batches of murine diet, or they are easily obtainable. The study uniquely compares the four analytical packages side-by-side. The number of records in the datasets varies from 367 to 827. With increasing analytical complexity, adjusted R2 values for ME prediction improved from 0.751 to 0.869, and the mean absolute error from 0.422 to 0.289 kJ/g. Overall, the models’ prediction interval (PI) improved from 1 to 0.7 kJ/g, which is ± 7% to 5% for a typical dietary ME density of 14.8 kJ/g. Although prediction accuracy increases as one extends the range and complexity of the analytes measured, the improvement is slight and may not justify the substantial increase in analytical cost. The equations were validated for use on future data sets by k-fold analysis. Although the equations are developed from pig data, they are suitable for rat and mouse diets, based on comparable digestibility measurements, and substantially improve existing methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society