Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:24:49.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Almost strongly minimal theories. I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

John T. Baldwin*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823

Extract

In [1] the notions of strongly minimal formula and algebraic closure were applied to the study of ℵ1-categorical theories. In this paper we study a particularly simple class of ℵ1-categorical theories. We characterize this class in terms of the analysis of the Stone space of models of T given by Morley [3].

We assume familiarity with [1] and [3], but for convenience we list the principal results and definitions from those papers which are used here. Our notation is the same as in [1] with the following exceptions.

We deal with a countable first order language L. We may extend the language L in several ways. If is an L-structure, there is a natural extension of L obtained by adjoining to L a constant a for each (the universe of ). For each sentence A(a1, …, an) ∈ L(A) we say satisfies A(a1, …, an) and write if in Shoenfield's notation If is an L-structure and X is a subset of , then L(X) is the language obtained by adjoining to L a name x for each is the natural expansion of to an L(X)-structure. A structure is an inessential expansion [4, p. 141] of an L-structure if for some .

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1]Baldwin, J. T. and Lachlan, A. H., On strongly minimal sets, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 7996.Google Scholar
[2]Marsh, W. E., On ℵ1-categorical but not ℵ0-categorical theories, Doctoral Dissertation, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1966.Google Scholar
[3]Morley, M., Categoricity in power, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 114 (1965), pp. 514538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Shoenheld, J. R., Mathematical logic, Addison-Wesley, 1967.Google Scholar