Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:58:28.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abstracting abstraction in development and cognitive ability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Andreas Demetriou Open the ORCID record for Andreas Demetriou [Opens in a new window]
Andreas Demetriou*
Affiliation:
Cyprus Academy of Sciences, Letters, and Arts, University of Nicosia, Cyprus, 1700Nicosia, Cyprus. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We focus on the theory of abstraction proposed by the target article. We suggest that abstraction varies at different levels of learning, cognitive development, or cognitive ability. We argue that this theory does not specify how abstraction is done at each of these levels. Because of these weaknesses, the theory cannot explicate how individuals differ in mental time travel at different phases of life or different levels of cognitive ability.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e127
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, A. (2014) Aristotle's theory of abstraction. Springer.Google Scholar
Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D. & Markman, A. B. (2013) There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8:501–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzsaki, G. (2010) Neural syntax: Cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R. B. & Horn, J. L. (1978) A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest designs. Journal of Educational Measurement 15:139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Makris, N., Kazi, S., Spanoudis, G. & Shayer, M. (2018a) The developmental trinity of mind: Cognizance, executive control, and reasoning. WIREs Cognitive Science 2018:e1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A., Makris, N., Kazi, S., Spanoudis, G., Shayer, M. & Kazali, E. (2018b) Mapping the dimensions of general intelligence: An integrated differential-developmental theory. Human Development 61:4–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159#2F000484450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetriou, A. & Spanoudis, G. (2018) Growing minds: A general theory of intelligence and learning. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jee, B. D. & Anggoro, F. K. (2019) Relational scaffolding enhances children's understanding of scientific models. Psychological Science 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619864601.Google ScholarPubMed
Jensen, A. R. (1998) The g factor: The science of mental ability. Praeger.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, E., Christou, C., Spanoudis, G. & Demetriou, A. (2016) Augmenting intelligence: Developmental limits to learning-based cognitive change. Intelligence 56:16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (2001) Studies in reflecting abstraction. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Raju, P. C. (in preparation) Levels of kernel abstraction: A proposed framework for the neurobiological basis of cognition. Computational Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Reed, S. K. (2016) A taxonomic analysis of abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11:817–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saitta, L. & Zucker, J.-D. (2013) Abstraction in artificial intelligence and complex systems. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L. & Goodman, N. D. (2011) How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331(6022):1279–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1192788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904) “General intelligence,” Objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology 15:201–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar