Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:24:11.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PROMOZIONE E PROTEZIONE DELLA DEMOCRAZIA. IL CONCETTO, LE RICERCHE, LA VALUTAZIONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Philippe C. Schmitter  and
Imco Brouwer

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

La promozione della liberalizzazione politica, della democratizzazione e del consolidamento delle democrazie di recente istituzione da parte delle democrazie già affermate – in breve, le iniziative di promozione e protezione della democrazia (Democracy Promotion & Protection: Dpp) – è uno scopo perseguito da tempo. Soltanto di recente, tuttavia, esso si è trasformato in una vera e propria politica pubblica.

Summary

Summary

This essay deals with democracy promotion and protection by established democracies. It first describes how the dynamics and understanding of regime transitions changed from the first to the present fourth wave of democratisation. Subsequently, it defines democracy promotion and protection and describes the different components of it. Finally, it discusses the issue of the strategies of the democracy promoters and protectors and takes a critical look at the issue of evaluating their activities.

This essay claims, among other things, that: (1) in general, the goals of the democracy promoters and protectors are focused on outcomes and less on democracy as an open ended process or procedure of government; (2) there is no apolitical way to democratize and, therefore, there is no apolitical strategy to promote and protect democracy; (3) democracy promotion differs significantly from democracy protection, but donors are rarely aware of it; (4) for impact evaluation of democracy promotion and protection to make sense, three different levels of impact should be distinguished: the micro, the meso and the macro.

Type
Saggi
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , August 2000 , pp. 187 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Ahmadi, S. (1996), Document de base. Problèmes clés concernant les pratiques des donateurs: droits de l'homme et aide au développement, Centre de Documentation de l'Ocde/Agence Canadienne de Développement International.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.F. (1989), LÉtat en Afrique. La politique du ventre, Paris, Fayard.Google Scholar
Brouwer, I. (2000), Civil Society Assistance to the Arab World. The Cases of Egypt and Palestine, in Carothers, T. e Ottaway, M. (a cura di), Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion, Washington D.C., Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Carothers, Th. (1997), Democracy Assistance: the Question of Strategy, in «Democratization», n. 3, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Cida (1996), Government of Canada Policy for Cida. Democratization and Good Governance, dicembre.Google Scholar
Collier, R.B. e Collier, D. (1991), Shaping the Political Arena. Critical junctures: The Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Golub, S. (1993), Assessing and Enhancing the Impact of Democratic Development Projects: A Practitioner's Perspective, in «Studies in Comparative International Development», n. 1, pp. 54–70.Google Scholar
Hibou, B. (1998), Banque mondiale: le méfaits du catéchisme économique, in «Esprit», agosto-settembre, pp. 98–140.Google Scholar
Hulme, D. e Edwards, M. (a cura di) (1997), NGOs, State and Donors: Too Close for Comfort?, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Isa Consult, European Institute (Sussex University), Giw Europe (1997), Evaluation of the Phare and Tacis Democracy Program 1992–1997, draft del Rapporto finale, settembre.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. (1998), Democracy Promotion as an Objective of Foreign Policy, relazione al Convegno su «International Relations and Democracy», Varsavia, 26–28 giugno.Google Scholar
Karl, T.K. e Schmitter, Ph.C. (1991), What Democracy Is … and Is Not, in «Journal of Democracy», 2, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Pridham, G. (a cura di) (1991), Encouraging Democracy: The International Context of regime Transition in Southern Europe, Leicester, Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (1996), Strengthening Civil Society through Foreign Political Aid, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, Escor, Research Report R6234, settembre.Google Scholar
Russet, B. (1993), Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World, Princeton, Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Ph.C. (1995), The Consolidation of Political Democracies: Processes, Rhythms, Sequences and Types, ora in G. Pridham (a cura di), Transition to Democracy: Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and Eastern Europe , Dartmouth, The International Library of Politics and Comparative Government, pp. 535–569.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Ph.C. (1996), The Influence of the International Context upon the Choice of National Institutions and Policies in Neo-Democracies, in Whitehead (a cura di), pp. 26–54.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Ph.C. e Guilhot, N. (di prossima pubblicazione), De la transition à la consolidation. Une lecture retrospective des ‘democratization studies’, in «Revue française de science politique».Google Scholar
Schmitter, Ph.C. e Karl, T. (1991), Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe, in «International Social Science Journal», n. 128, pp. 269–284.Google Scholar
Whitehead, L. (a cura di) (1996), The International Dimension of Democratization: Europe and Americas, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar