Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:35:45.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What draws the line between perception and cognition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Martin Rolfs  and
Michael Dambacher
Martin Rolfs
Affiliation:
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience & Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany. [email protected]://www.rolfslab.de/
Michael Dambacher
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. [email protected]://scikon.uni-konstanz.de/personen/michael.dambacher/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The investigation of top-down effects on perception requires a rigorous definition of what qualifies as perceptual to begin with. Whereas Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) phenomenological demarcation of perception from cognition appeals to intuition, we argue that the dividing line is best attained at the functional level. We exemplify how this approach facilitates scrutinizing putative interactions between judging and perceiving.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boutonnet, B. & Lupyan, G. (2015) Words jump-start vision: A label advantage in object recognition. Journal of Neuroscience 32(25):9329–35. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5111-14.2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R. & Jacobs, A. M. (2009) Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE 4(3):e5047. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, C. D. & Li, W. (2013) Top-down influences on visual processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14(5):350–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, A. & Lai, V. (2012) Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(5):1104–12. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabovsky, M., Sommer, W. & Abdel Rahman, R. (2011) Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(4):990–1005. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00117.Google Scholar
Rolfs, M., Dambacher, M. & Cavanagh, P. (2013) Visual adaptation of the perception of causality. Current Biology 23(3):250–54. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.017.Google Scholar