Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Perspectives on Politics
  4. Volume 13
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 13 - December 2015

Contents

Page 3 of 21

Critical Dialogue

Review Essays

Reflections Symposium

  • Reconsidering the Middle: A Reply to Martin Gilens

  • Peter K. Enns
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    15 December 2015, pp. 1072-1074
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Review Essays

Reflections Symposium

Critical Dialogue

Review Essays

  • Police Work: The Centrality of Labor Repression in American Political History

  • Alex Gourevitch
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    07 September 2015, pp. 762-773
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Reflections Symposium Response

Critical Dialogue

Review Essays

  • Policing Democracy: Race, Riots and Protest

  • William Smith
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    07 September 2015, pp. 774-777
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Reflections Symposium

  • Pluralism and the Fate of Perestroika: A Historical Reflection

  • John Gunnell
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    18 June 2015, pp. 408-415

  • Although a great deal has been written about the perestroika movement in turn-of-the century political science its actual place in the history of the discipline has been poorly understood by its founders, defenders, and critics. Perestroika can be best understood as a manifestation of the persistent crises of identity that have characterized the discipline of political science, and it cannot be explained apart from the manner in which it was reflection of issues that attended both the origins of the field and periods such as the 1920s and aftermath of the behavioral era. What has been particularly important in each case has been the impact on both American politics and political science of the ethic of pluralism, which has created significant difficulties for both the practical and epistemic relationship between the discipline and its subject matter. — John Gunnell.

    This essay is followed by responses from James Farr, Robert O. Keohane, David D. Laitin, Kristen Renwick Monroe, Anne Norton, and Sanford F. Schram. John Gunnell then offers a response to commentators.

Critical Dialogue

Reflections Symposium

Review Essays

  • The Militarization of Policing and the Future of U.S. Politics

  • Christopher J. Coyne
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    07 September 2015, pp. 778-781
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 21