OBJECTIVES/GOALS: 1. Describe the importance of community engaged research. 2. Explore the impact of participating in Community Engagement Studios from the perspective of the community expert. 3. Explain how Community Engagement Studios can positively impact clinical and translational sciences. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Stakeholders who participate in CE Studios are defined as community experts (CEs); care-givers, patients, researchers, etc. They are not classified as research participants, but rather consultants, who are designated with the task of providing input on the specified research study. CEs were recruited in a variety of formats such as clinics, social media, and other community-based settings. To be eligible for the study, CEs had to participate in at least one CE Studio prior to data collection. Data was collected from an online survey from April to September of 2019. One hundred and fifteen CEs participated in the study. We conducted thematic analysis on a total of 233 participant responses to three open-ended questions assessing attitudes towards research, desire to engage in research, and understanding of research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Ten major themes emerged from the data: involvement, togetherness, trust, value, confidence, community engagement, community connectedness, encouraging others to participate, increase knowledge and awareness, and respect. A major overarching theme of inclusion was presented in the data. Findings from this study indicate that CE Studios provide a space for CEs to gain a better understanding of the multi-faceted research process, offer insight into ways to include historically excluded populations, and increase trust, confidence and respect for researchers and the research process. Moreover, community experts felt connected to their community by participating in CE Studios and expressed interest in encouraging others to participate. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: CEs are a crucial component of the research process, and their experiences should be utilized and reflected upon as we work to reduce health disparities. CE Studios serve to build trust, identify strategic areas of improvement in research, and provide a foundation to introduce community members to the multiple ways to engage in research.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To increase vaccination rates in Black and Latino communities, specifically in South LA and the Eastside of LA. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Multimedia campaign combined with vaccine navigation and assistance, led by the SC CTSI and conducted by an interdisciplinary team from 14 schools at USC and CHLA, >160 community partners. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: VaccinateLA was a highly interdisciplinary and multifaceted project that demonstrated increased vaccination rates in Black and Latino communities in South LA and Eastern part of LA. We vaccinated over 1000 people, facilitated vaccines for almost 10k people and reached 1.37M people through our digital campaign. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We have used community vaccine navigators, pop-up clinics, narrative storytelling and other unique approaches to encourage vaccine uptake in communities of color. We plan to expand activities to parents and children in these communities, encourage booster uptake, and evaluate and disseminate the program widely.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This proposed qualitative study aims to explore the perspectives about PrEP among heterosexual, cisgender Black women currently enrolled at an HBCU. Specifically, this study will elucidate this populations knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs surrounding PrEP uptake and marketing. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Health Belief Model adapted from Chandler, Hull et al. (2020) will be utilized as the conceptual framework to guide this study. Multiple virtual semi structured focus groups will be conducted with individuals at two HBCUs. Study participants (n=20-25) will meet the following inclusion criteria: (a) self-identifies as Black/African American, (b) was assigned female at birth, (c) is enrolled at Morgan State University or Spelman College, (d) is 18 years or older, (e) is sexually active (anal, oral, vaginal, or experimental), (f) is HIV negative, (g) has multiple sexual partners and/or has inconsistent condom usage. A qualitative data analysis will be conducted utilizing MAXQDA software to perform a thematic analysis by creating a codebook and identifying prominent themes related to perceptions and use of PrEP. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The research is on-going pending IRB approval. Data collection will include questions focused on topics surrounding PrEP, barriers/facilitators to participation in a proposed PrEP campaign, and sexual/reproductive health. These findings will characterize the awareness of PrEP among Black HBCU women, identify factors that may facilitate or cause barriers to Black HBCU womens knowledge and uptake of PrEP, and identify best practices for successful marketing strategies for PrEP campaigns targeting uptake among HBCU women DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Findings from this study can help the public health community tailor PrEP campaigns designed for college-age Black women thereby curtailing HIV transmission among this at-risk group.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Fertility preservation (FP) allows transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients undergoing gender-affirming therapy to pursue genetic parenthood. Barriers to care exist leading to its underutilization; while these barriers to care have been investigated, the true utilization rates of FP services by TGD patients are unknown. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This study includes a retrospective chart review of adult and pediatric patients from Mayo Clinics Transgender and Intersex Specialty Care Clinic who have provided research authorization. We will assess if FP was discussed and review if the patients proceeded to make appointments with either the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility or the Department of Urology. FP terms include semen cryopreservation, sperm extraction, sperm aspiration, testicular tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, embryo cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Patient demographic data will be collected to determine associations between utilization rate and age, sex recorded at birth, gender identity, race, ethnicity, and variables related to socioeconomic determinants of health. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that the rate of FP utilization will be higher for patients who begin to affirm their gender at the age of 25 or older, and for those seeking feminization treatment in comparison to pre-pubescent adolescents, young adults, and transgender men. Of FP options, semen cryopreservation will be most utilized, followed by oocyte cryopreservation; both will be more utilized than embryo cryopreservation, sperm extraction, sperm aspiration, testicular tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Employment, and insurance status and coverage, will play a role in FP service utilization after initial consult. This study was approved by Mayo Clinics Institutional Review Board. Data on N=611 patients is expected to be abstracted and analyzed prior to Translation 2022. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This study will be one of the first to examine the rate of FP utilization by TGD patients with respect to the age and timing of gender-affirming therapy initiation. Understanding the rate of utilization of FP services will allow for the creation of age-appropriate education materials for TGD patients pursuing gender affirmation and FP at Mayo Clinic.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: This study examines the impact of COVID restrictions on the process of engagement in the Ohio-HCS site. The goals are to: examine the impact of COVID restrictions on the process of engagement; 2) determine differences in process measures by geographic region (rural, urban). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Engagement activities collected as part of the Ohio HCS include an engagement log, coalition meeting type and attendance, tracker of implementation strategies. Study period: January 2020 to October 31, 2021. Measures are defined below. Meeting occurrence, type by month: Data report on whether a meeting occurred, was scheduled and cancelled, or a scheduled off-month. The meeting platform was also recorded (in-person, hybrid, virtual). Coalition meeting attendance by month: Number of community members in attendance. Engagement communications by type, by month: Counts and percent (types: email, calls, zoom, or in person). Evidence-Based Practices(EBP) delivery option: in person, virtual, or hybrid. Counties: 9 Ohio counties, 5 rural, 4 urban. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Coalition meetings were cancelled in 40% of rural counties; none in the urban counties. Two rural counties switched back to in person or hybrid meetings by late 2020; urban counties remain 100% virtual. Rural counties had a drop-off in attendance in June 2021 with no decrease seen in urban counties. During first two months of 2020 engagement in rural and urban communities occurred in person; by March that shifted to 80% by email, which continued within rural counties. In urban counties that dropped to 50% by August of 2020, with zoom calls accounting for 30%. In-person strategies for naloxone distribution remained high in both county types (90%); urban counties use of in-person only strategies for medication for OUD (rural: 83%, urban 52%) and safer prescribing (rural:74%, urban:10%) were much lower than rural counties. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Results show that rural counties continue to rely on in person engagement strategies, making COVID restrictions more disruptive for rural counties. These results suggest that new supports and strategies may be needed to assure that rural regions are equally equipped to engage in research in a virtual environment.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Stigma may be a barrier to care for Latinx children with autism, given lasting effects on individuals and families in other disorders. No study has explored autism stigma and its effect in this group. We explore the Latinx community’s beliefs and stigmatizing attitudes towards and the effect of stigma on Latinx individuals with autism and their family. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Approximately 30 Latinx parents of typically-developing children recruited from Portland, Oregon and Birmingham, Alabama will complete a 60-90 minute interview and demographics questionnaire in Spanish. Participants will receive $50 for completion of the study. Using a phenomenological approach, a coding framework will be developed for the qualitative interview data. Structural coding will establish a set of predetermined codes that characterize the data generally. An emergent coding approach will be used to create new codes exploring each predetermined global characterization more precisely. Interviews and coding will cease when thematic saturation is achieved. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Research exploring perspectives of parents of children with autism has suggested that autism stigma is high in the Latinx population and results in social isolation. However, results regarding developmental disability stigma in the general Latinx population have shown low rates of reported stigma. This suggests: 1.) stigma is not as high as reported by parents of children with autism, 2.) those perpetuating stigma are not reporting it explicitly on quantitative measures, and/or 3.) those perpetuating stigma are not aware that these attitudes are stigmatizing. A qualitative approach allows for a better characterization of this understudied phenomenon and explores the disconnect between the stigmatized and the stigmatizing. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: By answering: “How do Latinx community members view autism?” and “How does stigma affect social support?” we open avenues for research, including: utilizing collectivistic culture in linguistically- and culturally-sensitive ways to spread knowledge of autism, provide social support for families, and increase inclusivity.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Translating Research into Practice (TRIP), a hybrid implementation pragmatic clinical trial and CTSA collaboration, aims to implement a standardized breast cancer patient navigation protocol across five sites in Boston, MA. The goal of this study was to assess individual and institutional barriers and facilitators to implementing this protocol. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: From November 2019 to August 2020, researchers conducted ethnographic observations of Patient Navigators (PN) at three of the five participating sites. Each PN at each site was observed for two, four-hour blocks by researchers trained in ethnographic research. Observers took notes using TRIPs 11 Step Protocol as a guide, which includes identifying patients at risk for delays in care, screening and referring patients to resources for health-related social needs, and tracking patients across the care continuum. Fieldnotes were uploaded into Dedoose and coded deductively by four researchers using a comparison and consensus approach. Researchers analyzed the data to identify barriers and facilitators to both implementing each protocol step and maximizing navigations ability to promote health equity. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Across all sites, PNs faced barriers to adhering to the TRIP Protocol due to practical workflow constraints including their level of engagement across the cancer care continuum. Although there are other staff members who engage in navigation activities, navigation is often viewed solely as the responsibility of the PN. Operationalizing navigation as a person rather than a process creates confusion around the role, and PNs are often seen as a catchall position when other staff do not know how to help a patient. The time that PNs spend on tasks unrelated to core navigation activities described in the TRIP Protocol prevents PNs from navigating patients most at risk for delays in care. A lack of continuity across the care continuum can create role confusion for the PNs. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Patient Navigation can promote health equity; however, any task that pulls PNs away from navigating patients most at risk for delays in care diminishes this potential. PNs abilities to enact the TRIP protocol, which they saw as valuable, is circumscribed by the extent to which navigation is operationalized as a process within the institution.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: University faculty partner with Community Consultants (CC) to: 1) identify health concerns of Chicagos South Side residents, 2) provide information regarding resources that address community health concerns, and 3) disseminate the model across the Institute for Translational Medicines (ITM) institutional partners. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: CCs met twice monthly with University faculty and staff to identify CGR topics, delivery format, and audience development strategies. Faculty from the University of Chicago and community experts presented on identified health topics. Traditionally held in a community setting, CGR moved to a virtual format due to the pandemic. Recent topics covered included issues around the impact of COVID-19 on African American and LatinX communities and vaccine hesitancy. Audience members were surveyed at the end of each session and provides information on the quality and impact of the content. Twice during the season, partners debriefed on the effectiveness of the partnership and program. A plan was developed to deploy CGR across the ITM partners. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Since 2010, there have been 63 CGRs, and over 5370 attendees. To date, 95% of audience members report that the content of CGR is of value and would recommend it to others. Audience members surveyed report knowledge gains about the topics presented, satisfaction with venues and speakers, and support the continuation of the series. Despite having to move to a virtual format due to the COVID-19 pandemic, audience members continue to attend CGR and rate the program as valuable and something that they would recommend to others. CCs report commitment to the partnership and CGR. CGR served as a connector for audience members to COVID-19 resources such as grief support groups and financial assistance. Loyola University, an ITM partner, implemented the CGR model, with more planning to do the same. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: CGR is effective at providing health information in a community setting. CGRs success is due to the commitment of its partners and its ability to respond to community needs. During the pandemic, attendance at each virtual CGR remained steady and audience feedback remained positive. CGR continues to serve as a connector to valuable resources.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The HIV acquisition rate is higher for cisgender black women in the United States. This population has a much lower use of FDA-approved pre-exposure prophylaxis drug (PrEP) for HIV prevention. This systematic literature review examines factors that hinder PrEP use among cisgender black women. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane were used to conduct a systematic literature search. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predetermined to narrow down the search and to identify the appropriate studies. The retrieved literature was exported to EndNote for deduplication. The literature was then uploaded into Rayyan for title and abstract screening. The two collaborators were blinded to limit bias. Literature characterized as conflict was resolved by an independent, third collaborator. Full-text screening of the selected studies was done and a PRISMA flow diagram was developed for identification, screening, eligibility, and to detail included literature. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 185 articles were obtained from the systematic literature search. 172 were excluded and 13 full-text articles were accessed for eligibility. One was removed. 12 studies involving 974 study participants met inclusion criteria for analysis. Despite the disproportionally high risk of HIV infection, black women only represented 29% of the study participants. Top three barriers to low PrEP use were stigma, socio-economic factors, and personal factors. Stigma included concerns about HIV and sexuality. Socio economic barriers were related to homelessness and low income. Personal factors included substance abuse, incarceration, and commercial sex work. The data confirms that these risk factors were not always rigid but changed based on patient characteristics and external factors. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The study outcomes confirmed a multitude of risk factors that serve as impediments in the use of PrEP among cisgender black women. When these risk factors are identified and addressed, the decision to use PrEP among cisgender black women may increase, therefore this warrants further investigation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: All IN for Health has initiated social media engagement strategies to create bi-directional communication around improved health and research literacy with the public. In addition, the All IN for Healths community-led advisory board, comprised of diverse individuals and organizations, will provide insight on research design and dissemination. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) has committed to enhancing the publics engagement efforts in the All IN for Health program. This program was established in 2017 to improve the health of Indiana residents through the promotion of health resources and opportunities to participate in research. In 2021, the Indiana CTSI decided to integrate public engagement more formally. An official collaboration with the Indiana CTSIs Community Health Partnerships program was created, a digital engagement specialist was hired, and several new community and population health advisory board members were welcomed for quarterly meetings representing the rural and urban areas of the state, faith-based communities, health departments, and underrepresented groups in research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A social media campaign, informed by the All IN for Health advisory board was launched in November 2021, and the advisory board has been meeting on a quarterly basis. All IN for Healths established priority area is currently COVID-19 vaccination uptake, and our prioritized audiences are underserved and under resourced in urban and rural communities, and minoritized populations. All IN for Health has posted approximately 20 times per month on topics including COVID-19, Alzeheimers Disease, Diabetes, fitness, mental health, and research studies with a goal to increase followers and engagements by 20%. The hope is that this engagement will also result in an increase in the monthly e-newsletter subscribers and study volunteer registry participants. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: All IN for Health has initiated new public engagement efforts to increase the value of the services offered to Indiana residents. Through consultation and co-design with members of the public and dissemination of research opportunities All IN for Health will be better suited to improve health and research literacy.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of this project was to recruit racially and ethnically diverse participants with an accelerated timeline into a COVID-19 vaccine trial. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Recruitment of diverse populations was a priority. Culturally appropriate strategies were implemented to increase enrollment of African Americans and Hispanics from the DC Metropolitan area. These strategies included the use of the Community Advisory Board for consultation, faith-based community events, town halls, radio advertisements which targeted the African American community, and the NIAID COVID-19 registry. Meaningful patient engagement by the study recruiter/coordinator throughout the study was key to recruitment and retention of participants (i.e. listening attentively, sharing personal experiences with vaccination, providing participants with enough information to make an informed decision). Education on the importance of research and vaccines was a component throughout the process. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Howard University site screened 188 participants. Of those, 150 were recruited into the vaccine trial from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (30% AA, 21% Hispanic, 5% Asian, 1% mixed race), a total of 57% over seven weeks. Of the 150 participants 64% were male and 36% females. The study involved a 2:1 randomization with vaccine vs. placebo. All of the 150participants received the first and second COVID-19 vaccine/placebo doses administered 21 days apart. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Culturally-relevant recruitment strategies allowed for meaningful community and patient interactions and were important determinants for effectively recruiting a racially and ethnically diverse group of participants within a short amount of time. Strategies employed could be applied effectively in other trials.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test the effects of a community health worker supported model to deliver home-based COVID-19 testing in the Yakima Valley (Washington) and Flathead Reservation (Montana) METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of a community health worker supported model to deliver home-based COVID-19 testing in the Yakima Valley (Washington) and Flathead Reservation (Montana) vs. a modified direct-to-consumer. 400 participants will be enrolled, 200 from each community. Outcomes include comparing the number of completed testing kits as well as the number of testing kits with successful (detected vs not-detected) results. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The poster presents preliminary results from 191 participants, blinded to study assignment. To date, 53% of enrolled participants returned a sample for testing and 39% received a usable (detected or not-detected) result. Our populations experienced a high-rate (16%) of sample errors, required 28 replacement kits and had 20 participants randomized to the control arm receive the intervention to ensure participants received testing during the pandemic. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Home-based testing models are build for those who are proficient in verbal and written English, have high tech. literacy and continuous access to internet. For home-based testing to have similar success rates as white Americans, cultural and demographic differences and disparities will need to be accounted for in development and implementation.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Through the Community Mini-Grant program, the University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science Community Engagement and Research Core (CERC) provides a unique funding mechanism designed to empower community response by supporting local solutions to complex health issues facing central Appalachian Kentucky communities. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Four $2500 grants are awarded annually to Appalachian organizations to implement evidence-based programs responsive to community-identified priority health needs. The CERC also supports program implementation and evaluation by facilitating collaborations between the organizations, community practitioners, and academic researchers. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Since inception, grants have been awarded to 20 community organizations in 14 Appalachian counties. Health issues addressed have ranged from Alzheimers disease, cancer treatment and prevention, obesity, healthy lifestyle, and chronic disease management and prevention. Evidence-based programs have focused on improving health outcomes among older adults, caregivers, youth, children, women and infants, and families. Program outcomes have included immediate health benefits and long-term benefits resulting from community adoption of and ongoing financial support for programs. As example, results of an evidence-based educational program to improve diabetic foot assessment among clinicians in a large Appalachian healthcare network resulted in establishment of a traveling podiatrist program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Community mini-grant recipients have successfully implemented projects that address the most significant health disparities in the region. Also of benefit are expanded partnerships that are foundational to the creation of new academic-community collaborations to address the challenging health issues of Appalachian populations in Kentucky.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To describe a study to develop, test, and collect implementation data on a youth-led hypertension (HTN) education digital intervention that acts as an electronic tool to guide youth through learning and then teaching adults on how to achieve better HTN control. Adults with uncontrolled HTN are recruited from a New Jersey emergency department (ED). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Adults with HTN and youth (15-18 years) participate in a remote user-centered design session focus group to provide input in the development of the youth-led HTN education digital intervention. 100 adult ED patients with uncontrolled HTN (blood pressure (BP) ≥130/80 mm Hg) who live with a youth (15-18 years) and the youth themselves are recruited for a randomized control trial (RCT). The adult-youth dyad is randomized to one of two arms, each a 6-week program with youth earning a digital badge: 1) intervention- youth-led HTN education with the adult, or 2) control- youth learn life skills (such as job readiness/resume building). Implementation metrics are collected through a post-intervention survey and qualitative interviews on the digital badge intervention including acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We completed two youth focus groups (total of 8 participants) and data collection is ongoing. Youth have shown great interest in the intervention prototype and thought their peers would find it acceptable. They suggested additions to nutrition education activities, such as adding a sodium tracker and examples of high sodium foods. For the RCT, the primary study outcome is adult BP change (from baseline to 1 week and 2-months post-intervention), with secondary outcomes of HTN knowledge and youth self-efficacy. We anticipate that intervention arm adults will have a more significant decrease in BP than control arm adults. We also expect that HTN knowledge and youth self-efficacy will be higher for the intervention arm. Implementation data collected will allow for improvements to future renditions of the intervention. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Bringing health education home while simultaneously empowering youth is an innovative technology-driven model for improving BP for patients with uncontrolled HTN who may lack access to care. Outcomes of this project will result in a scalable and easily adoptable model to reach an otherwise difficult to reach adult population.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Despite a disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on minority and under-resourced communities, nearly all COVID-19 resources have only been online in English. A statewide coalition of community and academic partners used community-engaged strategies to provide tailored outreach to diverse populations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The STOP COVID-19 CA statewide team had a workgroup focused on communications. Members of this group represented different sectors, racial/ethnic groups, disciplines, and regions across the state. They had regular meetings to discuss and strategize how to overcome the impact of historic and structural racism on access to COVID-19 resources, including testing, vaccines, and protective equipment. The team also shared regular updates about changes in community concerns and needs as well as new, tailored resources. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Together, the team has been able to reach diverse populations across the state, including providing information about COVID-19 in multiple languages and formats, from radio to virtual town halls to local health fairs. The multiple sites also increased access to vaccines and testing through trusted community leaders and locations, including church-based locations to bringing vaccines and testing directly to workplaces. These community pop-up vaccination sites have helped to vaccinate large numbers of diverse populations, some of whom were initially unsure about getting the vaccine, which has helped to reduce the gaps in community vaccination rates by race/ethnicity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This network of community-engaged strategies utilized for rapid COVID-19 response could also be used to for responses to future public health emergencies, addressing chronic diseases (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), or even other complex issues that affect society and health (e.g., climate change).

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Children with medical complexity (CMC) experience frequent transitions of care (e.g., hospital to home) and are at increased risk for medication-related harm. This study aimed to identify transition-related medication safety barriers experienced by family caregivers, as they shoulder most of the caregiving responsibility following discharge. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We conducted semi-structured qualitative research interviews of 6 family caregivers and 10 healthcare professionals with roles assisting families during hospital discharge. Interviews focused on identifying key stages of the hospital-to-home transition period as well as medication-related tasks, decisions, and contexts. Transcribed audio interviews and research meeting notes were content analyzed to develop journey maps visually depicting key phases of the families experiences managing medication at home and their decision points and unmet needs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Journey mapping identified key decision points, medication management needs, and way points navigated by family caregivers during the hospital-to-home transition. Findings were salient for each phase of the family journey: 1) initial admission/intra-unit transfer; 2) in-patient care; 3) peri-discharge planning; 4) discharge; 5) immediate post discharge period (we termed post-discharge configuration); and 6) period of ongoing tasks and needs. Illustrative examples will be presented and discussed. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Family caregivers of CMC have needs that evolve throughout the medication use journey, suggesting a need for interventions that account for the time variant nature of this work. Findings lay a foundation for the next step of our study which aims to develop a prototype medication safety intervention that will be evaluated with family caregivers.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project is to understand vaccine hesitancy and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among underserved communities in South Florida, to promote vaccine awareness, and to tailor education and communication based on the findings, in partnership with local community-based organizations. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: By partnering with local community organizations, leaders, faith groups, and other trusted sources, the FL-CEAL teams will conduct a nationally developed CEAL survey in minority communities in South Florida to understand vaccine hesitancy and barriers, conduct outreach activities such as webinars and virtual townhalls to address hesitancy and promote vaccine uptake, and develop and disseminate educational materials and social media communications based on findings. The communities in South Florida include the Latinx farm working community, Latinx sexual/gender minorities, and Haitian and Black populations in South Florida. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Early findings have indicated that hesitancy drivers vary among specific communities, while lack of trust is an overall barrier. Over 100 outreach activities have been conducted, including events with subject matter experts and community partners addressing vaccines. A credit-earning Community Health Worker (CHW) curriculum on COVID vaccine hesitancy was created in partnership with the Miami CTSI and the Florida CHW Coalition and has been delivered to over 200 Florida CHWs. The training focuses on evidence-informed best practices for CHWs to increase vaccine acceptance. At least 350 surveys will be conducted to understand beliefs and concerns around COVID-19 vaccines, and tailor education materials and communication strategies. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The FL-CEAL Alliance has successfully leveraged their ongoing state-wide effort at addressing COVID-19 disparities to focus on COVID vaccine hesitancy in minority communities and leveraged data and findings to inform community-specific approaches in addressing some of those barriers.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Colorado Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (CO-CEAL) Team has worked with 5 racial/ethnic communities in Colorado to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and develop messages, materials and dissemination strategies to impact vaccine hesitancy. Relationships have been key facilitators of this work. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: CO-CEAL was funded for one year as a part of the national CEAL Teams effort. CO-CEAL engaged urban Hispanic/LatinX, rural Hispanic/LatinX, urban African/American, rural African Immigrant and urban American Indian/Alaska Native communities through Community Connectors in each community. Our Community Connectors led recruitment of community members for our community survey data collection (goal of 200 surveys from each community) and participation in our 5 Community (Boot Camp) Translations. Where possible we worked with Community Connectors and leveraged community relationships with whom we had worked over multiple years and projects. In two communities we worked to quickly build and establish new relationships with Community Connectors and their communities. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The rapid nature of the CO-CEAL project, its timeline and the unusual nature of the funding mechanism required adaptations to usual ways of working on both the academic and community side.In our CO-CEAL partner communities where there was a history of working together, concerns, possible barriers and other issues tended to be rapidly addressed. The prior existing, long-standing relationships fostered trust that enabled open airing of concerns and an ability to address issues as they arose. In CO-CEAL partner communities where new relationships were being forged, trust needed to be build from the ground up. This made adaptations more challenging and the ability to address concerns and issues as they arose more problematic. Although the work has moved forward in all communities, extra care has been required in some. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: When crises necessitate rapid action in communities, the depth of prior investments in building and maintaining relationships makes a difference in how rapidly and successfully partners can work together to address a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. Funders and Academic researchers should invest broadly in communities to enable rapid responses.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: At least 15 stroke thrombectomies per proceduralist per year are required for Thrombectomy-Capable and Comprehensive Stroke Centers. We sought to estimate the potential impact of these minimum volume thresholds on geographic access to stroke thrombectomy (ST). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the Florida State Inpatient Database, we will identify patients discharged with acute ischemic stroke from 2015-2019 and all non-federal facilities that performed ≥1 ST procedure per year. We will then calculate the proportion of stroke patients who live within 20, 65, 115, 165 and 200 miles (correlating with estimated ground transport times of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 hours, respectively) of centers that perform ST using ArcGIS software and evaluate the impact of varying the threshold ST volume required by each facility on this proportion. We will then perform multiple two proportion z-tests to compare proportions of patients within driving distance over time. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that over time, and particularly after the pivotal trials of ST were published in 2015, that the number of facilities that perform ST have increased over time, which would increase the geographic access to ST. We also hypothesize that since the Joint Commission set the minimum procedural volume for proceduralists at Thrombectomy-Capable and Comprehensive Stroke Center to 15 per year, this would work to increase regionalization and could work to decrease geographic access to ST. However, we hope to elucidate the net impact of the interplay between these two opposing factors on regionalization of care over time which is currently unclear. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Current ST volume thresholds have focused on technical proficiency but may impact regionalization of care and geographic access to ST. Since access to ST is time-sensitive, a data-driven approach and better coordination on a regional level may be necessary to ensure timely access to ST.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Caregivers of patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD) are invaluable contributors to patient health, but they may experience psychological symptoms or worsening quality of life related to caregiving. We aimed to explore VAD caregiving burden and resilience comparing high and low burden patient-caregiver dyads. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using a convergent mixed-methods design, we conducted semi-structured interviews and collected self-reported surveys from patient-caregiver dyads. Patients (n=10, mean age 55.8 years) were mostly white males implanted as destination therapy. Caregivers (n=10, mean age 52.6) were mostly white females. Most dyads were spousal (n=6). Caregiver burden was measured with the Zarit Burden Interview Scale, using the median score to categorize lower and higher burden dyads (median = 12, IQR = 8). Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding for thematic analysis. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Lower and higher burden dyads described the shared burden experience of 1) hyper-vigilance and uncertainty immediately post-implant and 2) changing relationship roles. Lower burden dyads were more likely to able to take on responsibilities outside of caregiving. Contextual differences among higher burden dyads included higher financial strain, less social support, worse quality of life (both patients and caregivers) and worse heart failure severity compared to lower burden dyads. All dyads were resilient, using coping strategies like cognitive reframing, positivity, and adaptation to new roles. Higher burden dyads were more vulnerable to coping fatigue and were more likely to express that the VAD had irreversibly changed their life. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: VAD caregiver-patient dyads differ in their levels of caregiver burden. Burden experiences and resilience mechanisms may inform future interventions to reduce caregiver burden in diverse VAD dyads. Knowledge of the caregiver experience and factors contributing to burden can inform the healthcare team in providing essential caregiver support.