Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:37:48.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yard Sign Displays and the Enthusiasm Gap in the 2008 and 2010 Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2012

Todd Makse  and
Anand E. Sokhey
Todd Makse
Affiliation:
Susquehanna University
Anand E. Sokhey
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the run up to the 2010 midterm elections, pundits and politicos often talked of an “enthusiasm gap” between Republicans and Democrats. Although conventional treatments have typically equated these gaps with changes in turnout and the composition of the electorate, we argue that the term better describes the participatory patterns of highly engaged voters. Using multiple data sources, including a geocoded, county-wide study that tracked yard sign displays between 2008 and 2010, we examine the visible evidence of enthusiasm gaps in voters' neighborhoods. Our findings echo recent narratives, yet suggest that scholars have missed important dimensions in their examinations of these “wave” elections.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 694 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul, Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David. 2011. Change and Continuity in the 2008 and 2010 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Joby O. 2009. “Posted: Reading the Landscape of the Domestic Political Campaign Signs.” Journal of Cultural Geography 26 (2): 223–41.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul, Dalton, Russell, Huckfeldt, Robert, and Nichols, Stephen M.. 1994. “The Social-Embededness of Political Cleavages.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus. 1966. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” In Elections and the Political Order, eds. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E.. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L. 2008. “Testing the Reciprocal Effects of Campaign Participation.” Political Behavior 30 (3): 277–96.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, Tolbert, Caroline J., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2009. “Political Engagement, Mobilization, and Direct Democracy” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (1): 98–118.Google Scholar
Flanigan, William, and Zingale, Nancy. 2010. Political Behavior of the American Electorate, 12th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James. 2006. “Habitual Voting and Behavioral Turnout.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 335–44.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan, Green, Donald, and Shachar, Ron. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 540–50.Google Scholar
Glaser, William A. 1962. “Fluctuations in Turnout.” In Public Opinion and Congressional Elections, eds. McPhee, William and Glaser, William. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, and Gerber, Alan. 2008. Get Out the Vote! How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hawkings, D., and Nutting, B.. 2003. CQ's Politics in America 2004: The 108th Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hill, David. 2006. American Voter Turnout: An Institutional Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 1986. Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell J., and Levine, Jeffrey. 1995. “Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 1025–54.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86 (1): 70–86.Google Scholar
Laband, David, Pandit, Ram, Sophocleus, John, and Laband, Anne M.. 2009. “Patriotism, Pigskins, and Politics: An Empirical Examination of Expressive Voting Behavior.” Public Choice 138 (1): 97–108.Google Scholar
Lacy, Dean. 2001. “A Theory of Non-Separable Preferences in Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 239–58.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, and Brown, Courtney. 1987. “Political Context and Attitude Change.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 471–90.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Sokhey, Anand. 2010. “Revisiting the Divisive Primary Hypothesis: 2008 and the Clinton-Obama Nomination Battle.” American Politics Research 38 (2): 233–65.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 838–55.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panagopolous, Costas. 2009. “Street Fight: The Impact of A Street Sign Campaign on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 309–13.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric. 2002. “Becoming a Habitual Voter: Inertia, Resources, and Growth in Young Adulthood.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1966. “Political Attitudes and the Local Community.” American Political Science Review 60 (3): 640–54.Google Scholar
Sanders, Keith R., and Kaid, Lynda Lee. 1981. “Political Rallies: Their Uses and Effects.” Communication Studies 32 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Verhulst, Joris, and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2009. “The First Time Is the Hardest: A Cross-National and Cross-Issue Comparison of First-Time Protest Participants.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 455–84.Google Scholar