Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T17:09:48.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Did the Campaign End? An Examination of the Timing of Vote Returns in the 2008 General Election in Washington State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2012

Kevin A. Pirch
Kevin A. Pirch*
Affiliation:
Eastern Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the past decade the United States has seen an increase in alternative forms to Election Day voting, including voting by mail. Voting by mail has spurred a number of studies concerning the effects it has on voter turnout and other aspects of voting. However, one important facet of voting by mail has not been examined—when people decide to send in their vote. Because ballots are mailed out weeks before the election, voting by mail creates, in effect, a rolling Election Day. This could have profound effects for campaigns as candidates must determine when to use campaign resources and campaign to an electorate who might have already voted. Using data from the 2008 general election in Washington State, this study examines when voters turned in their ballots and determines if age, partisanship, or other factors play a role in the timing of turning in a ballot.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 711 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American FactFinder. 2009a. Spokane County, Washington. http://factfinder.census.gov (June 5, 2012).Google Scholar
American Factfinder. 2009b. Washington State. http://factfinder.census.gov (June 5, 2012).Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam. J., Burns, Nancy, and Traugott, Michael W.. 2001. “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (2): 178–97.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. 2000. “Going Postal: How All-Mail Elections Influence Turnout.” Political Behavior 22 (September): 223–39.Google Scholar
Richey, Sean 2005. “Who Votes Alone? The Impact of Voting by Mail on Public Discussion.” Australian Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 435–42.Google Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. 2004. “Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (2): 89–93.Google Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L. 2009. “A Panacea for Voter Fatigue? Vote by Mail in the State of Oregon.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 37 (2): 195–203.Google Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L., and Burchette, Justin. 1997. “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate Election in the State of Oregon.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30 (2): 53–57.Google Scholar
Southwell, Priscilla L., and Burchette, Justin. 2000. “Does Changing the Rules Change the Players? The Effect of All-Mail Elections on the Composition of the Electorate.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (September): 837–45.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2004. “Election Time: Normative Implications of Temporal Properties of the Election Process in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 98 (1): 51–64.Google Scholar
Washington Secretary of State. n.d. “Frequently Asked Questions on Vote by Mail.” http://wei.secstate.wa.gov/osos/en/voterinformation/Pages/VotebyMailFAQ.aspx (Accessed July 29, 2011).Google Scholar
Washington Secretary of State. 2007. “Washington State's Vote by Mail Experience.” http://secstate.wa.gov/documentvault/WashingtonStatesVotebyMailExperienceOctober2007-2066.pdf (June 5, 2012).Google Scholar