Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:58:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transport properties of thin metallic films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

M. J. Baines
M. J. Baines
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsUniversity College of Ghana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In using the Boltzmann equation to calculate the transport properties of thin metallic films, it is usually assumed that a time of relaxation exists for the scattering in the film which is the same as for the bulk metal, although this is only strictly justified in the ideal case of isotropic scattering. The correct Boltzmann equation in the case of elastic scattering, when the cross-section depends on the angle of scatter, is set up and possible methods of solution are discussed.

The equation is solved for a simple anisotropic scattering law and the electrical resistivity and thermo-electric power are found to depend upon two parameters which are measures respectively of the thickness of the film and the anisotropy of the scattering mechanism. The numerical results for the electrical resistivity, however, differ only slightly from those given by the one-parameter formula obtained when a time of relaxation is assumed to exist.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , July 1961 , pp. 606 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Andrew, E. R.Proc. Phys. Soc. A, 62 (1949), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Busbridge, I. W.Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 115 (1955), 521; see also Ibid. 117 (1957), 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Chambers, R. G.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 202 (1950), 378.Google Scholar
(4)Chandrasekhar, S.radiative transfer (Oxford, 1950).Google Scholar
(5)Chandrasekhar, S. and Breen, F. H.Astrophys. J. 108 (1948), 92.Google Scholar
(6)Davison, B. and Sykes, J. B.Neutron transport theory (Oxford, 1957).Google Scholar
(7)Dingle, R. B.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 201 (1950), 545.Google Scholar
(8)Fuchs, K.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 34 (1938), 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Moliner, F. Garcia and Simons, S.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 53 (1957), 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Hammad, A.Phil. Mag. (7), 38 (1947), 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Justi, E., Kohler, M. and Lautz, G. Z.Naturforsch. 6 a (1951), 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Kohn, W. and Luttinger, J. M.Phys. Rev. 108 (1957), 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Lovell, A. C. B.Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 157 (1936), 311.Google Scholar
(14)Nordheim, L.Ann. Phys., Lpz., (5), 9 (1931), 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Placzek, G.The functions En(x) (National Research Council of Canada, Division of Atomic Energy, NRC. no. 1547, 1947).Google Scholar
(16)Sondheimer, E. H.Advances in physics, 1 (1952), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Thomson, J. J.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 11 (1901), 120.Google Scholar
(18)Wilson, A. H.The theory of metals (Cambridge, 1953).Google Scholar