Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. European Journal of Risk Regulation
  4. Volume 5
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 5 - March 2014

Contents

Page 5 of 5

Other

Case Notes

  • The Conferral of Power to the Commission Put to the Test

  • Camilla Buchanan
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. 267-272

  • Case C-427/12 Commission v European Parliament and Council (not yet reported)

    - Article 290 TFEU

    - Article 291(2) TFEU

    - Article 80(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, OJ 2012 L 167/1

    1. 1. The EU legislature has discretion when it decides to confer a delegated power on the Commission pursuant to Article 290(1) TFEU or an implementing power pursuant to Article 291(2) TFEU. Consequently, judicial reviewis limited tomanifest errors of assessment (official headnote)

    2. 2. The Commission appears to have more liberty under Article 290 TFEU than Article 291(2) TFEU, however this may be misleading. The difference between adding “further details” (implementing act) and supplementing or amending non-essential elements to a basic act (delegated act) is difficult to gauge. Furthermore, the control foreseen to be exercised by the Member States and the Parliament and Councilmay not function as planned (author's headnote).

Book Reviews

Back matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Front matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. f1-f4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Case Notes

  • Stem Cell Lines and Destruction of Human Embryos: the EPO Shares the Perspective of the Court of Justice

  • Stefano Barazza
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. 273-277

  • The Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office, in case T 2221/10, held that Article 53(a) and Rule 28(c) of the European Patent Convention do not merely exclude the patentability of biotechnological inventions that make use of human embryonic stem cells obtained by de novo destruction of human embryos, but also apply to inventions which employ publicly available cell lines which were initially derived by a process resulting in the destruction of human embryos. The decision relies on the judgment of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in theWARF case, falling in line with the perspective endorsed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace.

Back matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Other

Book Reviews

Other

Front matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. f1-f4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. f1-f7
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • ERR volume 5 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 January 2017, pp. b1-b4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 5 of 5