Nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), also called mRNA surveillance, is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that degrades mRNAs that prematurely terminate translation. To date, the pathway in mammalian cells has been shown to depend on the presence of a cis-acting destabilizing element that usually consists of an exon–exon junction generated by the process of pre-mRNA splicing. Whether or not mRNAs that derive from naturally intronless genes, that is, mRNAs not formed by the process of splicing, are also subject to NMD has yet to be investigated. The possibility of NMD is certainly reasonable considering that mRNAs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are subject to NMD even though most derive from naturally intronless genes. In fact, mRNAs of S. cerevisiae generally harbor a loosely defined splicing-independent destabilizing element that has been proposed to function in NMD analogously to the spliced exon–exon junction of mammalian mRNAs. Here, we demonstrate that nonsense codons introduced into naturally intronless genes encoding mouse heat shock protein 70 or human histone H4 fail to elicit NMD. Failure is most likely because each mRNA lacks a cis-acting destabilizing element, because insertion of a spliceable intron a sufficient distance downstream of a nonsense codon within either gene is sufficient to elicit NMD.

The human immunodeficiency virus type-1 matrix protein (HIV-1 MA) is a multifunctional structural protein synthesized as part of the Pr55 gag polyprotein. We have used in vitro genetic selection to identify an RNA consensus sequence that specifically interacts with MA (Kd = 5 × 10−7 M). This 13-nt MA binding consensus sequence bears a high degree of homology (77%) to a region (nt 1433–1446) within the POL open reading frame of the HIV-1 genome (consensus sequence from 38 HIV-1 strains). Chemical interference experiments identified the nucleotides within the MA binding consensus sequence involved in direct contact with MA. We further demonstrate that this RNA–protein interaction is mediated through a stretch of basic amino acids within MA. Mutations that disrupt the interaction between MA and its RNA binding site within the HIV-1 genome resulted in a measurable decrease in viral replication.

A great deal of progress in elucidating the mechanisms of spliceosome assembly has been achieved by analyzing the A, B, and C spliceosomal complexes on native polyacrylamide gels. In contrast, progress in understanding the earliest spliceosomal complex E has been hampered because this complex dissociates on native gels and is difficult to detect by other methods. Here we report conditions for resolving the spliceosomal complex E using a native horizontal agarose mini-gel system. This system also provides a simple alternative to polyacrylamide gels for resolving the ATP-dependent spliceosomal complexes.

In higher plants, RNA–DNA interactions can trigger de novo methylation of genomic sequences via a process that is termed RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). In potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd)-infected tobacco plants, this process can potentially lead to methylation of all C residues at symmetrical and nonsymmetrical sites within chromosomal inserts that consist of multimers of the 359-bp-long PSTVd cDNA. Using PSTVd cDNA subfragments, we found that genomic targets with as few as 30 nt of sequence complementarity to the viroid RNA are detected and methylated. Genomic sequencing analyses of genome-integrated 30- and 60-bp-long PSTVd subfragments demonstrated that de novo cytosine methylation is not limited to the canonical CpG, CpNpG sites. Sixty-base-pair-long PSTVd cDNA constructs appeared to be densely methylated in nearly all tobacco leaf cells. With the 30-bp-long PSTVd-specific construct, the proportion of cells displaying dense transgene methylation was significantly reduced, suggesting that a minimal target size of about 30 bp is necessary for RdDM. The methylation patterns observed for two different 60-bp constructs further suggested that the sequence identity of the target may influence the methylation mechanism. Finally, a link between viroid pathogenicity and PSTVd RNA-directed methylation of host sequences is proposed.

The ability of different picornavirus internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements to direct initiation of protein synthesis has been assayed in different cell lines in the presence and absence of viral proteases that inhibit cap-dependent protein synthesis. Reporter plasmids that express dicistronic mRNAs, containing different IRES elements, with the general structure CAT/IRES/LUC, have been assayed. In each plasmid, the CAT sequence encodes chloramphenicol acetyl transferase and the LUC sequence encodes luciferase. The poliovirus (PV) 2A protease and the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) Lb protease induce the cleavage of the translation initiation factor eIF4G and hence inhibit the activity of the cap-binding complex, eIF4F. In human osteosarcoma (HTK-143) cells, each of the various IRES elements functioned efficiently. In these cells, the co-expression of the viral proteases severely inhibited the expression of CAT, but the proteases had little effect on the activities of the various IRES elements. In contrast, in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, the efficiencies of the different IRES elements varied significantly, whereas, in normal rat kidney (NRK) cells, each of the IRES elements was relatively inefficient. In both BHK and NRK cells, the activities of those IRES elements that functioned inefficiently were strongly stimulated by the co-expression of the PV 2A or FMDV Lb proteases. This stimulation was independent of the loss of cap-dependent protein synthesis and was not achieved by the co-expression of the C-terminal fragment of eIF4G. The results suggest that the PV 2A and FMDV Lb proteases induce the cleavage of another cellular protein, in addition to eIF4G, which influences IRES function.

The yeast PRP44 gene, alternatively named as BRR2, SLT22, RSS1, or SNU246, encodes a 246-kDa protein with putative RNA helicase function during pre-mRNA splicing. The protein is a typical DEAD/H family member, but unlike most other members of this family, it contains two putative RNA helicase domains, each with a highly conserved ATPase motif. Prior to this study little was known about functional roles for these two domains. We present genetic and biochemical evidence that ATPase motifs of only the first helicase domain are required for cell viability and pre-mRNA splicing. Overexpression of mutations in the first domain results in a dominant negative phenotype, and extracts from these mutant strains inhibit in vitro pre-mRNA splicing. In vitro analyses of affinity purified proteins revealed that only the first helicase domain possesses poly (U)-dependent ATPase activity. Overexpression of a dominant negative protein in vivo reduces the relative abundance of free U4 and U6 snRNA with a concomitant accumulation of the U4/U6 duplex. Accumulation of the U4/U6 duplex was relieved by overexpression of wild-type Prp44p. Three DEAD/H box proteins, Prp16p, Prp22p and Prp44p, have previously been shown to affect U4/U6 unwinding activity in vitro. The possible role of these proteins in mediating this reaction in vivo was explored following induced expression of ATPase domain mutants in each of these. Although overexpression of the mutant form of either Prp16p, Prp22p, or Prp44p was lethal, only expression of the mutant Prp44p resulted in accumulation of the U4/U6 helix. Our results, when combined with previously published in vitro results, support a direct role for Prp44p in unwinding of the U4/U6 helix.

Maturation of the large subunit rRNAs includes a series of cleavages that result in removal of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) that separates mature 5.8S and 25/28S rRNAs. Previous work demonstrated that formation of higher order secondary structure within the assembling pre-ribosomal particle is a prerequisite for accurate and efficient pre-rRNA processing. To date, it is not clear which specific sequences or secondary structures are required for processing. Two alternative secondary structure models exist for Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITS2. Chemical and enzymatic structure probing and phylogenetic comparisons resulted in one structure (Yeh & Lee, J Mol Biol, 1990, 211:699–712) referred to here as the “hairpin model.” More recently, an alternate folded structure was proposed (Joseph et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27:4533–4540), called here the “ring model.” We have used a functional genetic assay to examine the potential significance of these predicted structures in processing. Our data indicate that elements of both structural models are important in efficient processing. Mutations that prevent formation of ring-specific structures completely blocked production of mature 25S rRNA, whereas those that primarily disrupt hairpin elements resulted in reduced levels of mature product. Based on these results, we propose a dynamic conformational model for the role of ITS2 in processing: Initial formation of the ring structure may be required for essential, early events in processing complex assembly and may be followed by an induced transition to the hairpin structure that facilitates subsequent processing events. In this model, yeast ITS2 elements may provide in cis certain of the functions proposed for vertebrate U8 snoRNA acting in trans.

A significant fraction of the bases in a folded, structured RNA molecule participate in noncanonical base pairing interactions, often in the context of internal loops or multi-helix junction loops. The appearance of each new high-resolution RNA structure provides welcome data to guide efforts to understand and predict RNA 3D structure, especially when the RNA in question is a functionally conserved molecule. The recent publication of the crystal structure of the “Loop E” region of bacterial 5S ribosomal RNA is such an event [Correll CC, Freeborn B, Moore PB, Steitz TA, 1997, Cell 91:705–712]. In addition to providing more examples of already established noncanonical base pairs, such as purine–purine sheared pairings, trans-Hoogsteen UA, and GU wobble pairs, the structure provides the first high-resolution views of two new purine–purine pairings and a new GU pairing. The goal of the present analysis is to expand the capabilities of both chemical probing and phylogenetic analysis to predict with greater accuracy the structures of RNA molecules. First, in light of existing chemical probing data, we investigate what lessons could be learned regarding the interpretation of this widely used method of RNA structure probing. Then we analyze the 3D structure with reference to molecular phylogeny data (assuming conservation of function) to discover what alternative base pairings are geometrically compatible with the structure. The comparisons between previous modeling efforts and crystal structures show that the intricate involvements of ions and water molecules in the maintenance of non-Watson–Crick pairs render the process of correctly identifying the interacting sites in such pairs treacherous, except in cases of trans-Hoogsteen A/U or sheared A/G pairs for the adenine N1 site. The phylogenetic analysis identifies A/A, A/C, A/U and C/A, C/C, and C/U pairings isosteric with sheared A/G, as well as A/A and A/C pairings isosteric with both G/U and G/G bifurcated pairings. Thus, each non-Watson–Crick pair could be characterized by a phylogenetic signature of variations between isosteric-like pairings. In addition to the conservative changes, which form a dictionary of pairings isosterically compatible with those observed in the crystal structure, concerted changes involving several base pairs also occur. The latter covariations may indicate transitions between related but distinctive motifs within the loop E of 5S ribosomal RNA.

Ribosomal RNAs are generally synthesized as long, primary transcripts that must be extensively processed to generate the mature, functional species. In Escherichia coli, it is known that the initial 30S precursor is cleaved during its synthesis by the endonuclease RNase III to generate precursors to the 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNAs. However, despite extensive study, the processes by which these intermediate products are converted to their mature forms are poorly understood. In this article, we describe the maturation of 23S rRNA. Based on Northern analysis of RNA isolated from a variety of mutant strains lacking one or multiple ribonucleases, we show that maturation of the 3′ terminus requires the action of RNase T, an enzyme previously implicated in the end turnover of tRNA and in the maturation of small, stable RNAs. Although other exoribonucleases can participate in shortening the 3′ end of the initial RNase III cleavage product, RNase T is required for removal of the last few residues. In the absence of RNase T, 23S rRNA products with extra 3′ residues accumulate and are incorporated into ribosomes, with only small effects on cell growth. Purified RNase T accurately and efficiently converts these immature ribosomes to their mature forms in vitro, whereas free RNA is processed relatively poorly. In vivo, the processing defect at the 3′ end has no effect on 5′ maturation, indicating that the latter process proceeds independently. We also find that a portion of the 23S rRNA that accumulates in many RNase T− cells becomes polyadenylated because of the action of poly(A) polymerase I. The requirement for RNase T in 23S rRNA maturation is discussed in relation to a model in which only this enzyme, among the eight exoribonucleases present in E. coli, is able to efficiently remove nucleotides close to the double-stranded stem generated by the pairing of the 5′ and 3′ termini of most stable RNAs.

Maturation of 18S rRNA and biogenesis of the 40S ribosomes in yeast requires a large number of trans-acting factors, including the U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (U3 snoRNP), and the recently characterized cyclase-like protein Rcl1p. U3 snoRNP is a key particle orchestrating early 35S rRNA cleavage events. A unique property of Rcl1p is that it specifically associates with U3 snoRNP, but this association appears to occur only at the level of nascent ribosomes and not with the U3 monoparticle. Here we report the characterization of Bms1p, a protein that associates with Rcl1p in multiple structures, including a specific complex sedimenting at around 10S. Like Rcl1p, Bms1p is an essential, evolutionarily conserved, nucleolar protein, and its depletion interferes with processing of the 35S pre-rRNA at sites A0, A1, and A2, and the formation of 40S subunits. The N-terminal domain of Bms1p has structural features found in regulatory GTPases and we demonstrate that mutations of amino acids implicated in GTP/GDP binding affect Bms1p activity in vivo. The results indicate that Bms1p may act as a molecular switch during maturation of the 40S ribosomal subunit in the nucleolus.

The cap structure and the poly(A) tail synergistically activate mRNA translation in vivo. Recent work using Saccharomyces cerevisiae spheroplasts and a yeast cell-free translation system revealed that the poly(A) tail can function as an independent promotor for ribosome recruitment, to internal initiation sites within an mRNA. This raises the question of how regulatory upstream open reading frames and translational repressor proteins binding to the 5′ UTR can function, as well as how regulated polyadenylation can support faithful activation of protein synthesis. We investigated the function of the regulatory upstream open reading frame 4 from the yeast GCN 4 gene and the effect of IRP-1 binding to an iron-responsive element introduced into the 5′ UTR of reporter mRNAs. Both manipulations effectively block cap-dependent translation, whereas ribosome recruitment promoted by the poly(A) tail under noncompetitive conditions can efficiently bypass both blocks. We show that the synergistic use of both, the cap structure and the poly-A tail enforced by mRNA competition reinstates the full extent of translational control by both types of 5′ UTR regulatory elements. With a view towards regulated polyadenylation, we studied the function of poly(A) tails of defined length on the translation of capped mRNAs. We find that poly(A) tail elongation increases translational efficiency, particularly under competitive conditions. Our results integrate recent findings on the function of the poly(A) tail into an understanding of translational control.

Previous work from this laboratory (Nurse et al., RNA, 1995, 1:102–112) established that TruB, a pseudouridine (Ψ) synthase from Escherichia coli, was able to make Ψ55 in tRNA transcripts but not in transcripts of full-length or fragmented 16S or 23S ribosomal RNAs. By deletion of the truB gene, we now show that TruB is the only protein in E. coli able to make Ψ55 in vivo. Lack of TruB and Ψ55 did not affect the exponential growth rate but did confer a strong selective disadvantage on the mutant when it was competed against wild-type. The negative selection did not appear to be acting at either the exponential or stationary phase. Transformation with a plasmid vector conferring carbenicillin resistance and growth in carbenicillin markedly increased the selective disadvantage, as did growth at 42 °C, and both together were approximately additive such that three cycles of competitive growth sufficed to reduce the mutant strain to ∼0.2% of its original value. The most striking finding was that all growth effects could be reversed by transformation with a plasmid carrying a truB gene coding for a D48C mutation in TruB. Direct analysis showed that this mutant did not make Ψ55 under the conditions of the competition experiment. Therefore, the growth defect due to the lack of TruB must be due to the lack of some other function of the protein, possibly an RNA chaperone activity, but not to the absence of Ψ55.

Translation termination in eukaryotes requires a codon-specific (class-I) release factor, eRF1, and a GTP/GDP-dependent (class-II) release factor, eRF3. The model of “molecular mimicry between release factors and tRNA” predicts that eRF1 mimics tRNA to read the stop codon and that eRF3 mimics elongation factor EF-Tu to bring eRF1 to the A site of the ribosome for termination of protein synthesis. In this study, we set up three systems, in vitro affinity binding, a yeast two-hybrid system, and in vitro competition assay, to determine the eRF3-binding site of eRF1 using the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins and creating systematic deletions in eRF1. The in vitro affinity binding experiments demonstrated that the predicted tRNA-mimicry truncation of eRF1 (Sup45) forms a stable complex with eRF3 (Sup35). All three test systems revealed that the most critical binding site is located at the C-terminal region of eRF1, which is conserved among eukaryotic eRF1s and rich in acidic amino acids. To our surprise, however, the C-terminal deletion eRF1 seems to be sufficient for cell viability in spite of the severe defect in eRF3 binding when expressed in a temperature-sensitive sup45 mutant of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These results cannot be accounted for by the simple “eRF3–EF-Tu mimicry” model, but may provide new insight into the eRF3 function for translation termination in eukaryotes.

RNase L and Ire1p are members of a superfamily of regulated endoribonucleases that play essential roles in mediating diverse types of cellular stress responses. 2′-5′ oligoadenylates, produced in response to interferon treatment and viral double-stranded RNA, are necessary to activate RNase L. In contrast, unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum activate Ire1p, a transmembrane serine/threonine kinase and endoribonuclease. To probe their similarities and differences, molecular properties of wild-type and mutant forms of human RNase L and yeast Ire1p were compared. Surprisingly, RNase L and Ire1p showed mutually exclusive RNA substrate specificity and partially overlapping but not identical requirements for phylogenetically conserved amino acid residues in their nuclease domains. A functional model for RNase L was generated based on the comparative analysis with Ire1p that assigns novel roles for ankyrin repeats and kinase-like domains.

The SRm160/300 splicing coactivator, which consists of the serine/arginine (SR)-related nuclear matrix protein of 160 kDa and a 300-kDa nuclear matrix antigen, functions in splicing by promoting critical interactions between splicing factors bound to pre-mRNA, including snRNPs and SR family proteins. In this article we report the isolation of a cDNA encoding the 300-kDa antigen and investigate the activity of it and SRm160 in splicing. Like SRm160, the 300-kDa antigen contains domains rich in alternating S and R residues but lacks an RNA recognition motif; the protein is accordingly named “SRm300.” SRm300 also contains a novel and highly conserved N-terminal domain, several unique repeated motifs rich in S, R, and proline residues, and two very long polyserine tracts. Surprisingly, specific depletion of SRm300 does not prevent the splicing of pre-mRNAs shown previously to require SRm160/300. Addition of recombinant SRm160 alone to SRm160/300-depleted reactions specifically activates splicing. The results indicate that SRm160 may be the more critical component of the SRm160/300 coactivator in the splicing of SRm160/300-dependent pre-mRNAs.

This review is occasioned by the fact that the problem of translation, which has simmered on the biological sidelines for the last 40 years, is about to erupt center stage—thanks to the recent spectacular advances in ribosome structure. This most complex, beautiful, and fascinating of cellular mechanisms, the translation apparatus, is also the most important. Translation not only defines gene expression, but it is the sine qua non without which modern (protein-based) cells would not have come into existence. Yet from the start, the problem of translation has been misunderstood—a reflection of the molecular perspective that dominated Biology of the last century. In that the our conception of translation will play a significant role in creating the structure that is 21st century Biology, it is critical that our current (and fundamentally flawed) view of translation be understood for what it is and be reformulated to become an all-embracing perspective about which 21st century Biology can develop. Therefore, the present review is both a retrospective and a plea to biologists to establish a new evolutionary, RNA-World-centered concept of translation. What is needed is an evolutionarily oriented perspective that, first and foremost, focuses on the nature (and origin) of a primitive translation apparatus, the apparatus that transformed an ancient evolutionary era of nucleic acid life, the RNA World, into the world of modern cells.

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) trigger hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA at the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center mediated by one of the three termination codons. In eukaryotes, apart from catalyzing the translation termination reaction, eRF1 binds to and activates another factor, eRF3, which is a ribosome-dependent and eRF1-dependent GTPase. Because peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and GTP hydrolysis could be uncoupled in vitro, we suggest that the two main functions of eRF1 are associated with different domains of the eRF1 protein. We show here by deletion analysis that human eRF1 is composed of two physically separated and functionally distinct domains. The “core” domain is fully competent in ribosome binding and termination-codon-dependent peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, and encompasses the N-terminal and middle parts of the polypeptide chain. The C-terminal one-third of eRF1 binds to eRF3 in vivo in the absence of the core domain, but both domains are required to activate eRF3 GTPase in the ribosome. The calculated isoelectric points of the core and C domains are 9.74 and 4.23, respectively. This highly uneven charge distribution between the two domains implies that electrostatic interdomain interaction may affect the eRF1 binding to the ribosome and eRF3, its activity in the termination reaction and activation of eRF3 GTPase. The positively charged core of eRF1 may interact with negatively charged rRNA and peptidyl-tRNA phosphate backbones at the ribosomal eRF1 binding site and exhibit RNA-binding ability. The structural and functional dissimilarity of the core and eRF3-binding domains implies that evolutionarily eRF1 originated as a product of gene fusion.

We have previously shown that the yeast gene PUS1 codes for a tRNA:pseudouridine synthase and that recombinant Pus1p catalyzes, in an intron-dependent way, the formation of Ψ34 and Ψ36 in the anticodon loop of the yeast minor tRNAIle in vitro (Simos G et al., 1996, EMBO J 15:2270–2284). Using a set of T7 transcripts of different tRNA genes, we now demonstrate that yeast pseudouridine synthase 1 catalyzes in vitro pseudouridine formation at positions 27 and/or 28 in several yeast cytoplasmic tRNAs and at position 35 in the intron-containing tRNATyr (anticodon GUA). Thus, Pus1p not only displays a broad specificity toward the RNA substrates, but is also capable of catalyzing the pseudouridine (Ψ) formation at distinct noncontiguous sites within the same tRNA molecule. The cell-free extract prepared from the yeast strain bearing disrupted gene PUS1 is unable to catalyze the formation of Ψ27, Ψ28, Ψ34, and Ψ36 in vitro, however, Ψ35 formation in the intron-containing tRNATyr(GUA) remains unaffected. Thus, in yeast, only one gene product accounts for tRNA pseudouridylation at positions 27, 28, 34, and 36, whereas for position 35 in tRNATyr, another site-specific tRNA:pseudouridine synthase with overlapping specificity exists. Mapping of pseudouridine residues present in various tRNAs extracted from the PUS1-disrupted strain confirms the in vitro data obtained with the recombinant Pus1p. In addition, they suggest that Pus1p is implicated in modification at positions U26, U65, and U67 in vivo.

Through a combination of in vitro snRNP reconstitution, photocross-linking and immunoprecipitation techniques, we have investigated the interaction of proteins with the spliceosomal U6 snRNA in U6 snRNPs, U4/U6 di-snRNPs and U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs. Of the seven Lsm (Sm-like) proteins that associate specifically with this spliceosomal snRNA, three were shown to contact the RNA directly, and to maintain contact as the U6 RNA is incorporated into tri-snRNPs. In tri-snRNPs, the U5 snRNP protein Prp8 contacts position 54 of U6, which is in the conserved region that contributes to the formation of the catalytic core of the spliceosome. Other tri-snRNP-specific contacts were also detected, indicating the dynamic nature of protein interactions with this important snRNA. The uridine-rich extreme 3′ end of U6 RNA was shown to be essential but not sufficient for the association of the Lsm proteins. Interestingly, the Lsm proteins associate efficiently with the 3′ half of U6, which contains the 3′ stem-loop and uridine-rich 3′ end, suggesting that the Lsm and Sm proteins may recognize similar features in RNAs.

We describe a fast and simple one-step affinity-purification method for the isolation of specific RNA-binding proteins. An in vitro-transcribed hybrid RNA consisting of an aptamer sequence with high binding specificity to the antibiotic streptomycin and a putative protein-binding RNA sequence is incubated with crude extract. After complex formation, the sample is applied to an affinity column containing streptomycin immobilized to Sepharose. The binding of the in vitro-assembled RNA–protein complex to streptomycin-Sepharose is mediated by the aptamer RNA and the specifically bound proteins are recovered from the affinity matrix by elution with the antibiotic. Employing two well-characterized RNA–protein interactions, we tested the performance of this new method. The spliceosomal U1A protein and the bacteriophage MS2 coat protein could be isolated via their appropriate RNA motif containing hybrid RNA from crude yeast extracts in high yield and purity after only one round of affinity purification. As the purification principle is independent of the extract source, this new affinity chromatography strategy that makes use of an in vitro-selected antibiotic-binding RNA as a tag, “StreptoTag,” should be applicable to extracts from other organisms as well. Therefore, we propose StreptoTag to be a versatile tool for the isolation of unknown RNA-binding proteins.