In the normal procedure for establishing linearized stability criteria a mean steady state which we denote by U is perturbed by a small additional disturbance u in the Eulerian sense. In the linearization it is usual to regard the disturbance as resolved into Fourier components which are additive so far as the first order goes. The linearized problem will then determine a time amplification factor eiσr so that the linearized disturbance is of the form uexp{i(αx + σt)} and the whole motion U + uexp{i(αx + σt)}. As usual it is implied that the real part of complex functions such as uexp{i(αx + σt)} be taken. In cases of instability (imaginary part of σ negative), where the magnitude of the disturbance increases with the time, we are prompted to ask how energy is supplied to the disturbance. This question is especially relevant to many of the classical problems of fluid motion instability in which the systems are self-contained in the sense that energy is neither supplied nor withdrawn by an outside agency. If such a system is non-dissipative we expect that the total energy of the organized motion and the electromagnetic field, if present, shall be conserved, whilst such energy in a dissipative system will be gradually reduced by heat losses. In either case energy which is taken into a growing disturbance must be provided from the mean energy stored in the system in its initial state. One of the simplest cases of instability to examine from this point of view is the Helmholtz instability of a plane in viscid vortex sheet. This system is self-contained and conservative in the energy of the organized motion, and moreover the only form of energy with which we have to deal is kinetic energy. In the first part of this note we examine how disturbance kinetic energy is provided in this case by the break up of the organized motion of the mean stream. In the second part we consider what happens to the energy balance of a current-vortex sheet in the non-dissipative case. There are here two forms of energy, kinetic and magnetic, and it is shown that when the interface is unstable the overall magnetic energy increases at the expense of the kinetic energy.