This journal uses a double-anonymous model of peer review.

New submissions received through the online submission system are first assessed by the Executive Editor to determine if they fit the scope and focus of the journal. When in doubt whether a submission should be taken into further consideration, the Executive Editor consults one or more members of the EC.

After a positive assessment, the Executive Editor will invite two or more relevant expert reviewers via the online peer review system to give their critical assessment of the quality of the submission. Expert reviewers receive an anonymized version of the article and a standardized peer review form.