Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Religious Studies
  4. Volume 22
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 22 - March 1986

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Front matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Articles

  • Psychology, Ontology and Zen Soteriology

  • Hsueh–Li Cheng
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. 459-472

  • During the past few decades, Zen (Ch'an) Buddhism has been the most popular Buddhist school in the West and many scholars have expounded the essence of Zen. One of the most well–known expositions is D. T. Suzuki's psychological interpretation. Wu–nien in Zen is identified by him with the unconscious, and satori is seen as the psychological leaping of the unconscious. Other scholars contend that Zen has its ontological roots and should be understood ontologically rather than psychologically. Zen Buddhists are said to be pilgrims of the absolute, and Zen is seen as a search for pure being.

Back matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Articles

  • Mellor's ‘Bridge–Hand’ Argument

  • B. L. Hebblethwaite
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. 473-479

  • In his article ‘God and Probability’, 1 Hugh Mellor introduced the notion of the ‘bridge-hand fallacy’, allegedly committed by those who think they can appeal to probabilities in arguments for design. I should like to give this notion another airing, partly because of its recent criticism in two interesting books - R. G. Swinburne' The Existence of God and D. J. Bartholomew's God of Chance - and partly because it seems worth asking how it fares in relation to the most recent examples of design argument, namely those which appeal to the so-called ‘anthropic principle’ in cosmology.

Front matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 3-4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Back matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 3-4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. b1-b10
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Front matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • RES volume 22 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 October 2008, pp. b1-b6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 3