Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:35:37.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An axiomatics for nonstandard set theory, based on von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

P. V. Andreev  and
E. I. Gordon
P. V. Andreev
Affiliation:
Xanadu Studio LLC, 4 Zubovski Blvd. Moscow, 119021, Russia, Phone: 7(095) 201-8972, E-mail: [email protected]
E. I. Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, 1409 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA, Phone: 1(217) 333-9661, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present an axiomatic framework for nonstandard analysis—the Nonstandard Class Theory (NCT) which extends von Neumann–Gödel–Bernays Set Theory (NBG) by adding a unary predicate symbol St to the language of NBG (St(X) means that the class X is standard) and axioms—related to it—analogs of Nelson's idealization, standardization and transfer principles. Those principles are formulated as axioms, rather than axiom schemes, so that NCT is finitely axiomatizable. NCT can be considered as a theory of definable classes of Bounded Set Theory by V. Kanovei and M. Reeken. In many aspects NCT resembles the Alternative Set Theory by P. Vopenka. For example there exist semisets (proper subclasses of sets) in NCT and it can be proved that a set has a standard finite cardinality iff it does not contain any proper subsemiset. Semisets can be considered as external classes in NCT. Thus the saturation principle can be formalized in NCT.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 1321 - 1341
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[And]Andreev, P. V., On standardization principle in bounded set theory, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya 1, Matematika, Mekhanika, (1997), no. 1, pp. 68–70 (Russian).Google Scholar
[BHr]Ballard, D. and Hrbáˇcek, K., Standard foundations for nonstandard analysis, this Journal, vol. 57 (1992), pp. 471–478.Google Scholar
[Dav]Davis, M., Applied nonstandard analysis, John Wiley Interscience Publication, New York—London—Sydney—Toronto, 1977.Google Scholar
[DN]Di Nasso, M., An axiomatic presentation of the nonstandard methods in mathematics, to appear in this Journal.Google Scholar
[Gor]Gordon, E. I., Relatively standard elements in the E. Nelson's internal set theory, Siberian Mathematical Journal, (1989), no. 1, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
[Gor1]Gordon, E. I., Nonstandard methods in commutative harmonic analysis, AMS, Providence, RI, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[GoRe]Gordon, E. I. and Rezvova, O. A., On Hyperfinite Approximations of the field R, submitted to the Proceedings of the Conference “Reuniting of the Antipodes”.Google Scholar
[Hr1]Hrbáček, K., Axiomatic foundations for nonstandard analysis, this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), p. 285, abstract.Google Scholar
[Hr2]Hrbáček, K., Axiomatic foundations for nonstandard analysis, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 98 (1978), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Hr3]Hrbáček, K., Nonstandard set theory, The American Mathetical Monthly, vol. 86 (1979), pp. 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[KRe]Kanovei, V. and Reeken, M., Internal approach to external sets and universes, Stadia Logica, (1995), part I: vol. 55, (1995), pp. 227–235; part II: vol. 55, (1995), pp. 347–376; part III: vol. 56, (1996), pp. 293–322.Google Scholar
[Kaw]Kawai, T., Axiom system of nonstandard set theory, Logic symposia, Hakone, 1979, 1980 (Berlin), Springer, 1981, pp. 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Knu]Knuth, D., Art of computer programming, vol. II, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1998.Google Scholar
[Nel]Nelson, E., Internal set theory, a new approach to nonstandard analysis, American Mathematical Society Bulletin, vol. 83 (1977), pp. 1165–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Nel1]Nelson, E., Radically elementary probability theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SBR]Stroyan, K. D., Benninghofen, B., and Richter, M., Superinfinitesimals in topology and functional analysis, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 59 (1989), no. 3, pp. 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Vop]Vopenka, P., Mathematics in the alternative set theory, Teubner, Leipzig, 1979.Google Scholar