Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:06:03.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Local Campaign Intensity: The Canadian General Election of 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2011

William Cross  and
Lisa Young
William Cross*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Lisa Young*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
William Cross, Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, [email protected]
Lisa Young, Department of Political Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. There is considerable evidence that local campaign activity is positively related both to a party's constituency level vote share and to voter participation rates. In this article we consider the degree of variance of local campaign intensity at the constituency level in the Liberal and New Democratic parties in the 2008 Canadian federal election and consider the variables that may explain this variance. Utilizing data collected through a post-election mail-back survey of candidates, we find significant variance in local campaign activity and identify six factors that influence it. These are an objective measure of the local candidate's chance for victory in the constituency, the candidate's subjective view of their chances, whether the candidate was challenged for the local nomination, how involved the candidate is in his/her local community, whether the candidate contested the prior election and whether party notables from outside the constituency campaigned in the riding.

Résumé. Les preuves sont considérables au fait que l'activité dans les campagnes locales correspond à la part des votes dans la circonscription électorale ainsi qu'à la participation électorale. Dans cet article nous considérons le degré de variance de l'intensité des campagnes locales des partis Libéral et Nouveau Démocratique durant l'élection fédérale Canadienne 2008 et examinons les données qui expliquent la variation. En utilisant les données recueillies par des questionnaires postélectoraux des candidats retournés par la poste, nous trouvons une variance significative dans l'activité des campagnes locales et nous identifions six facteurs qui l'influencent. Ils sont: une mesure objective des chances de victoire du candidat, l'impression subjective du candidat de ses chances de gagner, si le candidat était mis au défi dans la nomination locale, la participation du candidat dans sa communauté locale, si le candidat avait contesté l'élection précédente, et si les notables du parti en dehors de la circonscription faisaient campagne pour le candidat dans sa circonscription.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 553 - 571
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, David and Bolan, Catherine. 1991. “The Mass Media and Federal Election Campaigning at the Local Level: A Case Study of Two Ontario Constituencies.” In Canadian Political Parties: Leaders, Candidates and Organization, ed. Bakvis, Herman. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth and Marsh, Michael. 2003. “For a Few Euros More: Campaign Spending Effects in the Irish Local Elections of 1999.” Party Politics 9: 561–82.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Kavanagh, Dennis. 1988. The British General Election of 1987. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 1991. Canadian Political Parties in the Constituencies. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth, Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2000. Rebuilding Canadian Party Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William. 2006. “Candidate Nomination in Canada's Political Parties.” In The Canadian General Election of 2006, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2004. “The Contours of Political Party Membership in Canada.” Party Politics 10: 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denver, David. 2009. “Is There a Way Forward for the Study of Constituency Campaigning in Britain?” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties specialist group, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Denver, David, Fisher, Justin and MacAllister, Iain. 2003. “Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2001: Centralization and Modernization.” Party Politics 9: 541–59.Google Scholar
Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. 1997. “Challengers, Incumbents and the Impact of Constituency Campaigning in Britain.” Electoral Studies 16: 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. 1998. “Constituency Campaigning in the 1997 General Election: Party Effort and Electoral Effect.” In Why Labour Won the General Election of 1997, ed. Crewe, Ivor, Gresschalk, Brian and Bartle, John. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Denver, David and Hands, Gordon. 2004. “Labour's Targeted Constituency Campaigning: Nationally Directed or Locally Produced?” Electoral Studies 23: 709–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elections Canada. 2008. Final Candidates' Election Expenses Limit (October 14).Google Scholar
Erickson, Lynda and Laycock, David. 2008. “Modernization, Incremental Progress, and the Challenge of Relevance: the NDP's 2008 Campaign.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2008, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Tom and Jansen, Harold. 2008. “Election Campaigns under Canada's Party Finance Laws.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2008, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Funke, Alice and Stanbury, W.T.. 2009. “Money, Money: Candidates' Spending and Federal Election Expenses,” Hill Times, May 4.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron and Pattie, Charles. 1995. “The Impact of Party Spending on Party Constituency Campaigns at Recent British General Elections.” Party Politics 1: 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon. 2006. “Voter Turnout in 2006: More than just the weather.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2006, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Loewen, Peter and Blais, André. 2006. “Did Bill C-24 Affect Voter Turnout? Evidence from the 2000 and 2004 Elections.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 935–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, David, Friedrichs, Ryan and King, David. 2006. “Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (1): 85–97.Google Scholar
Pammett, Jon and LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters. Ottawa: Elections Canada.Google Scholar
Sayers, Anthony. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul. 2002. New Labour's Grass Roots. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitehorn, Alan. 2000. “The 2000 NDP Campaign: Social Democracy at the Crossroads.” In The Canadian Federal Election of 2000, ed. Pammett, Jon and Dornan, Christopher. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul and Seyd, Patrick. 2003. “Party Election Campaigning in Britain.” Party Politics 9: 637–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa and Cross, William. 2002. “Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (3): 547–69.Google Scholar