Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:07:41.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

James P. Lantolf
James P. Lantolf*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This presentation is situated within the general framework of Vygotsky's educational theory, which argues that development in formal educational activity is a fundamentally different process from development that occurs in the everyday world. A cornerstone of Vygotsky's theory is that to be successful education must be sensitive to learners' zone of proximal development. This requires the dialectical integration of instruction and assessment into a seamless and dynamic activity. The presentation includes a discussion of how the integration is systematically achieved in the process known as dynamic assessment and illustrates through analysis of data from advanced learners of French how this functions in second language education.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 355 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S. & Miller, S. M. (eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davydov, V. V. (2004). Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study (translated by Moxhay, Peter). Moscow: Akademiya Press.Google Scholar
DiCamilla, F. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). The linguistic analysis of private writing. Language Sciences 16, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2007). The associative–cognitive CREED. In VanPatten, & Williams, J. (eds.), 77–98.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. & Lantolf, J. P. (2008). A concept-based approach to teaching writing through genre analysis. In Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox, 285–320.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y. & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Fogel, A. (1991). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gal'perin, P. Ya. (1967). On the notion of internalization. Soviet Psychology 5.3, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal'perin, P. Ya. (1979). The role of orientation in thought. Soviet Psychology 18.2, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In VanPatten & Williams (eds.), 175–200.Google Scholar
Guthke, J., Heinrich, A. & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of ‘syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition’: A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning. In Klix, F. & Hagendorf, H. (eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 127–152.Google Scholar
Haywood, H. C. & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations in thinking (revised edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karpov, Y. B. & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation: Implications for instruction. American Psychologist 53, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KinardJ. T., Sr. J. T., Sr. & Kozulin, A. (2008). Rigorous mathematical thinking: Conceptual formation in the mathematics classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1995). The learning process: Vygotsky's theory in the mirror of its interpretations. School Psychology International 16, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. A (ed.) (2007). Second language acquisition reconceptualized? The impact of Firth and Wagner (1997). Focus issue of The Modern Language Journal 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Conceptual knowledge and instructed second language learning: A sociocultural perspective. In. Fotos, S. & Nassaji, H. (eds.), Form focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–54.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. forthcoming a. Minding your hands: The function of gesture in L2 learning. In Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive approaches to SLA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. forthcoming b. Praxis and classroom L2 development. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2007). Dynamic assessment: A teacher's guide. University Park, PA: CALPER Publications.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment. In Shohamy, E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of language and education (vol. 7): Language testing and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 273–285.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. H. (1991). Introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychological and the language learning process. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. (1991). Practioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1998). SLA: Breaking the siege. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 17, 79–129.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior 31, 1–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Marx, K. (1844/1972). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. In Tucker, (ed.), 221–293.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1845/1972). Theses on Feuerbach. In Tucker, (ed.), 143–145.Google Scholar
McCafferty, S. G. (1998). Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics 19, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In Lidz, C. (ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactive approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: The Guilford Press, 116–140.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching–learning of second languages : Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal 91, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E. forthcoming. Dynamic assessment as a dialectical framework for validity in the L2 classroom.Google Scholar
Poehner, M. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 9, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi-Landi, F. (1983). Language as work & trade: A semiotic homology for linguistics & economics. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Adams.Google Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talyzina, N. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress Press.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research –1997–2007. The Modern Language Journal 91, 837–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, R. C (ed.) (1972). The Marx–Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.) (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ed. by Cole, M., John–Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 1): Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and speech (ed. by Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 4): The history of the development of higher mental functions (ed. by Rieber, R. W.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 5): Child psychology (ed. by Rieber, R. W.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In Rieber, R. W. & Robinson, D. K.. (eds.), The essential Vygotsky. New York: Kluwer/Plenum, 227–344.Google Scholar
Yáñez Prieto, C. M. (2008). On literature and the secret art of invisible words: Teaching literature through language. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar