No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 June 2016
La nozione di struttura sociale sembra essere centrale nelle scienze sociali. Queste, infatti, hanno le interazioni umane come principale punto focale; e tutte ricercano, in tali interazioni, dei modelli di riferimento. Così, non è sorprendente trovare riferimenti costanti alla «struttura sociale» nella letteratura delle varie discipline sociali. Ciononostante, la capacità di compiere analisi strutturali nelle scienze sociali, in relazione ad altre capacità analitiche, è poco sviluppata e, al tempo stesso, poco utilizzata. Ritengo che tale deficienza costituisca un ostacolo basilare al progresso teorico.
1 Cfr. Bottomore, T.B., Structure and History , in Blau, P.M., (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, New York, The Free Press, 1975, pp. 165, 169.Google Scholar
2 Cfr. Homans, G.C., What Do We Mean by Social ‘Structure’? , in Blau, (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, cit., p. 57.Google Scholar
3 Ibidem, p. 53.Google Scholar
4 Cfr. Blau, , Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, cit., pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
5 Cfr. Chomsky, N., Syntactic Structures, The Hague, Mouton, 1975.Google Scholar
6 Cfr. Levi-Strauss, C., The Elementary Forms of Kinship, Boston, Beacon Press, 1949; e Levi-Strauss, C., The Structural Study of Myth, in Levi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, New York, Basic Books, 1963, pp. 206–231.Google Scholar
7 Blau, , Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, cit., p. 14.Google Scholar
8 Radcliffe-Brown, A.R., Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Glencoe, Free Press, 1952, p. 190.Google Scholar
9 Si vedano, a titolo esemplificato, i lavori citati in Evan, W. M., Organization Theory and Organizational Effectiveness: An Exploratory Analysis , in «Organization and Administrative Sciences», VII (1976), pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
10 Bronowski, J., The Discovery of Form , in Kepes, G., (ed.), Structure in Art and Science, New York, George Braziller, 1965, p. 59.Google Scholar
11 Cfr. Taylor, M., Influence Structures , in «Sociometry», XXXII (1969), pp. 500–501.Google Scholar
12 Si vedano Noble, M., Social Network: Its Use as a Conceptual Framework in Family Analysis , in Boissevain, J. e Mitchell, J.C., (eds.), Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction, The Hague; Mouton, 1973, p. 4; e Mitchell, J.C. (ed.), Social Network in Urban Situations, Manchester, Manchester U.P., 1969, p. 15.Google Scholar
13 Kaplan, A., Consequences and Prospects , in Kahn, R.L. e Boulding, E., (eds.), Power and Conflict in Organizations, New York, Basic Books, 1964, p. 69.Google Scholar
14 Kornhauser, W., ‘Power Elite’ or ‘Veto Groups’? , in Domhoff, G.W. e Ballard, H.B., (eds.), C. Wright Mills and The Power Elite, Boston, Beacon Press, 1968, p. 51.Google Scholar
15 Cfr. Easton, D., A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1965, pp. 30 ss.Google Scholar
16 Cfr. White, H.C., A Calculus of Social Networks, Dipartimento di Sociologia, Università di Harvard, 1971, mimeo, p. 7.Google Scholar
17 Si veda Bales, R.F., Interaction Process Analysis, Cambridge, Addison-Wesley, 1950.Google Scholar
18 Rinvio a Leary, T., Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality, New York, Ronald Press, 1957.Google Scholar
19 Cfr. Carter, L.F., Evaluating the Performance of Individuals in Small Groups , in «Personnel Psychology», VII (1954), pp. 477–484.Google Scholar
20 Cfr. Longabaugh, R., The Structure of Interpersonal Behavior , in «Sociometry», XXIX (1966), pp. 441–460.Google Scholar
21 Si veda, per esempio, Fesler, J.W., Approaches to the Understanding of Decentralization , in «Journal of Politics», XXVII (1965), p. 537.Google Scholar
22 Cfr. Brams, S.J., Measuring the Concentration of Power in Political Systems , in «American Political Science Review», LXII (1968), pp. 461–475.Google Scholar
23 Russett, B.M., Probabilism and the Number of Units Affected: Measuring Influence Concentration , in «American Political Science Review», LXII (1968), pp. 476–480.Google Scholar
24 Taylor, , Influence Structures, cit., pp. 490–502.Google Scholar
25 Sul punto si veda Baldwin, D.A., Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies , in «World Politics», XXXI (1979), pp. 161–194.Google Scholar
26 Si veda, per esempio, Ray, J.L. e Singer, J.D., Measuring the Concentration of Power in the International System , in «Sociological Methods and Research», I (1973), p. 422.Google Scholar
27 Cfr. Taylor, , Influence Structures, cit., pp. 490–502.Google Scholar
28 Rinvio ancora a Taylor, , Influence Structures, cit., p. 499.Google Scholar
29 Blau, , Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, cit., p. 235.Google Scholar
30 Si vedano, ad esempio, Bott, E., Family and Social Networks, Londra, Tavistock Publications, 1957; Mitchell, , Social Networks in Urban Situations, cit.; Boissevain, e Mitchell, , Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction, cit.Google Scholar
31 Cfr. Bott, , family and Social Networks, cit.Google Scholar
32 Cfr. Frey, F.W., Political Development, Power, and Communications in Turkey , in Pye, L.W., (ed.), Communications and Political Development, Princeton, Princeton U.P., 1963, p. 303.Google Scholar
33 Cfr. Bueno de Mesquita, B., Systemic Polarization and the Occurrence and Duration of War , in «Journal of Conflict Resolution», XXII (1978), pp. 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Si veda Niemeijer, R., Some Applications of the Notion of Density to Network Analysis , in Boissevain, e Mitchell, , Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction, cit., pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
35 Cfr. Harary, F. e Norman, R.Z., Graph Theory as a Mathematical Model in Social Science, Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research (Università del Michigan), 1953.Google Scholar
36 French, J.R.P. Jr., A Formal Theory of Social Power , in «Psychological Review», LXIII (1956), pp. 181–194.Google Scholar
37 Ibidem, p. 189.Google Scholar
38 Si veda Holland, P.W. e Leinhardt, S., Local Structure in Social Networks , in Heise, D.R., (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1976, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976; Holland, P.W., A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometrie Data , in Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm, New York, Academic Press, 1977, pp. 411–432; Holland, P.W., Transitivity in Structural Models of Small Groups, in Leinhardt, , Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm, cit., pp. 49–66; Holland, P.W., An Omnibus Test of Social Structure Using Triads, in «Sociological Methods and Research», 1978, pp. 227–256.Google Scholar
39 Cfr. Banfield, E.C., Political Influence, New York, Free Press of Glencoe, 1961.Google Scholar
40 Cfr. Burt, R.S., Positions in Networks , in «Social Forces», LV (1976), pp. 93–122. Ma vedi anche più avanti.Google Scholar
41 Si veda Dahl, R.A., Who Governs?, New Haven, Yale U.P., 1961.Google Scholar
42 Coleman, J.S., Introduction to Mathematical Sociology, New York, Free Press of Glencoe, 1964, p. 444 ma si veda tutto il cap. 14, Measures of Structural Characteristics .Google Scholar
43 Levine, J.H. e Mullins, N.C., Structuralist Analysis of Data in Sociology , in «Connections», I (1978), p. 18.Google Scholar
44 Lankford, P.M., Comparative Analysis of Clique Identification Methods , in «Sociometry», XXXVII (1974), pp. 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 Barnes, J.A., Networks and Political Process , in Mitchell, , Social Networks in Urban Situations, cit., p. 64.Google Scholar
46 Niemeijer, R., Some Applications of the Notion of Density to Network Analysis, cit., p. 55.Google Scholar
47 Si vedano White, H.C., Boorman, S.A. e Breiger, R.L., Social Structure from Multiple Networks: I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , in «American Journal of Sociology», LXXXI (1976), pp. 730–780; Boorman, S.A. e White, H.C., Social Structure from Multiple Networks: II. Role Structures, in «American Journal of Sociology», LXXXI (1976), pp. 1384–1446; Arabie, P., Boorman, S.A. e Levitt, P.R., Constructing Blockmodels: How and Why, in «Journal of Mathematical Psychology», XVII (1978), pp. 21–63.Google Scholar
48 Rinvio, a Burt, , Positions in Networks, cit.; Burt, R.S., Positions in Multiple Network Systems (Part I e II), in «Social Forces», LVI (1977), pp. 106–131 e 551–575.Google Scholar
49 Burt, , Positions in Networks, cit. Oltre alla trattazione qui fatta, si veda anche il prossimo paragrafo.Google Scholar
50 Cfr. Freeman, L.C., A Set of Measures of Centrality based on Betweenness , in «Sociometry», XL (1977), pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
51 Rinvio a Bavelas, A., A Mathematical Model for Group Structure , in «Applied Anthropology», VII (1948), pp. 16–30; e Bavelas, A., Communication Patterns in Task Oriented Groups, in «Journal of the Acoustical Society of America», LVII (1950), pp. 271–282.Google Scholar
52 Freeman, , A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness, cit., p. 36.Google Scholar
53 Burt, , Positions in Networks, cit.Google Scholar
54 Cfr. ibidem, pp. 94–95.Google Scholar
55 Cfr. Truman, D., The Governmental Process, New York, Knopf, 1951.Google Scholar