The aim of this article is to provide UK-based primary health care research and development workers with a review of the current range of published, aggregated socio-demographic indicators that can be combined with health and health care datasets, for the purposes of monitoring locality health profiles and planning primary health care. Non-UK readers should nevertheless find the review of some relevance to their own national contexts.

There is an increasing range of resources available for such purposes and many of these datasets are equally useful outside of geographic work. The 2001 census introduced important changes to what routine data are available, as will the 2011 census. These changes have been paralleled by developments in the availability of socio-demographic indicators and the increasing popularity of geographic information systems. Health data can now be combined with those from socio-demographic more efficiently to produce what are termed value-added datasets.

We review recent and planned developments in key data sources currently available in the UK and examine they can be used to monitor inequalities in primary health care inequalities and their role in the integration of primary health care needs mapping and forecasting with the spatial planning of areas undergoing regeneration.

Recent and planned developments in the availability of both socio-demographic datasets in tandem with parallel developments in spatial technologies have provided a flexible, potent geographical methodology for primary health care research and development. The current consultation process for the 2011 census provides those involved with primary health care research and development an opportunity to influence future developments.

To enhance the effectiveness of smoking cessation communication in primary care by gaining insight into the motivations and perceptions of smokers and ex-smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Stopping smoking is the single most important action smokers with COPD can take to improve their health. A Cochrane systematic review identified the need for more research into effective smoking cessation approaches for patients with COPD.

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with COPD patients in South Yorkshire undertaken as part of the formal evaluation of an innovative rehabilitation program (‘Breathing Space’).

Patients with COPD (current and ex-smokers) who were invited to attend a program of rehabilitation or support at Breathing Space

Current smokers tended to deny the contribution of smoking to their COPD. A low level of acknowledgement of the association between smoking and COPD was demonstrated, particularly by long-term COPD patients. Participants described health and money as the most important motivators in stopping smoking. An overly directive or ritualistic approach by health professionals was perceived as counter-productive. Participants perceived that smokers were deterred from accessing care through embarrassment and fear of discrimination.

A direct but supportive approach is likely to be effective when discussing the association between smoking and COPD with patients. Assisting smokers to acknowledge the objective dangers and the personal risk of smoking is indicated. Approaching smoking as an objective condition to be solved as a joint enterprise between patient and clinician can reduce message avoidance while inducing a sense of personal control, thereby increasing successful quitting.

Public involvement, both in the National Health Service (NHS) and in clinical research, is promoted as an important democratic principle. The declared aims are to reduce professional autocracy and allow a broader ownership of the research agenda; also to improve the design of, and recruitment and retention of patients to, clinical studies. There have been a number of national initiatives in the UK to improve public input to clinical research activities, but very few reports of effective and sustainable partnerships over time. This study reports the evaluation of one example, which is embedded in the NHS and university partnerships in the Norfolk area of England.

Evaluate:

• Putting principles into practice of public involvement in research over a 5 year period for one specific project (Patient and Public Involvement in Research).

• How the model contributes to, and impacts upon, all stages of the research process.

• Attitudes of the research community and lay volunteers to their mutual experiences of public involvement.

• Key factors and strengths of this project, and areas for improvement.

A mixed methods approach related to the 5 years from start of 2003 to end of 2007. This used descriptive statistics of volunteer activity, interviews with key stakeholders (13), questionnaires (53% response rate), and focus group with 10 volunteers to explore emergent themes. We analysed findings using a policy framework approach.

About 47 of the original 55 volunteers remained on the panel after 5 years. All have undertaken training, 38% have been involved in the full range of research activities offered, and 75% have attended at least one research project meeting. Some are active in governance, ethics, and advisory committees.

Both the research community and the volunteers are very positive about the project. The researchers find it provides well prepared personnel, and gives a speedy and efficient way of fulfilling the expectations of funders for lay input. The volunteers find it gives them important opportunities to influence the quality of research and thus support improvements in patient care. Areas for improvement include increasing social diversity among the volunteers, and improving feedback on input from volunteers, without which volunteers tend to lose confidence and motivation.

Long-term sustainable and valuable public input to research is possible. Key factors are committing resources, embedding the service in the infrastructure of a research consortium, and ongoing responsiveness by NHS staff and researchers. Additional activity to recruit and support access may be needed to attract people from a broad range of sociodemographic backgrounds. Some volunteers want more involvement than this model currently offers.

Guidelines may improve clinical outcomes for depression, but whether they are followed in primary care is uncertain.

To assess general practioners (GPs’) adherence to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for managing depression in adults (2004).

Anonymized Questionnaire Survey.

Thirty-eight partnerships within one primary care trust in England.

Focused questionnaire incorporating measurable criteria, posted to GPs in May 2007.

The response rate was 67% (143/215 GPs). GPs followed NICE guidelines when screening for depression in patients with physical illness, using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants appropriately and referring to counselling and secondary care. However, 48% GPs did not screen patients with a history of depression, 44% discontinued medication too soon and 38% avoided prescribing for ‘understandable’ moderate depression. GPs identified poor access to cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as the greatest barrier to implementing guidelines. Only 41% personally used CBT. Adherence to NICE guidelines was significantly higher for GPs trained in psychiatry and in younger GPs, but was not associated with gender, practice size, possessing the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners or reading guidelines. Less than half (38%) of the GPs rated NICE as having a moderate or substantial impact upon their clinical management. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) had more influence than NICE guidelines upon detection and recording of care, especially in larger practices.

Training more cognitive behaviour therapists, making psychiatry experience mandatory for future GPs and focusing QOF incentives upon treatment outcomes as well as screening may improve adherence to NICE depression guidelines.

The aims of this study were to improve responses to students in distress and who are feeling suicidal, to help practitioners to increase their responsiveness to those at high risk of suicide and to develop effective responses to those affected by their deaths. The study sought to build a detailed picture of students’ patterns of service use.

National suicide prevention strategies emphasise that suicide prevention requires the collaboration of a wide range of organisations. Among these, primary care services play a key role in relation to suicide prevention for young people in crisis.

This study, undertaken between 2004 and 2007, focused on 20 case studies of student suicide that took place in the United Kingdom between May 2000 and June 2005. It adopted a psychological autopsy approach to learn from a wide range of informants, including parents, friends, university staff and the records of coroners or procurator fiscals. Twenty families gave permission for their son’s or daughter’s death to be included in the study and agreed to participate in the study. Informants were interviewed in person and the data were analysed thematically. Analysis of the case study data suggested that in a number of cases students had failed to engage with services sufficiently early or in sufficient depth. Primary care practitioners need to be proactive in communicating concerns about vulnerable students to student support services. At local levels, collaboration between student support and National Health Service practitioners varied considerably and channels of communication need to be developed.

We describe here an innovative scheme in general practice that provides a work-base environment for student counsellors with funding for counselling supervision and co-ordination.

The reported mental health prevalence rate in the UK among the general population is 23%. Only 76% of the above population visit a general practitioner, and of these only 44% will be diagnosed. Patients that present depressive symptoms, for example, are not always identified, and yet there is an increased recognition of the need for early diagnosis. There is little or no National Health Service (NHS) funding for counselling services in many areas of England. The training received by general practice registrars, to appropriately assess mental health problems within a typical consultation, has been the focus of a long-standing debate.

This study outlines the proposed counselling model and presents some preliminary feedback on the patient outcomes achieved.

The provision of a training environment for counsellor students is an option for increasing access of patients to counselling under the NHS.

To describe the service use and clinical outcomes associated with the implementation of a complex intervention designed to improve care for people with depression in a primary care setting.

Health systems have limited capacity to provide appropriate psychological and pharmacological treatments for people with depression. Guidance on the treatment of depression in primary care in the United Kingdom was clarified by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2004. However, there is little evidence so far of substantial changes in practice: antidepressant prescriptions continue to rise, there is limited access to psychological therapies and uncertainty persists about who should be treated for what and how. Although the welfare of staff is critical to their therapeutic engagement with patients, this is rarely an explicit focus of health systems design.

An observational study examining the implementation of a complex intervention to improve depression care called ‘Doing Well’, based in 14 general practices in a mixed urban-rural area in Scotland, United Kingdom. A small team of clinicians implemented a programme for people with low mood, depression and adjustment disorder, based on primary care. This programme incorporated a number of changes in standard mental health care, including the following: no ‘severity threshold’ for referral to secondary care; routine use of an objective measure of depression severity with continuous outcome monitoring; prompt access to guided self-help; prompt ‘step-up’ care to more formal psychological therapy or medical care, if indicated; and careful attention to staff training and satisfaction.

There was good fidelity to the model of care designed by the programme. There was a high demand for the new service (1.8% of the catchment population each year) but the programme had the capacity to manage this adequately. Clinical outcomes were satisfactory, and antidepressant use adhered to the guidelines.

This study investigated two initiatives for preventing falls in Cheshire: public events to raise population awareness about falls and ways of preventing falls, a programme of falls assessments and falls prevention classes.

The study aimed to support service development by generating local learning about: the falls risk status of older people attending the public events and their use of services for preventing falls, the efficiency and effectiveness of the falls programme.

A local adaptation of an instrument used in similar research was administered to assess the falls risk status of older people attending the public events. This instrument captures data about the age, sex, gait, sensory deficit, falls history, current medication, medical history, mobility and living situation of respondents. Attendees were also asked about their current use of falls services. To evaluate the falls programme data were collected about the characteristics and referral sources of service users and, for users of the falls prevention classes: their mobility and balance on joining and completing the classes; their fear of falling and confidence linked to falls at the start of the classes and six months later; the number of falls they experienced in the six months before starting and after completing the classes.

Of the 453 attendees screened, 64.3% were at medium risk of falling or above and 34.3% had suffered previous falls. None were accessing falls prevention services. During its first year, 324 individuals were referred to the falls programme. Overall, among those individuals who provided data for analysis, there was a statistically significant improvement in the ‘clinical’ outcomes assessed and a statistically significant reduction in the occurrence of falls. The majority of respondents indicated that they achieved an improved confidence linked to falls and a reduced fear of falling.

Studies of this type can provide a valuable contribution to local learning but the characteristics of the research collaborations developed can affect study designs and the quality of the information generated. Improved contracting arrangements between service commissioners and providers may provide an opportunity to increase the rigour of local developmental studies.

The aim of this study was to explore the awareness and views of members of the ethnic minority community towards primary health care interpreting provision in two localities in Hertfordshire.

Ethnic minority groups often have to undertake many aspects of their day-to-day lives with limited English. The provision of high quality language interpretation services is vital for enabling access to public services, including healthcare. The use of accredited or professional interpreters has been minimal within primary care and undermines the principle of equity in the National Health Service. The local Primary Care Trust and ethnic minority forums initiated this study.

The overall research design was qualitative and data collection was undertaken using focus groups. Twenty-four participants from the Pakistani (Punjabi and Urdu speakers), Bangladeshi (Bengali speakers) and Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin speakers) communities took part in one of five focus groups. Ethnic minority members recruited participants, conducted the focus groups and translated the interviews after receiving in-depth training.

Participants were unaware that healthcare professionals could access interpreting provision for their primary health care consultations, which were usually managed with the assistance of family members (including children) and friends. Both the appropriateness of using children and the potential compromising of confidentiality and privacy when using friends to interpret were concerns. Women discussed inventing illnesses rather than talking openly about embarrassing health issues in front of their children or husbands, which they suggested, may lead to depression or other mental health problems. Trust, accuracy, independence and confidentiality were important attributes participants expected in a professional interpreter whom they would prefer was from their own gender and culture.

In many countries there is a gap between the clinical evidence for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention and implementation in clinical practice. Inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors and underutilization of aspirin, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers are well-established examples. The optimal approach to implementation of CVD prevention in clinical practice is still under debate. The screening and monitoring (SaM) approach is based on cyclic monitoring and individual treatment of patients with cardiovascular risk factors in the primary care setting. After achieving improvements in risk factor levels and in the use of preventive medications in a pilot study, it was decided to test the efficacy of this approach in a larger population at risk.

Five primary care clinics adopted the SaM approach. A total of 1622 patients with established CVD, diabetes mellitus or hypertension were assessed by their family physicians for cardiovascular risk factors and use of medications for cardiovascular risk reduction. Interventions were made according to accepted clinical guidelines. Cardiovascular risk factor levels and the use of medications for CVD prevention were retrospectively analyzed.

The results demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels, as well as significant increases in the use of medications for CVD prevention.

A systematic approach to CVD reduction, with an emphasis on multiple risk factor assessment and use of preventive medications in patients at cardiovascular risk, yielded significant improvements in measures of the quality of preventive care.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation phase of a multidisciplinary persistent pain service (PPS).

A multidisciplinary PPS was established in January 2008 at the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Referral is made into the service via general practitioners (GPs). Patients see an appropriate mix of clinicians; they include a pain specialist, physiotherapists, an occupational therapist, psychologists and/or health and advice worker.

Data were collected by using patient questionnaires, monthly activity reports from clinicians, service administration and patient and staff interviews.

Service activity steadily increased to full capacity after nine months. Eighty-two percent (31/38) of Tower Hamlets GP clinics referred patients to the service; the referrals were appropriate. The discharge rate at nine months was 5% while 9% failed to attend or declined to attend. Patients saw on average two clinical specialities, post multidisciplinary team discussion and had four appointments. The majority of patients were female (89/144, 62%); between 41 and 60 years old (55%), unemployed (79%), received disability or incapacity allowances (28%), had pain for more than 10 years (27%) and were not fluent in English (37%). The patient and practitioner interviews highlighted: difficulties keeping track of patients as they progressed through the service, inconsistent administration that affected patient satisfaction, lack of understanding of treatment process and plans and cross discipline learning benefit for staff.

Implementing a multidisciplinary service requires forethought, and regular monitoring to ensure efficiency. For multidisciplinary services we recommend: GP education, clear delineation of responsibilities between staff, efficient systems for tracking patient progress, regular staff meetings and jointly negotiated treatment plans that patients can keep.

Studies have established that many depressed adolescent patients do not receive optimal mental health care. Specifically, depression in primary-care settings is underrecognized, undertreated, and stigmatized. Although the seriousness and prevalence of adolescent depression is well known to primary-care physicians, its assessment, diagnosis, and treatment remains a significant problem in general and in rural communities in particular.

In this article, the author accomplishes three aims: (1) summarizes the most current evidence-based guidelines for depression care for adolescents in primary-care settings, (2) reviews the empirical literature on how key patient demographic variables (race, gender, and age) may be correlated with and predictive of variations in evidence-based depression care (assessment, diagnosis, and treatment) for adolescent patients, particularly in rural areas, and (3) provides implications for translating empirical research findings to evidence-based depression care in rural primary-care settings.