Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:16:54.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The duality of art: Body and soul

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

George E. Newman
George E. Newman*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8200. [email protected]/newman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bullot & Reber (B&R) make a strong case for the role of causal reasoning in the appreciation of artwork. Although I agree that an artistic design stance is important for art appreciation, I suggest that it is a subset of a more general framework for evaluating artworks as the causal extensions of individuals, which includes inferences about the creator's mind, as well as more physical notions of essence.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W. & Morales, A. C. (2008) Positive consumer contagion: Responses to attractive others in retail contexts. Journal of Consumer Research 45:690–701.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2004) Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. & Markson, L. (1998) Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science 9:200–204.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2003) Authenticity in art. In: The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, ed. Levinson, J., pp. 258–74. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009) The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure & human evolution. Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1890/1959) The new golden bough: A study in magic and religion. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1902/1972) A general theory of magic, trans. Norton, R. Brain..Google Scholar
Nemeroff, C. J. & Rozin, P. (1994) The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 22:158–86.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E. & Bloom, P. (2012) Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(3):558–69. DOI: 10.1037/a0026035.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., Diesendruck, G. & Bloom, P. (2011) Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research 38:215–28.Google Scholar
Olson, K. R. & Shaw, A. (2011) “No fair, Copycat!”: What children's response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science 14:431–39.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. & Nemeroff, C. (2002) Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics.” In: Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D., pp. 201–16. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar